Age differences in brain activity during perceptual versus reflective attention

This functional magnetic resonance imaging study presented participants with a face and scene simultaneously on each trial, and assessed the impact of perceptual versus reflective selective attention on activity in parahippocampal place area. Young and older adults showed equivalent activation in parahippocampal place area when cued to attend to the scene when the stimuli were perceptually present and when cued to refresh (briefly think about) the scene after the stimuli were no longer present. The groups also showed equivalent deactivation when cued to attend to the face when the stimuli were perceptually present. However, older adults showed less deactivation than young adults when cued to refresh the face, providing evidence for greater age-related disruption of reflective than perceptual selective attention.

[1]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  W. Johnson,et al.  Handbook of Aging and Cognition , 2008 .

[3]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Aging reduces neural specialization in ventral visual cortex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Top–Down Enhancement and Suppression of Activity in Category-selective Extrastriate Cortex from an Act of Reflective Attention , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view" , 2007 .

[6]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Variation in working memory , 2008 .

[7]  Cindy Lustig,et al.  Evidence for frontally mediated controlled processing differences in older adults. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Age and inhibition: the retrieval of situation models. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[9]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Neuroimaging of Healthy Cognitive Aging , 2011 .

[10]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Neural Suppression of Irrelevant Information Underlies Optimal Working Memory Performance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Inhibition in Cognition , 2007 .

[12]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  The consequence of refreshing for access to nonselected items in young and older adults , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Zara M. Bergström,et al.  Behavioral and ERP evidence of greater distractor processing in old age , 2009, Brain Research.

[14]  F. Craik,et al.  Aging, memory, and frontal lobe functioning. , 2002 .

[15]  Michael W. L. Chee,et al.  Age-related Changes in Object Processing and Contextual Binding Revealed Using fMR Adaptation , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Knight,et al.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  The mind and brain of short-term memory. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  D. Stuss,et al.  Principles of frontal lobe function , 2002 .

[20]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Second Thoughts versus Second Looks: An Age-Related Deficit in Reflectively Refreshing Just-Activated Information , 2002, Psychological science.

[21]  C. Lustig,et al.  Inhibitory Mechanisms and the Control of Attention , 2007 .

[22]  Robert C. Welsh,et al.  Decreased neural specialization in old adults on a working memory task , 2006, Neuroreport.

[23]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Refreshing One of Several Active Representations: Behavioral and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Differences between Young and Older Adults , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Robert A. Koeppe,et al.  Age Differences in Behavior and PET Activation Reveal Differences in Interference Resolution in Verbal Working Memory , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Denise C. Park,et al.  A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[26]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  S. Connelly,et al.  Age and reading: the impact of distraction. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[28]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article An Age-Related Deficit in Prefrontal Cortical Function Associated With Refreshing Information , 2022 .

[29]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Neuroimaging a Single Thought: Dorsolateral PFC Activity Associated with Refreshing Just-Activated Information , 2002, NeuroImage.