Incidence and timing of potentially high-risk arrhythmias detected through long term continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring

BackgroundAmbulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring is the standard to screen for high-risk arrhythmias. We evaluated the clinical utility of a novel, leadless electrode, single-patient-use ECG monitor that stores up to 14 days of a continuous recording to measure the burden and timing of potentially high-risk arrhythmias.MethodsWe examined data from 122,815 long term continuous ambulatory monitors (iRhythm ZIO® Service, San Francisco) prescribed from 2011 to 2013 and categorized potentially high-risk arrhythmias into two types: (1) ventricular arrhythmias including non-sustained and sustained ventricular tachycardia and (2) bradyarrhythmias including sinus pauses >3 s, atrial fibrillation pauses >5 s, and high-grade heart block (Mobitz Type II or third-degree heart block).ResultsOf 122,815 ZIO® recordings, median wear time was 9.9 (IQR 6.8–13.8) days and median analyzable time was 9.1 (IQR 6.4–13.1) days. There were 22,443 (18.3 %) with at least one episode of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), 238 (0.2 %) with sustained VT, 1766 (1.4 %) with a sinus pause >3 s (SP), 520 (0.4 %) with a pause during atrial fibrillation >5 s (AFP), and 1486 (1.2 %) with high-grade heart block (HGHB). Median time to first arrhythmia was 74 h (IQR 26–149 h) for NSVT, 22 h (IQR 5–73 h) for sustained VT, 22 h (IQR 7–64 h) for SP, 31 h (IQR 11–82 h) for AFP, and 40 h (SD 10–118 h) for HGHB.ConclusionsA significant percentage of potentially high-risk arrhythmias are not identified within 48-h of ambulatory ECG monitoring. Longer-term continuous ambulatory ECG monitoring provides incremental detection of these potentially clinically relevant arrhythmic events.

[1]  George C M Siontis,et al.  Prognostic significance of ambulatory ECG monitoring for ventricular arrhythmias. , 2013, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[2]  David J Gladstone,et al.  Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  E. Topol,et al.  Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring. , 2014, The American journal of medicine.

[4]  Martin O'Donnell,et al.  After Acute Ischemic Stroke : A Systematic Review Noninvasive Cardiac Monitoring for Detecting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter , 2007 .

[5]  E. Grossi BMC Cardiovascular Disorders , 2007 .

[6]  A. Go,et al.  Detection of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation by 30-Day Event Monitoring in Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke: The Stroke and Monitoring for PAF in Real Time (SMART) Registry , 2012, Stroke.

[7]  Raymond C S Seet,et al.  Prolonged Rhythm Monitoring for the Detection of Occult Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Ischemic Stroke of Unknown Cause , 2011, Circulation.

[8]  M. Turakhia,et al.  Diagnostic utility of a novel leadless arrhythmia monitoring device. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  Claudia Stöllberger,et al.  Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[10]  A. Capucci,et al.  Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Reiffel,et al.  Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24-hour Holter monitors for arrhythmia detection. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  Firat Duru,et al.  Long-term continuous external electrocardiographic recording: a review. , 2006, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  Steven Higgins,et al.  Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring for Discharged Emergency Department Patients with Possible Cardiac Arrhythmias , 2014, The western journal of emergency medicine.

[14]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  Noninvasive Cardiac Event Monitoring to Detect Atrial Fibrillation After Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2013, Stroke.

[15]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemaker , 2008, Circulation.

[16]  Jonathan H Seltzer,et al.  The Diagnosis of Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Prospective Multi‐Center Randomized Study Comparing Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry Versus Standard Loop Event Monitoring , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[17]  J. Alpert,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography). , 1999, Circulation.