A methodology for evaluating robustness of face recognition algorithms with respect to variations in pose angle and illumination angle

In this paper, we present a methodology for precisely comparing the robustness of face recognition algorithms with respect to changes in pose angle and illumination angle. For this study, we have chosen four widely-used algorithms: two subspace analysis methods (principle component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA)) and two probabilistic learning methods (hidden Markov models (HMM) and Bayesian intra-personal classifier (BIC)). We compare the recognition robustness of these algorithms using a novel database (FacePix) that captures face images with a wide range of pose angles and illumination angles. We propose a method for deriving a robustness measure for each of these algorithms, with respect to pose and illumination angle changes. The results of this comparison indicate that the subspace methods perform more robustly than the probabilistic learning methods in the presence of pose and illumination angle changes.

[1]  Robert M. Haralick Performance Characterization in Computer Vision , 1992, BMVC.

[2]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  Comparison of projection-based face recognition algorithms , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation.

[3]  Shaohua Kevin Zhou,et al.  A comparison of subspace analysis for face recognition , 2003, 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME '03. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8698).

[4]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Discriminant Analysis for Recognition of Human Face Images (Invited Paper) , 1997, AVBPA.

[5]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Probabilistic Visual Learning for Object Representation , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  A nonparametric statistical comparison of principal component and linear discriminant subspaces for face recognition , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[7]  Monson H. Hayes,et al.  Face detection and recognition using hidden Markov models , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[8]  Sethuraman Panchanathan,et al.  Framework for performance evaluation of face recognition algorithms , 2002, SPIE ITCom.

[9]  Terrance E. Boult,et al.  Efficient evaluation of classification and recognition systems , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[10]  Hong Yan,et al.  Comparison of face verification results on the XM2VTFS database , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[11]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Face recognition using eigenfaces , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Face recognition: A literature survey , 2003, CSUR.

[13]  Kevin W. Bowyer,et al.  Empirical evaluation techniques in computer vision , 1998 .