Place de l’échographie pour le bilan de la réserve ovarienne dans le cadre d’une infertilité

[1]  B. Mol,et al.  The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  P. Hoyer,et al.  Involvement of the KIT/KITL Signaling Pathway in 4-Vinylcyclohexene Diepoxide-Induced Ovarian Follicle Loss in Rats1 , 2008, Biology of reproduction.

[3]  A. El-sebaey,et al.  Anti-Müllerian hormone: correlation of early follicular, ovulatory and midluteal levels with ovarian response and cycle outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[4]  B. K. Campbell,et al.  Three‐dimensional ultrasound improves the interobserver reliability of antral follicle counts and facilitates increased clinical work flow , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  B K Campbell,et al.  Does 3D ultrasound offer any advantage in the pretreatment assessment of ovarian reserve and prediction of outcome after assisted reproduction treatment? , 2007, Human reproduction.

[6]  M. Simoni,et al.  Polymorphism of the FSH receptor and ovarian response to FSH. , 2007, Annales d'endocrinologie.

[7]  B. Mol,et al.  Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients: a comparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  N. Raine-Fenning,et al.  The interobserver reliability of off‐line antral follicle counts made from stored three‐dimensional ultrasound data: a comparative study of different measurement techniques , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  J. Skull,et al.  Evaluation of the utility of multiple endocrine and ultrasound measures of ovarian reserve in the prediction of cycle cancellation in a high-risk IVF population. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[10]  B. Mol,et al.  A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. , 2006, Human reproduction update.

[11]  P. Ho,et al.  Ovarian stromal vascularity is not predictive of ovarian response and pregnancy. , 2006, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[12]  M. Eijkemans,et al.  Use of ovarian reserve tests for the prediction of ongoing pregnancy in couples with unexplained or mild male infertility. , 2006, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[13]  W. Yeung,et al.  The significance of antral follicle count in controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination , 2005, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[14]  L. Merce,et al.  Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility of Ovarian Volume, Antral Follicle Count, and Vascularity Indices Obtained With Transvaginal 3‐Dimensional Ultrasonography, Power Doppler Angiography, and the Virtual Organ Computer‐Aided Analysis Imaging Program , 2005, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[15]  R. Casamitjana,et al.  Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist--gonadotropin treatment. , 2005, Human reproduction.

[16]  B. Mol,et al.  Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[17]  D. Seifer,et al.  Serum antimüllerian hormone/müllerian-inhibiting substance appears to be a more discriminatory marker of assisted reproductive technology outcome than follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, or estradiol. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[18]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Intercycle variability of ovarian reserve tests: results of a prospective randomized study. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[19]  K. Biberoğlu,et al.  Comparison of Basal and Clomiphene Citrate Induced FSH and Inhibin B, Ovarian Volume and Antral Follicle Counts as Ovarian Reserve Tests and Predictors of Poor Ovarian Response in IVF , 2004, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[20]  Y. Hsieh,et al.  Clinical Assisted Reproduction: Antral Follicle Counting in Predicting the Retrieved Oocyte Number After Ovarian Hyperstimulation , 2001, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[21]  T. Toth,et al.  CLINICAL ASSISTED REPRODUCTION: Antral Follicle Assessment as a Tool for Predicting Outcome in IVF—Is it a Better Predictor than Age and FSH? , 2004, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[22]  J. Habbema,et al.  Impact of repeated antral follicle counts on the prediction of poor ovarian response in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[23]  M. Soules,et al.  Reproductive aging and variability in the ovarian antral follicle count: application in the clinical setting. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[24]  J. Segars,et al.  A prospective assessment of the predictive value of basal antral follicles in in vitro fertilization cycles. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[25]  J. Habbema,et al.  Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[26]  S. Campbell,et al.  Intraobserver and interobserver variability of ovarian volume, gray‐scale and color flow indices obtained using transvaginal three‐dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[27]  R. Fanchin,et al.  Serum anti-Müllerian hormone is more strongly related to ovarian follicular status than serum inhibin B, estradiol, FSH and LH on day 3. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[28]  A. Kurjak,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasonographic ovarian measurements and in vitro fertilization outcome are related to age. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[29]  D. Baird,et al.  Prospective analysis of the relationships between the ovarian follicle cohort and basal FSH concentration, the inhibin response to exogenous FSH and ovarian follicle number at different stages of the normal menstrual cycle and after pituitary down-regulation. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[30]  F. V. van Leeuwen,et al.  A low number of retrieved oocytes at in vitro fertilization treatment is predictive of early menopause. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.

[31]  J. Habbema,et al.  Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.

[32]  R. Schild,et al.  The role of ovarian volume in an in vitro fertilization programme as assessed by 3D ultrasound , 2001, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[33]  P C Ho,et al.  The significance of the number of antral follicles prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian responses in an IVF programme. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[34]  R. Scott,et al.  Basal antral follicle number and mean ovarian diameter predict cycle cancellation and ovarian responsiveness in assisted reproductive technology cycles. , 2000, Fertility and sterility.

[35]  J. Habbema,et al.  Antral follicle counts by transvaginal ultrasonography are related to age in women with proven natural fertility. , 1999, Fertility and sterility.

[36]  S. Campbell,et al.  The pattern of changes in ovarian stromal and uterine artery blood flow velocities during in vitro fertilization treatment and its relationship with outcome of the cycle , 1999, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[37]  S. Campbell,et al.  Value of ovarian stromal blood flow velocity measurement after pituitary suppression in the prediction of ovarian responsiveness and outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment. , 1999, Fertility and sterility.

[38]  A. Gougeon.  Ovarian follicular growth in humans: ovarian ageing and population of growing follicles. , 1998, Maturitas.

[39]  Y. Soong,et al.  Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. , 1998, Fertility and sterility.

[40]  K. Oktay,et al.  Ontogeny of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene expression in isolated human ovarian follicles. , 1997, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[41]  S. Nishikawa,et al.  Stepwise requirement of c-kit tyrosine kinase in mouse ovarian follicle development. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[42]  J. Skull,et al.  Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[43]  H. Martikainen,et al.  Pretreatment transvaginal ultrasound examination predicts ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophins in in-vitro fertilization. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[44]  S. Campbell,et al.  Relationship of Ovarian Stromal Blood Flow at the Baseline Ultrasound Scan to Subsequent Follicular Response in an In Vitro Fertilization Program , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[45]  A. Gougeon.  Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: facts and hypotheses. , 1996, Endocrine reviews.

[46]  B. V. Van Voorhis,et al.  Ovarian volume: a novel outcome predictor for assisted reproduction. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[47]  E. Huang,et al.  The murine steel panda mutation affects kit ligand expression and growth of early ovarian follicles. , 1993, Developmental biology.

[48]  T. G. Baker.  A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries , 1963, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.