An evaluation of the endoscopic surgical skills assessment using a video analysis software program

BackgroundsRecently, the endoscopic surgical skills of surgeons have become a focus of many investigators and society as a whole. Hence, the importance of the training and education programs used to ensure safer endoscopic surgery has been gradually increasing. We developed our own motion analysis system called the HUESAD, and already demonstrated its construct validity. In this study, we verified that another motion analysis system (which uses the Dartfish Software program) could assess surgeons’ endoscopic surgical skills.MethodsExperts (who had performed more than 100 laparoscopic surgeries) and novices (who had no experience performing laparoscopic surgery) were recruited for this study. The task was suturing in a dry box trainer. The time and the locus tracing of both sides’ needle holders were analyzed using the new video analysis system (Dartfish Software).ResultsThere were statistically significant differences between the experts and novices in all three variables assessed (task time: p = 0.0011, the locus tracing of the left sides’ needle holders: p = 0.0011, the locus tracing of the right sides’ needle holders: p = 0.0011).ConclusionsThe results of this study demonstrated that the results of the motion analysis by the Dartfish Software were well correlated with the surgeon’s skill level.

[1]  Nicholas Marlow,et al.  The efficacy of laparoscopic skills training in a Mobile Simulation Unit compared with a fixed site: a comparative study , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  M. Pellen,et al.  Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[3]  A. Duffy,et al.  Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[4]  S. Botden,et al.  Augmented versus Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Simulation: What Is the Difference? , 2007, World journal of surgery.

[5]  Joshua A Rucci,et al.  Three Types of Kinematic Feedback and the Execution of the Hang Power Clean , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[6]  T. Kawahara,et al.  The importance of stressing the use of laparoscopic instruments in the initial training for laparoscopic surgery using box trainers: a randomized control study. , 2012, The Journal of surgical research.

[7]  R. M. Satava,et al.  Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[8]  J. Tihanyi,et al.  Kinematics of Running at Different Slopes and Speeds , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[9]  Makoto Hashizume,et al.  Construct validity for eye–hand coordination skill on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  H. Egi,et al.  Evaluating the correlation between the HUESAD and OSATS scores: Concurrent validity study , 2013, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[11]  J. Baillie,et al.  Assessment of innate ability and skills for endoscopic manipulations by the advanced Dundee endoscopic psychomotor tester: predictive and concurrent validity. , 2000, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  Litynski Gs,et al.  Profiles in laparoscopy: Mouret, Dubois, and Perissat: the laparoscopic breakthrough in Europe (1987-1988). , 1999 .

[13]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: Construct and concurrent validity , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[14]  Tomohiro Kawahara,et al.  Scientific assessment of endoscopic surgical skills , 2010, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[15]  Lucian Panait,et al.  The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. , 2009, The Journal of surgical research.

[16]  R. Reznick,et al.  Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[17]  Makoto Kaneko,et al.  Objective assessment of endoscopic surgical skills by analyzing direction-dependent dexterity using the Hiroshima University Endoscopic Surgical Assessment Device (HUESAD) , 2008, Surgery Today.

[18]  J. Torkington,et al.  Is motion analysis a valid tool for assessing laparoscopic skill? , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[19]  Aimin Zhang,et al.  Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor®) , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[20]  A. Darzi,et al.  Relationship between skill and outcome in the laboratory-based model. , 2002, Surgery.

[21]  T. Kawahara,et al.  Approaching time is important for assessment of endoscopic surgical skills , 2012, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[22]  Alfred Cuschieri,et al.  The performance of master surgeons on the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester: contrast validity study. , 2002, Archives of surgery.

[23]  A. Darzi,et al.  Measurement of Surgical Dexterity Using Motion Analysis of Simple Bench Tasks , 2003, World Journal of Surgery.

[24]  R. Reznick,et al.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[25]  D. Scott,et al.  Construct and face validity of MIST-VR, Endotower, and CELTS , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.