A Prospective Study of Patients Undergoing Breast Reduction Surgery: Health-Related Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes

Background: This study assessed the health-related quality of life experienced by breast reduction patients using four reliable and validated health-related quality-of-life measures. Methods: Consecutive patients with breast hypertrophy completed the Health Utilities Index Mark 2, the Health Utilities Index Mark 3, and the Breast Reduction Assessment Value and Outcomes instruments (the Short Form 36, the Multidimensional Body-Self Rating Questionnaire Appearance Assessment, and the Breast-Related Symptom Questionnaire) at 1 week and 1 day before surgery and at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: For the 52 patients in the study, mean scores for all quality-of-life instruments increased from the preoperative assessments to the postoperative assessments. The mean quality-adjusted life years gained per patient because of the surgery was 0.12 during the 1-year follow-up period. There was a positive relationship (p < 0.001) between breast resection weight and body mass index. However, body mass index and tissue resection weight were not significantly associated with Health Utilities Index Mark 3 change scores (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Patients who undergo breast reduction experience an important improvement in health-related quality of life according to four established measures. The improvement is most noticeable between 1 day before surgery and 1 month after surgery, after which it stabilizes for up to 1 year. The health-related quality-of-life effect of the surgery translates into an expected lifetime gain of 5.32 quality-adjusted life years, which is equivalent to each patient living an additional 5.32 years in perfect health. The authors conclude that there is no justification for the ongoing restriction or denials of third-party payments based on body mass index.

[1]  W. Furlong,et al.  Methodology and measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments: A prospective study of patients undergoing breast reduction surgery , 2005, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[2]  S. Morris,et al.  Prospective Study of Outcomes after Reduction Mammaplasty , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  D. Wagner,et al.  The Influence of Obesity and Volume of Resection on Success in Reduction Mammaplasty: An Outcomes Study , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  B. O'brien,et al.  A Methodological Guide to Performing a Cost-Utility Study Comparing Surgical Techniques , 2004, The Canadian journal of plastic surgery = Journal canadien de chirurgie plastique.

[5]  H. Becker Breast reduction insurance denials. , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  Y. Brandberg,et al.  Three-Year Follow-Up on Clinical Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life after Reduction Mammaplasty , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  D. Feeny,et al.  Is the Health Utilities Index responsive in total hip arthroplasty patients? , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  D. Feeny,et al.  The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): concepts, measurement properties and applications , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[9]  L. Casas,et al.  Reduction Mammaplasty Is a Functional Operation, Improving Quality of Life in Symptomatic Women: A Prospective, SingleCenter Breast Reduction Outcome Study , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  H. Francis,et al.  Impact of Cochlear Implants on the Functional Health Status of Older Adults , 2002, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  J. Lowery,et al.  Reduction Mammaplasty: Defining Medical Necessity , 2002, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[12]  J. Lowery,et al.  The Effectiveness of Surgical and Nonsurgical Interventions in Relieving the Symptoms of Macromastia , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  M. Boyle,et al.  Multiattribute and Single‐Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System , 2002, Medical care.

[14]  J. Lowery,et al.  The Health Burden of Breast Hypertrophy , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  E. Collins,et al.  An Internet‐Based Utility Assessment of Breast Hypertrophy , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  J. Bain,et al.  Review of Data Describing Outcomes That Are Used to Assess Changes in Quality of Life after Reduction Mammaplasty , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  D. Feeny,et al.  The Health Utilities Index (HUI®) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies , 2001, Annals of medicine.

[18]  M. Drummond Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies , 2001, Annals of medicine.

[19]  Y. Brandberg,et al.  Reduction Mammaplasty Provides Long-Term Improvement in Health Status and Quality of Life , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  A. Tosteson,et al.  Measuring Health State Preferences in Women with Breast Hypertrophy , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[21]  D. Feeny,et al.  Health Utilities Index Mark 3: evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey. , 2000, Medical care.

[22]  K. Postle,et al.  A qualitative study of patients' views on the effects of breast-reduction surgery: a 2-year follow-up survey. , 1999, British journal of plastic surgery.

[23]  R. Horch,et al.  [Quality of life after breast reduction-plasty]. , 1999, Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V....

[24]  M. King The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 , 1996, Quality of Life Research.

[25]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Should breast reduction surgery be rationed? A comparison of the health status of patients before and after treatment: postal questionnaire survey , 1996, BMJ.

[26]  D. Feeny,et al.  Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. , 1996, Medical care.

[27]  Thomas F. Cash,et al.  Body Images: Development, Deviance, and Change , 1991 .

[28]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Schools, Classrooms, and Pupils: International Studies of Schooling from a Multilevel Perspective , 1991 .

[29]  D. Feeny,et al.  Utilities and Quality-Adjusted Life Years , 1989, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[30]  K. Wintsch A new technique for reduction mammaplasty , 1978, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[31]  R. Goldwyn,et al.  Reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique. An alternative to free nipple and areola grafting for severe macromastia or extreme ptosis. , 1977, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[32]  T. Robbins A REDUCTION MAMMAPLASTY WITH THE AREOLA‐NIPPLE BASED ON AN INFERIOR DERMAL PEDICLE , 1977, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[33]  R. Ruberg Prospective Study of Outcomes After Reduction Mammaplasty , 2007 .

[34]  J. Ware SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide , 2003 .

[35]  H. Hietanen,et al.  Patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction and reduction mammaplasty. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[36]  James T. Thompson,et al.  REDUCTION MAMMAPLASTY BY THE INFERIOR PEDICLE TECHNIQUE , 1998 .

[37]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 Health Survey. , 1990 .

[38]  F W Pirruccello,et al.  Plastic and reconstructive surgery. , 1967, IMJ. Illinois medical journal.