A Cognitive Model of Document Use During a Research Project. Study II. Decisions at the Reading and Citing Stages

This article reports on the follow-up study of a two-part project designed to study the decision-making process underlying how academic researchers select documents retrieved from online databases, consult or read, and cite documents during a research project. The participants are 15 of the 25 agricultural economics users who participated in the original study of document-selection conducted in 1992. They were interviewed about subsequent decisions on documents considered relevant and selected in 1992, as well as documents cited in their written products but not in the original searches. Of particular interest in this article are the decision criteria and rules they apply to documents as they progress through the project. The first study in 1992 emphasized the selection processes and resulted in a document selection model; the 1995 study concentrates on the reading and citing decisions. The model derived from this project shows document use as a decision-making process with decisions occurring at three points or stages during a research project: selecting, reading, and citing. It is an expansion of the document selection model developed in the 1992 study, identifies more criteria, and clarifies the criteria and rules that are in use at each stage. The follow-up study not only found that all but one of the criteria identified in selection re-occur in connection with reading and citing decisions, but also identified 14 new criteria. It also found that decision rules applied in selection decisions are applied throughout the project.

[1]  Michael J. Moravcsik,et al.  Variation of the nature of citation measures with journals and scientific specialties , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Michael B. Eisenberg,et al.  A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..

[3]  B. Brehmer.  Chapter 1 The Development of Social Judgment Theory , 1988 .

[4]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication , 1984 .

[5]  Stephen I. Cohen,et al.  Information Flow in Research and Development Laboratories. , 1969 .

[6]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[7]  Carol L. Barry.  User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study , 1994 .

[8]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  What's the use of citation? Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences , 1995, J. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting? , 1975 .

[10]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Author motivation for not citing influences: A methodological note , 1988 .

[11]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  M. R. Winston,et al.  : Black Academic Libraries and Research Collections: An Historical Survey , 1979 .

[13]  T. Brooks.  Evidence of complex citer motivations , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Stephen P. Harter.  Variations in relevance assessments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness , 1996 .

[15]  Patricia A. Hooten.  Frequency and Functional Use of Cited Documents in Information Science. , 1991 .

[16]  O. Svenson.  Process descriptions of decision making. , 1979 .

[17]  Scott T. Allison,et al.  A Cluster-Analytic Approach Toward Identifying the Structure and Content of Human Decision Making , 1992 .

[18]  E. Brunswik,et al.  The Conceptual Framework of Psychology , 1954 .

[19]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau.  Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. , 1991 .

[20]  M. White,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Citing Behavior: Contributions, Criteria, and Metalevel Documentation Concerns , 1997, The Library Quarterly.

[21]  Jessie Carney Smith,et al.  Black Academic Libraries and Research Collections: An Historical Survey , 1977 .

[22]  Terrence A. Brooks,et al.  Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Mengxiong Liu,et al.  Progress in Documentation the Complexities of citation Practice: a Review of citation studies , 1993, J. Documentation.

[24]  Stefano Mizzaro.  Relevance: the whole history , 1997 .

[25]  I. Spiegel-Rosing.  Science Studies: Bibliometric and Content Analysis , 1977 .

[26]  Peiling Wang,et al.  Document Selection and Relevance Assessments during a Research Project. , 1997 .