IDPs in macromolecular complexes: the roles of multivalent interactions in diverse assemblies.

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) have critical roles in a diverse array of cellular functions. Of relevance here is that they are components of macromolecular complexes, where their conformational flexibility helps mediate interactions with binding partners. IDPs often interact with their binding partners through short sequence motifs, commonly repeated within the disordered regions. As such, multivalent interactions are common for IDPs and their binding partners within macromolecular complexes. Here we discuss the importance of IDP multivalency in three very different macromolecular assemblies: biomolecular condensates, the nuclear pore, and the cytoskeleton.

[1]  Ben Lehner,et al.  Intrinsic Protein Disorder and Interaction Promiscuity Are Widely Associated with Dosage Sensitivity , 2009, Cell.

[2]  Norman E. Davey,et al.  SLiMSearch: a framework for proteome-wide discovery and annotation of functional modules in intrinsically disordered regions , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  Anthony A. Hyman,et al.  Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[4]  A. Hoelz,et al.  Architecture of the symmetric core of the nuclear pore , 2016, Science.

[5]  L. Kay,et al.  Folding of an intrinsically disordered protein by phosphorylation as a regulatory switch , 2014, Nature.

[6]  Rohit V Pappu,et al.  Relating sequence encoded information to form and function of intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2015, Current opinion in structural biology.

[7]  Peer Bork,et al.  Insight into Structure and Assembly of the Nuclear Pore Complex by Utilizing the Genome of a Eukaryotic Thermophile , 2011, Cell.

[8]  Julie D Forman-Kay,et al.  Modulation of Intrinsically Disordered Protein Function by Post-translational Modifications , 2016, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  A. Hyman,et al.  Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology. , 2014, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[10]  P. Tompa,et al.  Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[11]  Clifford P. Brangwynne,et al.  Soft active aggregates: mechanics, dynamics and self-assembly of liquid-like intracellular protein bodies , 2011 .

[12]  Lauren Ann Metskas,et al.  Order-Disorder Transitions in the Cardiac Troponin Complex. , 2016, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  E. Rhoades,et al.  Heterogeneous Tau-Tubulin Complexes Accelerate Microtubule Polymerization. , 2017, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Timothy D. Craggs,et al.  Phase Transition of a Disordered Nuage Protein Generates Environmentally Responsive Membraneless Organelles , 2015, Molecular cell.

[15]  Vladimir N Uversky,et al.  Protein intrinsic disorder-based liquid-liquid phase transitions in biological systems: Complex coacervates and membrane-less organelles. , 2017, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[16]  T. Pollard,et al.  Review of the mechanism of processive actin filament elongation by formins. , 2009, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[17]  Aidan Budd,et al.  Short linear motifs: ubiquitous and functionally diverse protein interaction modules directing cell regulation. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[18]  Jimin Pei,et al.  Cell-free Formation of RNA Granules: Bound RNAs Identify Features and Components of Cellular Assemblies , 2012, Cell.

[19]  E. Hurt,et al.  Linker Nups connect the nuclear pore complex inner ring with the outer ring and transport channel , 2015, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[20]  Roderick Y. H. Lim,et al.  Structural dynamics of the nuclear pore complex. , 2017, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[21]  D. Görlich,et al.  Transport Selectivity of Nuclear Pores, Phase Separation, and Membraneless Organelles. , 2016, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[22]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Classification of Intrinsically Disordered Regions and Proteins , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[23]  R. Huber,et al.  Molecular architecture of the Spire–actin nucleus and its implication for actin filament assembly , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  K. Teilum,et al.  Behaviour of intrinsically disordered proteins in protein–protein complexes with an emphasis on fuzziness , 2017, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[25]  A. Roll-Mecak Intrinsically disordered tubulin tails: complex tuners of microtubule functions? , 2015, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[26]  A. Tripathy,et al.  Structure of a Yeast Dyn2-Nup159 Complex and Molecular Basis for Dynein Light Chain-Nuclear Pore Interaction* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  C. Hoogenraad,et al.  Microtubule plus-end-tracking proteins: mechanisms and functions. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[28]  Norman E. Davey,et al.  Attributes of short linear motifs. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.

