Structural consequences of subchondral bone involvement in segmental osteonecrosis of the femoral head

Appearance of a crescent sign usually marks the onset of necrotic femoral head collapse, but very little is known about which local factors contribute most critically to avoiding or postponing fracture of at‐risk juxtaarticular cancellous bone. A three‐dimensional finite element model was used to test the hypothesis that an initially mechanically uncompromised subchondral plate could provide a substantial degree of stress protection to a weakened underlying segmental infarction. The computational simulation of osteonecrosis showed that the principal stress distribution for an assumption of subchondral plate weakening (given also an underlying, comparably weakened segmental infarction) differed inappreciably from that of a normal femoral head. However, the tendency for local structural failure, as reflected in the ratio of stress to strength, was substantially higher in the former instance. If, instead, the mechanical integrity of the subchondral plate overlying the weakened segmental infarction was assumed to be preserved, computed stress levels in the at‐risk subjacent necrotic cancellous bone were still over 70% as high as for the weakened‐plate case. The data thus indicate that even a fully normal subchondral plate can provide only modest stress protection of a weakened underlying segmental infarction, whereas weakening of the necrotic cancellous bone throughout the infarction induces marked stress increase in the overlying subchondral plate. These findings suggest that the onset of collapse is probably dominated much more strongly by the degree of structural degradation of the cancellous bone within the main infarct body, than by the degree of structural degradation within the subchondral plate.

[1]  T D Brown,et al.  A non-linear finite element analysis of some early collapse processes in femoral head osteonecrosis. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  J. Schreiman,et al.  Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Accuracy compared with radiographs, core biopsy, and intraosseous pressure measurements. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  D. Phemister Treatment of the necrotic head of the femur in adults. , 1949, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  T D Brown,et al.  Pre-collapse stress redistributions in femoral head osteonecrosis--a three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  J. Trueta,et al.  The normal vascular anatomy of the femoral head in adult man. , 1953, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Failure surfaces for cellular materials under multiaxial loads—I.Modelling , 1989 .

[8]  I L Paul,et al.  A comparison of the dynamic force transmitting properties of subchondral bone and articular cartilage. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  M. Hinsenkamp,et al.  The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  R M Rose,et al.  Quantitative studies of human subchondral cancellous bone. Its relationship to the state of its overlying cartilage. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  D R Pedersen,et al.  An axisymmetric model of acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  W. Enneking,et al.  The silent hip in idiopathic aseptic necrosis. Treatment by bone-grafting. , 1973, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  Glimcher Mj,et al.  Pathogenesis of idiopathic osteonecrosis: the ubiquitous crescent sign. , 1985, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[14]  R. D. Wood,et al.  Stress analysis of human femur with implanted Charnley prosthesis. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  T D Brown,et al.  The apparent elastic modulus of the juxtaricular subchondral bone of the femoral head , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  W H Harris,et al.  Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur. An in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip-replacement femoral components. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  T. Brown,et al.  Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[18]  T D Brown,et al.  Stress transmission anomalies in femoral heads altered by aseptic necrosis. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  K. Brandt,et al.  Apparent avascular necrosis of the hip: appearance and spontaneous resolution of MR findings in renal allograft recipients. , 1991, Radiology.

[20]  Ernest L. Hall,et al.  Computer Image Processing and Recognition , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[21]  L. Herrmann,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Legg‐Calve‐Perthes Disease , 1982, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[22]  W C Hayes,et al.  Mechanical properties of metaphyseal bone in the proximal femur. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  T D Brown,et al.  In vitro contact stress distributions in the natural human hip. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.