Convergence Analysis of Pseudo-Transient Continuation

Driven cavity ows by eecient numerical techniques, J. An error estimate for the modiied newton method with applications to the solution of nonlinear two-point boundary value problems, Accurate and economical solution of the pressure head form of Richards' equation by the method of lines, Tech. Application of Newton-Krylov methodology to a three-dimensional unstructured Euler code. and the conceptual framework of the theory, which was originally motivated by similar observations in the literature. There is a fairly long induction phase, in which the initial iterate is guided towards the Newton convergence domain by remaining close to the physical transient, with relatively small timesteps. There is a terminal phase which can be made as rapid as the capability of the linear solver permits (which varies from application to application), in which an iterate in the Newton convergence domain is polished. Connecting the two is a phase of moderate length during which the time step is built up towards the Newton limit of max , starting from a reasonably accurate iterate. The division between these phases is not always clear cut, though exogenous experience suggests that it becomes more so when the corrector of x 1 is iterated towards convergence on each time step. We plan to examine this region of parameter space in conjunction with an extension of the theory to mixed steady//tc systems (analogs of diierential-algebraic systems in the ODE context) in the future. update. Asymptotic convergence cannot be expected to be quadratic or superlinear, since we do not enforce n ! 0 in (3.5). However, linear convergence is steep, and our experience shows that overall execution time is increased if too many linear iterations are employed in order to enforce n ! 0 asymptotically. In the results shown in this section, the inner linear convergence tolerance was set at 10 ?2 for the defect correction part of the trajectory, and at 10 ?3 for the Newton part. The work was also limited to a maximum of 12 restart cycles of 20 Krylov vectors each. Examination of the pseudo-timestep history shows monotonic growth that is gradual through the defect correction phase (ending at n = 14), then more rapidly growing , and asymptotically at max (beginning at n = 20). Steps 21, 24, and 32 show momentary retreats from max in response to a reenement on the tc strategy that automatically cuts back the pseudo-timestep by a xed factor if a …

[1]  V. Shamanskii A modification of Newton's method , 1967 .

[2]  Paul Orkwis,et al.  A Newton's method solver for the Navier-Stokes equations , 1990 .

[3]  Alan C. Hindmarsh,et al.  Description and use of LSODE, the Livermore Solver for Ordinary Differential Equations , 1993 .

[4]  L. Petzold A description of dassl: a differential/algebraic system solver , 1982 .

[5]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Accurate and economical solution of the pressure-head form of Richards' equation by the method of lines , 1997 .

[6]  R. Dembo,et al.  INEXACT NEWTON METHODS , 1982 .

[7]  P. Brown,et al.  Matrix-free methods for stiff systems of ODE's , 1986 .

[8]  C. Kelley,et al.  Convergence Analysis of Pseudo-Transient Continuation , 1998 .

[9]  G. D. Byrne,et al.  VODE: a variable-coefficient ODE solver , 1989 .

[10]  Peter A. Forsyth,et al.  Robust linear and nonlinear strategies for solution of the transonic Euler equations , 1995 .

[11]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Hybrid Krylov Methods for Nonlinear Systems of Equations , 1990, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  H. Keller,et al.  Analysis of Numerical Methods , 1967 .

[13]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Experiments with implicit upwind methods for the Euler equations , 1985 .

[14]  V. Venkatakrishnan Newton solution of inviscid and viscous problems , 1988 .

[15]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations , 1983, Prentice Hall series in computational mathematics.

[16]  O. Nevanlinna Convergence of Iterations for Linear Equations , 1993 .

[17]  David E. Keyes,et al.  Towards Polyalgorithmic Linear System Solvers for Nonlinear Elliptic Problems , 1994, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[18]  M. Smooke,et al.  Error estimate for the modified Newton method with applications to the solution of nonlinear, two-point boundary-value problems , 1983 .

[19]  C. Kelley Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations , 1987 .

[20]  David E. Keyes,et al.  A parallelized elliptic solver for reacting flows , 1987 .

[21]  L. Shampine Implementation of Implicit Formulas for the Solution of ODEs , 1980 .

[22]  David E. Keyes,et al.  Aerodynamic applications of Newton- Krylov-Schwarz solvers , 1995 .

[23]  Linda R. Petzold,et al.  Using Krylov Methods in the Solution of Large-Scale Differential-Algebraic Systems , 1994, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[24]  J. M. Watt Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations , 1972 .

[25]  David E. Keyes,et al.  Application of Newton-Krylov methodology to a three-dimensional unstructured Euler code , 1995 .

[26]  D. Keyes,et al.  NEWTON-KRYLOV-SCHWARZ: AN IMPLICIT SOLVER FOR CFD , 1995 .