[29]  L. Álvarez-Vallina,et al.  The coming of age of engineered multivalent antibodies. , 2015, Drug discovery today.

[30]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Molecular basis for the functional interaction of dynein light chain with the nuclear-pore complex , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[33]  Paul S. Russo,et al.  Phase Transitions in the Assembly of MultiValent Signaling Proteins , 2016 .

[34]  C. Brangwynne,et al.  The disordered P granule protein LAF-1 drives phase separation into droplets with tunable viscosity and dynamics , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Joshua L. Phillips,et al.  A Bimodal Distribution of Two Distinct Categories of Intrinsically Disordered Structures with Separate Functions in FG Nucleoporins* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[36]  T. Pollard,et al.  The Role of the FH1 Domain and Profilin in Formin-Mediated Actin-Filament Elongation and Nucleation , 2008, Current Biology.

[37]  L. Žídek,et al.  Multiple Recognition Motifs in Nucleoporin Nup159 Provide a Stable and Rigid Nup159-Dyn2 Assembly* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  Marco Y. Hein,et al.  A Liquid-to-Solid Phase Transition of the ALS Protein FUS Accelerated by Disease Mutation , 2015, Cell.

[39]  V. Uversky,et al.  Why are “natively unfolded” proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? , 2000, Proteins.

[40]  K. Teilum,et al.  Functional aspects of protein flexibility , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[41]  E. Lemke,et al.  Floppy but not sloppy: Interaction mechanism of FG-nucleoporins and nuclear transport receptors , 2017, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[42]  David R. Liu,et al.  Sequence Determinants of Intracellular Phase Separation by Complex Coacervation of a Disordered Protein. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[43]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[44]  T. Pollard,et al.  Determinants of Formin Homology 1 (FH1) Domain Function in Actin Filament Elongation by Formins* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  Yuyu Song,et al.  Post-translational modifications of tubulin: pathways to functional diversity of microtubules. , 2015, Trends in cell biology.

[46]  A. Hyman,et al.  Germline P Granules Are Liquid Droplets That Localize by Controlled Dissolution/Condensation , 2009, Science.

[47]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Tight Regulation of Unstructured Proteins: From Transcript Synthesis to Protein Degradation , 2008, Science.

[48]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[49]  J. Sacchettini,et al.  Multivalent protein-carbohydrate interactions. A new paradigm for supermolecular assembly and signal transduction. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[50]  Identification of divergent WH2 motifs by HMM-HMM alignments , 2015, BMC Research Notes.

[51]  L. Lai,et al.  Structure-based Inhibitor Design for the Intrinsically Disordered Protein c-Myc , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[52]  Roy Parker,et al.  Formation and Maturation of Phase-Separated Liquid Droplets by RNA-Binding Proteins. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[53]  S. Shammas Mechanistic roles of protein disorder within transcription. , 2017, Current opinion in structural biology.

[54]  Jocelyn T. Compton,et al.  Tau mutants bind tubulin heterodimers with enhanced affinity , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Vladimir N Uversky,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins in overcrowded milieu: Membrane-less organelles, phase separation, and intrinsic disorder. , 2017, Current opinion in structural biology.

[56]  E. Rhoades,et al.  A functional role for intrinsic disorder in the tau-tubulin complex , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Jimin Pei,et al.  Cell-free Formation of RNA Granules: Low Complexity Sequence Domains Form Dynamic Fibers within Hydrogels , 2012, Cell.

