Long Term Evolution Downlink Packet Scheduling Using a Novel Proportional-Fair-Energy Policy

Inter-cell interference (ICI) is a key limiting factor to the general performance of a multi-cell multi-user radio access network. The channel quality of cell edge users is greatly impaired by ICI owing to the fact that cell edge users are furthest away from the their serving base station and closest to the interfering base stations. As a result the Quality of Service (QoS) and energy efficiency of the E-UTRAN is primarily dependant on the cell edge users. Firstly, we propose a new Time Domain Packet Scheduling criterion that endeavours to reduce the variation in the energy performance, of the users, in a temporal sense. The proposed criteria aims to strike a balance between two user prioritisation criteria that result in energy performance at the two extremes of the energy consumption range. The paper shows that this improves the mean energy efficiency of the E-UTRAN. Secondly, we introduce an energy optimisation algorithm to complement the Time Domain Packet Scheduler. The new energy aware packet scheduling criteria is compared against the established throughput based proportional fair scheduler with uniform power allocation and is shown to produce 20% Energy Reduction Gains (ERG) without compromising the spectral efficiency and QoS performance.

[1]  Angela Doufexi,et al.  Power Efficient Dynamic Resource Scheduling Algorithms for LTE , 2010, 2010 IEEE 72nd Vehicular Technology Conference - Fall.

[2]  Preben E. Mogensen,et al.  Performance of Downlink Frequency Domain Packet Scheduling for the UTRAN Long Term Evolution , 2006, 2006 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[3]  Tapani Ristaniemi,et al.  Dynamic packet scheduling performance in UTRA Long Term Evolution downlink , 2008, 2008 3rd International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing.

[4]  Hu Jinling TD-SCDMA/TD-LTE evolution — Go Green , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems.

[5]  Lassi Hentila,et al.  WINNER II Channel Models , 2009 .

[6]  Changchuan Yin,et al.  Delay-Bounded Power-Efficient Packet Scheduling for Uplink Systems of LTE , 2009, 2009 5th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[7]  Marco Caretti,et al.  Energy Efficiency Evaluation of State of the Art Packet Scheduling algorithms for LTE , 2011, EW.

[8]  Piet Demeester,et al.  Comparison of power consumption of mobile WiMAX, HSPA and LTE access networks , 2010, 2010 9th Conference of Telecommunication, Media and Internet.

[9]  Stefan Videv,et al.  Energy-Efficient Scheduling and Bandwidth-Energy Efficiency Trade-Off with Low Load , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[10]  A. Jalali,et al.  Data throughput of CDMA-HDR a high efficiency-high data rate personal communication wireless system , 2000, VTC2000-Spring. 2000 IEEE 51st Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37026).

[11]  Jianhua He,et al.  SFBC MIMO Energy Efficiency Improvements of Common Packet Schedulers for the Long Term Evolution Downlink , 2011, 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).