PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE FROM RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE CLEAVAGE SITE MAPS WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE EVOLUTION OF HUMANS AND THE APES

Recombinant DNA technology provides evolutionary biologists with another tool for making phylogenetic inference through contrasts of restriction endounuclease cleavage site maps or DNA sequences between homologous DNA segments found in different groups. This paper is limited to the problem of making phylogenetic inference from restriction site maps. Several methods for making such inference have already been used or proposed (Avise et al., 1979a, 1979b;NeiandLi, 1979; Ferris et al., 1981), but all these methods depend upon the assumption that shared restriction sites reflect common evolutionary origins and are not the result of convergent evolution. Unfortunately, convergent evolution occurs with high probability for this type of data (Templeton, 1983). In addition, data from several different restriction enzymes are generally pooled in these analyses. Recently, Adams and Rothman (1982) have examined the distributions of cleavage sites and related sequences for 54 restriction endonucleases. They concluded 1) that cleavage sites and related sequences are distributed non-randomly in most DNA sequences, 2) that there is considerable heterogeneity between different restriction enzymes (even those with recognition sequences of the same length) with respect to the number and distribution of their respective cleavage sites and related sequences, and 3) that inference of phylogenetic relationship based on distances will be biased. In addition, Brown et al. (1982) sequenced 896 base pairs of the mitochondrial DNA from humans and apes and concluded that about 90% of the substitutions were transitions. The predominance of transitions over transversions increases the probability of convergence over that expected when all base substitutions are assumed to be equally likely (Templeton, 1983). Therefore, a need exists for an algorithm of phylogenetic inference that deals more directly with the problem of convergent evolution and statistical inhomogeneity between different restriction enzymes. In this paper, I propose such an algorithm. After discussing the problem of estimation of a phylogenetic tree, the task of statistical testing is then addressed. First, I present a non-parametric statistical framework for testing the fit of one hypothesized phylogeny versus an alternative phylogeny. Second, non-parametric statistical procedures are presented for testing hypotheses about relative rates of evolution among the various lineages.

[1]  C. Benham The Origin of Man , 1911, Nature.

[2]  J. WISHART,et al.  Statistical Tables , 2021, Nature.

[3]  W. J. Quesne,et al.  A Method of Selection of Characters in Numerical Taxonomy , 1969 .

[4]  L. Orgel,et al.  Biochemical Evolution , 1971, Nature.

[5]  F. McMorris,et al.  A Mathematical Foundation for the Analysis of Cladistic Character Compatibility , 1976 .

[6]  G. Todaro,et al.  Evolution of type C viral genes: evidence for an Asian origin of man , 1976, Nature.

[7]  根井 正利 Mathematical models of speciation and genetic distance , 1977 .

[8]  J. A. Cavender Taxonomy with confidence , 1978 .

[9]  W. W. Daniel Applied Nonparametric Statistics , 1979 .

[10]  J. Felsenstein Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .

[11]  F. Ayala,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MAN AND THE APES: ELECTROPHORETIC EVIDENCE , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  M. Kimura,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 1983, Scientific American.

[13]  M. Kimura Model of effectively neutral mutations in which selective constraint is incorporated. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Avise,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA clones and matriarchal phylogeny within and among geographic populations of the pocket gopher, Geomys pinetis. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  T D White,et al.  A systematic assessment of early African hominids. , 1979, Science.

[16]  W. Brown,et al.  Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Nei,et al.  Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Joseph Felsenstein,et al.  Alternative Methods of Phylogenetic Inference and their Interrelationship , 1979 .

[19]  W. Barker Ontogeny and phylogeny. , 1980, Archives of surgery.

[20]  A. Templeton,et al.  A class of models of selectively neutral alleles , 1980 .

[21]  Chromosomal evolution of the great apes and man. , 1980, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[22]  F. McMorris,et al.  When is one estimate of evolutionary relationships a refinement of another? , 1980 .

[23]  L. O. Greenfield A late divergence hypothesis , 1980 .

[24]  J. E. Cronin,et al.  NON‐LINEAR MACROMOLECULAR EVOLUTION AND THE MOLECULAR CLOCK , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  D. Pilbeam,et al.  Of mice and men: Fossil-based divergence dates and molecular “clocks” , 1980 .

[26]  R. Tuttle Evolution of hominid bipedalism and prehensile capabilities , 1981 .

[27]  Joseph Felsenstein,et al.  A likelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility , 1981 .

[28]  W. Brown,et al.  Evolutionary tree for apes and humans based on cleavage maps of mitochondrial DNA. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  James A. Cavender Tests of phylogenetic hypotheses under generalized models , 1981 .

[30]  R. L. Susman,et al.  Electromyography of the gluteal muscles in Hylobates, Pongo and Pan : implications for the evolution of hominid bipedality. , 1981 .

[31]  E. Simons Man's immediate forerunners , 1981 .

[32]  Lovejoy Co The origin of man. , 1981 .

[33]  D. Penny Towards a basis for classification: the incompleteness of distance measures, incompatibility analysis and phenetic classification. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  P. Andrews Hominoid evolution , 1982, Nature.

[35]  Biomolecular evidence on human origins from the standpoint of Darwinian theory. , 1982, Human biology.

[36]  J. Adams,et al.  Estimation of phylogenetic relationships from DNA restriction patterns and selection of endonuclease cleavage sites. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  J. C. Wall,et al.  Pliocene hominid gait: new interpretations based on available footprint data from Laetoli. , 1982, American journal of physical anthropology.

[38]  W. Jungers Lucy's limbs: skeletal allometry and locomotion in Australopithecus afarensis , 1982, Nature.

[39]  J. E. Cronin,et al.  The relationships of Sivapithecus and Ramapithecus and the evolution of the orang-utan , 1982, Nature.

[40]  W. Willis,et al.  The Origin of Man : A Chromosomal Pictorial Legacy , 2014 .