[58]  M. Rout,et al.  The nuclear pore complex and nuclear transport. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[59]  Peter Tompa,et al.  Bioinformatics Approaches for Predicting Disordered Protein Motifs. , 2015, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[60]  Peter Tompa,et al.  Intrinsic Structural Disorder in Cytoskeletal Proteins , 2013, Cytoskeleton.

[61]  Jacek Gaertig,et al.  The Tubulin Code , 2007, Cell cycle.

[62]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  An EB1-Binding Motif Acts as a Microtubule Tip Localization Signal , 2009, Cell.

[63]  R. Mullins,et al.  Drosophila Spire is an actin nucleation factor , 2005, Nature.

[64]  A. Kanagaraj,et al.  Phase Separation by Low Complexity Domains Promotes Stress Granule Assembly and Drives Pathological Fibrillization , 2015, Cell.

[65]  C. Heijenoort,et al.  Structural features and interfacial properties of WH2, β‐thymosin domains and other intrinsically disordered domains in the regulation of actin cytoskeleton dynamics , 2013, Cytoskeleton.

[66]  D. Görlich,et al.  Nup98 FG domains from diverse species spontaneously phase-separate into particles with nuclear pore-like permselectivity , 2015, eLife.

[67]  M. Beck,et al.  The nuclear pore complex: understanding its function through structural insight , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[68]  R. Dominguez The WH2 Domain and Actin Nucleation: Necessary but Insufficient. , 2016, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[69]  M. Eck,et al.  Mechanism and function of formins in the control of actin assembly. , 2007, Annual review of biochemistry.

[70]  Jörg Gsponer,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins: regulation and disease. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[71]  J. S. Sodhi,et al.  Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[72]  A. Hyman,et al.  Active liquid-like behavior of nucleoli determines their size and shape in Xenopus laevis oocytes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Biogenesis and function of nuclear bodies. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[74]  Daniel H. Miller,et al.  Targeting the disordered C-terminus of PTP1B with an allosteric inhibitor , 2014, Nature chemical biology.

[75]  Mitsuhiko Ikura,et al.  Transcriptional/epigenetic regulator CBP/p300 in tumorigenesis: structural and functional versatility in target recognition , 2013, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[76]  Sudeep Banjade,et al.  Phase transitions of multivalent proteins can promote clustering of membrane receptors , 2014, eLife.

[77]  Peter Tompa,et al.  Polymer physics of intracellular phase transitions , 2015, Nature Physics.

[78]  O. Abián,et al.  Identification of a Drug Targeting an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Involved in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[79]  A. Hyman,et al.  Beyond stereospecificity: liquids and mesoscale organization of cytoplasm. , 2011, Developmental cell.

[80]  M. Noble,et al.  The microtubule binding domain of microtubule-associated protein MAP1B contains a repeated sequence motif unrelated to that of MAP2 and tau , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[81]  E. Rhoades,et al.  Tau Binds to Multiple Tubulin Dimers with Helical Structure. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[82]  M. Rout,et al.  The nuclear pore complex core scaffold and permeability barrier: variations of a common theme. , 2017, Current opinion in cell biology.

[83]  Martin Beck,et al.  Structural basis for assembly and function of the Nup82 complex in the nuclear pore scaffold , 2015, The Journal of cell biology.

[84]  V. Uversky Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2014 .

[85]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs). , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[86]  S. Halpain,et al.  MAP2 and tau bind longitudinally along the outer ridges of microtubule protofilaments , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[87]  S. Halpain,et al.  The MAP2/Tau family of microtubule-associated proteins , 2004, Genome Biology.

[88]  Rohit V Pappu,et al.  Intrinsically disordered linkers determine the interplay between phase separation and gelation in multivalent proteins , 2017, bioRxiv.

[89]  M. Rexach,et al.  Nuclear pore complex protein sequences determine overall copolymer brush structure and function. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[90]  Sarah A. Clark,et al.  Multivalent IDP assemblies: Unique properties of LC8‐associated, IDP duplex scaffolds , 2015, FEBS letters.