Notes from the underground city of disinformation: A conceptual investigation

Inaccurate information, in the field of library and information science, is often regarded as a problem that needs to be corrected or simply understood as either misinformation or disinformation without further consideration. Misinformation and disinformation, however, may cause significant problems for users in online environments, where they are constantly exposed to an abundance of inaccurate and/or misleading information. This paper aims to establish conceptual groundwork for future empirical research by examining the relationships among information, misinformation, and disinformation. Our analysis extends to a discussion of cues to deception, as means for detecting misinformation and disinformation. We argue that misinformation and disinformation are related yet distinct sub-categories of information. Misinformation is a multifaceted concept, more complex than simply being inaccurate or incomplete, and disinformation does not always entail misinformation. We conclude our discussion by highlighting the significant roles of context and time in defining misinformation and disinformation.

[1]  Christina Courtright.  Context in information behavior research , 2007 .

[2]  William B. Frakes,et al.  Information and misinformation: An investigation of the notions of information, misinformation, informing, and misinforming , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[3]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Trust in digital information , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Linda C. Smith,et al.  Known-Item Search: Variations on a Concept , 2007, ASIST.

[5]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  On the Difference or Equality of Information, Misinformation, and Disinformation: A Critical Research Perspective , 2006, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[6]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Cues to deception. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Kimmo Tuominen,et al.  "Isms" in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism , 2005, J. Documentation.

[8]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Truth and investment: lies are told to those who care. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Dongsong Zhang,et al.  An Ontology-Supported Misinformation Model: Toward a Digital Misinformation Library , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[10]  P. Hernon.  Disinformation and misinformation through the internet: Findings of an exploratory study , 1995 .

[11]  Jin Ha Lee,et al.  How incorrect information delivers correct search results: A pragmatic analysis of queries , 2007, ASIST.

[12]  Jeffrey J. Walczyk,et al.  The Creativity of Lying: Divergent Thinking and Ideational Correlates of the Resolution of Social Dilemmas , 2008 .

[13]  Paul A. Studer,et al.  Information science and the phenomenon of information , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  B. Clifford.  Detecting lies and deceit: the psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice , 2001 .

[15]  Victoria L. Rubin.  On deception and deception detection: Content analysis of computer-mediated stated beliefs , 2010, ASIST.

[16]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[17]  Jacquelyn A. Burkell,et al.  Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Information: Objective or subjective/situational? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Peter M. Bednar,et al.  Bias, Misinformation and the Paradox of Neutrality , 2008, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[20]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  Is Semantic Information Meaningful Data? , 2005, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

[21]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[22]  Elizabeth D. Liddy,et al.  Assessing Credibility of Weblogs , 2006, AAAI Spring Symposium: Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs.

[23]  Alex Black,et al.  Truths, Lies, and Equivocations: The Effects of Conflicting Goals on Discourse , 1990 .

[24]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  The measurement and evaluation of library services , 1977 .

[25]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal Deception Theory , 1996 .

[26]  Charles S. Taber,et al.  Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs , 2006 .

[27]  Robert M. Losee,et al.  A Discipline Independent Definition of Information , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Victoria L. Rubin.  Trust Incident Account Model: Preliminary Indicators for Trust Rhetoric and Trust or Distrust in Blogs , 2009, ICWSM.

[29]  D. Fallis.  A Conceptual Analysis of Disinformation , 2009 .

[30]  Stephen Marsh,et al.  The role of trust in information science and technology , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  G. Piccinini,et al.  Information without Truth , 2010 .

[32]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  The elements of computer credibility , 1999, CHI '99.

[33]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Theory and metatheory of information science: a new interpretation , 1998, J. Documentation.

[34]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Information as thing , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[35]  James H. Moor,et al.  Knowledge and the Flow of Information. , 1982 .

[36]  L. Floridi.  Semantic Information and the Correctness Theory of Truth , 2010 .

[37]  J. Nunamaker,et al.  Automating Linguistics-Based Cues for Detecting Deception in Text-Based Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communications , 2004 .

[38]  William P. Alston,et al.  Knowledge and the Flow of Information , 1985 .