Dysfunctional Tear Syndrome: A Delphi Approach to Treatment Recommendations

Purpose: To develop current treatment recommendations for dry eye disease from consensus of expert advice. Methods: Of 25 preselected international specialists on dry eye, 17 agreed to participate in a modified, 2-round Delphi panel approach. Based on available literature and standards of care, a survey was presented to each panelist. A two-thirds majority was used for consensus building from responses obtained. Treatment algorithms were created. Treatment recommendations for different types and severity levels of dry eye disease were the main outcome. Results: A new term for dry eye disease was proposed: dysfunctional tear syndrome (DTS). Treatment recommendations were based primarily on patient symptoms and signs. Available diagnostic tests were considered of secondary importance in guiding therapy. Development of algorithms was based on the presence or absence of lid margin disease and disturbances of tear distribution and clearance. Disease severity was considered the most important factor for treatment decision-making and was categorized into 4 levels. Severity was assessed on the basis of tear substitute requirements, symptoms of ocular discomfort, and visual disturbance. Clinical signs present in lids, tear film, conjunctiva, and cornea were also used for categorization of severity. Consensus was reached on treatment algorithms for DTS with and without concurrent lid disease. Conclusion: Panelist opinion relied on symptoms and signs (not tests) for selection of treatment strategies. Therapy is chosen to match disease severity and presence versus absence of lid margin disease or tear distribution and clearance disturbances.

[1]  S. Desselle,et al.  The Impact of the Internet on Community Pharmacy Practice , 2003, Health marketing quarterly.

[2]  A. Richter,et al.  Delphi panel study of current hypertension treatment patterns. , 2001, Clinical therapeutics.

[3]  M A Lemp,et al.  Epidemiology and classification of dry eye. , 1998, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[4]  A. Berghold,et al.  Evaluation of the clinical course of dry eye syndrome. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  C. Baudouin The pathology of dry eye. , 2001, Survey of ophthalmology.

[6]  R. Hughes Definitions for public health nutrition: a developing consensus , 2003, Public Health Nutrition.

[7]  C M Goodman,et al.  The Delphi technique: a critique. , 1987, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  Christopher Snyder,et al.  The relationship between habitual patient-reported symptoms and clinical signs among patients with dry eye of varying severity. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  J. Buring,et al.  Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  C. Powell The Delphi technique: myths and realities. , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.

[11]  J. George,et al.  Do guidelines improve the process and outcomes of care in delirium? , 2003, Age and ageing.

[12]  U. Werneke,et al.  An evidence and consensus based guideline for acute diarrhoea management , 2001, Archives of disease in childhood.

[13]  A. Bron,et al.  Grading Of Corneal and Conjunctival Staining in the Context of Other Dry Eye Tests , 2003, Cornea.

[14]  C. Willet,et al.  Patterns of care study decision tree and management guidelines for esophageal cancer. American College of Radiology. , 1998, Radiation medicine.

[15]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Osteoarthritis antirheumatic drug trials. III. Setting the delta for clinical trials--results of a consensus development (Delphi) exercise. , 1992, The Journal of rheumatology.

[16]  J N Pelton The future of telecommunications: a Delphi survey. , 1981, The Journal of communication.

[17]  J. Cantrill,et al.  Preventing drug‐related morbidity – the development of quality indicators , 2003, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[18]  S. Kaye,et al.  A randomised, crossover, multicentre study to compare the performance of 0.1% (w/v) sodium hyaluronate with 1.4% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol in the alleviation of symptoms associated with dry eye syndrome , 2002, Eye.

[19]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis antirheumatic drug trials. III. Setting the delta for clinical trials of antirheumatic drugs--results of a consensus development (Delphi) exercise. , 1991, The Journal of rheumatology.

[20]  T. Matsuo,et al.  Trehalose eye drops in the treatment of dry eye syndrome. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[21]  B. Munoz,et al.  Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  P. Shekelle,et al.  The effect of panel membership and feedback on ratings in a two-round Delphi survey: results of a randomized controlled trial. , 1999, Medical care.

[23]  Ching-Yu Cheng,et al.  Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[24]  M. Lemp Evaluation and differential diagnosis of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. , 2000, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[25]  L. Nelson,et al.  Dry eye signs and symptoms in women with premature ovarian failure. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  S. Pflugfelder,et al.  Assessing the severity of keratitis sicca with videokeratoscopic indices. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[27]  S. Pflugfelder Antiinflammatory therapy for dry eye. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  S. Pflugfelder Anti-inflammatory therapy of dry eye. , 2003, The ocular surface.

[29]  R. Mathis,et al.  A Quality Mix: Using Evidence and Experience to Evaluate New Technologies , 2003, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[30]  H. Brewitt,et al.  Dry eye disease: the scale of the problem. , 2001, Survey of ophthalmology.

[31]  C. Margolis,et al.  Is Consensus Reproducible?: A Study of an Algorithmic Guidelines Development Process , 1995, Medical care.

[32]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[33]  M. Lemp Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. , 1995, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[34]  L. Leape,et al.  Reliability of Clinical Guideline Development Using Mail-Only versus In-Person Expert Panels , 2003, Medical care.

[35]  J. Murube,et al.  The Madrid triple classification of dry eye. , 2003, Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia.

[36]  R. Brook,et al.  Reliability of panel-based guidelines for colonoscopy: an international comparison. , 1998, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.