Late Entrant Strategies in Technological Ecologies

Abstract This paper examines the way in which Microsoft, a late entrant in the browser market, was able to exploit linkages between the complementary elements forming a technological ecology in order to overcome the lock-in advantages initially enjoyed by Netscape. The case study forces us to critically appraise three related research questions. First, what strategies can be employed by late market entrants to overcome the lock-in advantages enjoyed by dominant incumbents? Second, are cooperative alliances preferable to the in-house, cross-product optimization of interrelated technologies? Third, is there a tendency for unbundling over the course of the industry life cycle? A coupled Polya Urn model is developed in order to clarify the strategies employed by Microsoft and Netscape in the browser wars. The findings highlight the gains from leveraging installed user bases across interrelated product markets, with cross-product optimization being a key source of strategic advantage for firms competing in technological ecologies.

[1]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[2]  P. David Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[3]  G. Dosi,et al.  On “badly behaved” dynamics , 1994 .

[4]  Steven P. Schnaars Managing Imitation Strategies: How Later Entrants Seize Markets from Pioneers , 1994 .

[5]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[6]  Alan Kirman,et al.  The economy as an evolving network , 1997 .

[7]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[8]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[9]  Stan J. Liebowitz,et al.  The Fable of the Keys , 1990, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[10]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Competing On Internet Time: Lessons From Netscape And Its Battle With Microsoft , 1998 .

[11]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure , 1987 .

[12]  Sumit K. Majumdar,et al.  Network effects and the adoption of new technology: evidence from the U.S. telecommunications industry , 1998 .

[13]  Paul Windrum,et al.  Networks, Noise and Web Navigation: Sustaining Metcalfe's Law through Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[14]  R. Garud,et al.  Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of sun microsystems' open systems strategy , 1993 .

[15]  G. Dosi,et al.  Competing Technologies, International Diffusion and the Rate of Convergence to a Stable Market Structure , 1998 .

[16]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[17]  E. McDonough Managing imitation strategies: How later entrants seize markets from pioneers , 1995 .