Organisational learning and self-adaptation in dynamic disaster environments.

This paper examines the problems associated with inter-organisational learning and adaptation in the dynamic environments that characterise disasters. The research uses both qualitative and quantitative methods to investigate whether organisational learning took place during and in the time in between five disaster response operations in Turkey. The availability of information and its exchange and distribution within and among organisational actors determine whether self-adaptation happens in the course of a disaster response operation. Organisational flexibility supported by an appropriate information infrastructure creates conditions conducive to essential interaction and permits the flow of information. The study found that no significant organisational learning occurred within Turkish disaster management following the earthquakes in Erzincan (1992), Dinar (1995) and Ceyhan (1998). By contrast, the 'symmetry-breaking' Marmara earthquake of 1999 initiated a 'double loop' learning process that led to change in the organisational, technical and cultural aspects of Turkish disaster management, as revealed by the Duzce earthquake response operations.

[1]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  Complexity and Management , 2000 .

[2]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Man-Made Disasters, Second Edition , 1997 .

[3]  M. O'hare,et al.  Searching for Safety , 1990 .

[4]  Daniel H. Kim.  The Link between individual and organizational learning , 1997 .

[5]  Louise K. Comfort,et al.  Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: The World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001 , 2006 .

[6]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[7]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[8]  J. Bardet,et al.  Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999 reconnaissance report , 2000 .

[9]  James L. Garnett.  Communicating for Results in Government: A Strategic Approach for Public Managers , 1994 .

[10]  R. Turner,et al.  Organized Behavior in Disaster. , 1972 .

[11]  Louise K. Comfort,et al.  Integrating Information Technology into International Crisis Management and Policy , 1993 .

[12]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[13]  C. Argyris.  On organizational learning , 1993 .

[14]  David Arellano Gault,et al.  L. Douglas Kiel,managing chaos and complexity in government .A new paradigm for managing change, innovation and organizational renewal , San Francisco, Jossey -Bass,1994 , 1995 .

[15]  Mahadev Satyanarayanan,et al.  Coping with uncertainty , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[16]  Louise K. Comfort,et al.  Self-Organization in Complex Systems , 1994 .

[17]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  Approaches to social research , 1993 .

[18]  L. Comfort.  Shared Risk: Complex Systems in Seismic Response , 1999 .

[19]  Anne Sigismund Huff,et al.  Review: Handbook for Organization Studies, editedby Stewart R. Clegg, Cynthia Hardy, and Walter R. Nord.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996 , 1998 .

[20]  Murat Balamir.  Painful Steps of Progress from Crisis Planning to Contingency Planning: Changes for Disaster Preparedness in Turkey , 2002 .