Unequal Weber fractions for the categorization of brief temporal intervals

How constant is the Weber fraction (WF) for brief time intervals? This question was assessed in three experiments with two base durations (BDs), 0.2 and 1 sec, and with different ways of estimating the WF. In Experiment 1, the psychometric functions were drawn on the basis of 4, 8, or 12 comparison intervals with the shortest to longest duration ranges being kept constant. The results revealed no effect of the number of intervals, but the WF (threshold/BD) was significantly lower at 0.2 sec. In Experiment 2, the comparison intervals were distributed over three duration ranges. There was no range effect, and the WF was generally lower at 0.2 sec than at 1 sec. In Experiment 3, one condition allowed a comparison of the BD with the same range between the shortest and longest comparison intervals. Once again, the WF was lower at 0.2 sec than at 1 sec. Overall, the results reveal (1) that increasing the number of comparison intervals or the duration range does not seem to affect the value of the WF and (2) that the WF is lower at 0.2 sec than at 1 sec, which is inconsistent with the scalar property of some timing models.

[1]  S. Grondin.  Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[2]  John E. Schlerf,et al.  Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  M. R. Jones,et al.  Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. , 1976, Psychological review.

[4]  P. Barker,et al.  High Affinity Not in the Vicinity? , 2007, Neuron.

[5]  R M Church,et al.  Scalar Timing in Memory , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  C J Darwin,et al.  Duration discrimination in a series of rhythmic events , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  J. Devin McAuley,et al.  Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: a comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short-interval timing. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Philippe Lavoie,et al.  Information processing limitations as revealed by temporal discrimination , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  C. C. Pratt,et al.  The Weber ratio for intensive discrimination. , 1936 .

[10]  J. Devin McAuley,et al.  Time judgments in global temporal contexts , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  N. Ehrlé,et al.  Auditory discrimination of anisochrony: Influence of the tempo and musical backgrounds of listeners , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  P R Killeen,et al.  Optimal timing and the Weber function. , 1987, Psychological review.

[13]  Sergio Cesare Masin.  THE (WEBER’S) LAW THAT NEVER WAS , 2009 .

[14]  Thomas Rammsayer,et al.  Neuropharmacological Approaches to Human Timing , 2008 .

[15]  J. Gibbon.  Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[16]  J. Gibbon.  Origins of scalar timing , 1991 .

[17]  J. Wearden,et al.  Scalar Properties in Human Timing: Conformity and Violations , 2006 .

[18]  Fred L. Steinberg,et al.  Functional MRI reveals the existence of modality and coordination-dependent timing networks , 2005, NeuroImage.

[19]  Simon Grondin,et al.  When to start explicit counting in a time-intervals discrimination task: A critical point in the timing process of humans. , 1999 .

[20]  E. Large,et al.  The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. , 1999 .

[21]  Paul Fraisse,et al.  TIME AND RHYTHM PERCEPTION , 1978 .

[22]  J. Wearden,et al.  Scalar Properties in Animal Timing: Conformity and Violations , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  J. Wearden,et al.  Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans. , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[24]  R. Church.  A concise introduction to scalar timing theory. , 2003 .

[25]  John H. Wearden,et al.  Changing Sensitivity to Duration in Human Scalar Timing: An Experiment, a Review, and Some Possible Explanations , 1997 .

[26]  S. Grondin,et al.  TEMPORAL PROCESSING, RANGE EFFECT AND WEBER FRACTION , 2009 .

[27]  S. Grondin,et al.  From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  J. Wearden,et al.  Manipulating decision processes in the human scalar timing system , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[29]  Josey Y. M. Chu,et al.  The failure of Weber's law in time perception and production , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[30]  M. R. Jones,et al.  Dynamic attending and responses to time. , 1989, Psychological review.

[31]  U. Karmarkar,et al.  Timing in the Absence of Clocks: Encoding Time in Neural Network States , 2007, Neuron.

[32]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Spatially Localized Distortions of Event Time , 2006, Current Biology.

[33]  Dean V Buonomano,et al.  The biology of time across different scales. , 2007, Nature chemical biology.

[34]  R M Church,et al.  Temporal generalization. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[35]  David J. Getty,et al.  Discrimination of short temporal intervals: A comparison of two models , 1975 .

[36]  David L Gilden,et al.  Contraction of time in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. , 2009, Neuropsychology.

[37]  S. McKee,et al.  The use of an implicit standard for measuring discrimination thresholds , 2000, Vision Research.

[38]  J. Wearden,et al.  Stimulus Range Effects in Temporal Bisection by Humans , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.