Rectification of the EMG signal impairs the identification of oscillatory input to the muscle.

Rectification of EMG signals is a common processing step used when performing electroencephalographic-electromyographic (EEG-EMG) coherence and EMG-EMG coherence. It is well known, however, that EMG rectification alters the power spectrum of the recorded EMG signal (interference EMG). The purpose of this study was to determine whether rectification of the EMG signal influences the capability of capturing the oscillatory input to a single EMG signal and the common oscillations between two EMG signals. Several EMG signals were reconstructed from experimentally recorded EMG signals from the surface of the first dorsal interosseus muscle and were manipulated to have an oscillatory input or common input (for pairs of reconstructed EMG signals) at various frequency bands (in Hz: 0-12, 12-30, 30-50, 50-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-250, 250-300, and 300-400), one at a time. The absolute integral and normalized integral of power, peak power, and peak coherence (for pairs of EMG signals) were quantified from each frequency band. The power spectrum of the interference EMG accurately detected the changes to the oscillatory input to the reconstructed EMG signal, whereas the power spectrum of the rectified EMG did not. Similarly, the EMG-EMG coherence between two interference EMG signals accurately detected the common input to the pairs of reconstructed EMG signals, whereas the EMG-EMG coherence between two rectified EMG signals did not. The frequency band from 12 to 30 Hz in the power spectrum of the rectified EMG and the EMG-EMG coherence between two rectified signals was influenced by the input from 100 to 150 Hz but not from the input from 12 to 30 Hz. The study concludes that the power spectrum of the EMG and EMG-EMG coherence should be performed on interference EMG signals and not on rectified EMG signals because rectification impairs the identification of the oscillatory input to a single EMG signal and the common oscillatory input between two EMG signals.

[1]  R. Hari,et al.  Synchronous cortical oscillatory activity during motor action , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Motor unit recruitment strategies investigated by surface EMG variables. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  M. Hallett,et al.  Electroencephalographic analysis of cortico-muscular coherence: reference effect, volume conduction and generator mechanism , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  J. R. Rosenberg,et al.  Using electroencephalography to study functional coupling between cortical activity and electromyograms during voluntary contractions in humans , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  J. R. Rosenberg,et al.  A review of recent applications of cross-correlation methodologies to human motor unit recording , 1997, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  T. Homma,et al.  Ramification pattern of intermetacarpal branches of the deep branch (ramus profundus) of the ulnar nerve in the human hand. , 1991, Acta anatomica.

[7]  J. Kilner,et al.  Coupling of oscillatory activity between muscles is strikingly reduced in a deafferented subject compared with normal controls. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Overview and critique of Chapters 20 and 21 , 1989 .

[9]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  R. Lemon,et al.  Human Cortical Muscle Coherence Is Directly Related to Specific Motor Parameters , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  P. Grosse,et al.  Coherence analysis in the myoclonus of corticobasal degeneration , 2003, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[12]  D. Farina,et al.  Surface Electromyography for Noninvasive Characterization of Muscle , 2001, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[13]  François G. Meyer,et al.  Coherence at 16-32 Hz can be caused by short-term synchrony of motor units. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  A M Amjad,et al.  A framework for the analysis of neuronal networks. , 1989, Progress in brain research.

[15]  Jing Z. Liu,et al.  Effects of surface EMG rectification on power and coherence analyses: An EEG and MEG study , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Neuronal Coherence as a Mechanism of Effective Corticospinal Interaction , 2005, Science.

[17]  Evangelos A. Christou,et al.  Discharge rate during low-force isometric contractions influences motor unit coherence below 15 Hz but not motor unit synchronization , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Evangelos A. Christou,et al.  Removal of visual feedback alters muscle activity and reduces force variability during constant isometric contractions , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Task‐dependent modulation of 15‐30 Hz coherence between rectified EMGs from human hand and forearm muscles , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Andrew J Lees,et al.  Patterns of EMG–EMG coherence in limb dystonia , 2004, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[22]  W. Singer,et al.  Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Hallett,et al.  Corticomuscular coherence: a review. , 1999, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[24]  Robert Turner,et al.  BOLD correlates of EMG spectral density in cortical myoclonus: Description of method and case report , 2006, NeuroImage.

[25]  A. Daffertshofer,et al.  Low-alcohol doses reduce common 10- to 15-Hz input to bilateral leg muscles during quiet standing. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  P. Griffin,et al.  Physical processes associated with the deactivation of dopants in laser annealed silicon , 2002 .

[27]  B. Hawkins,et al.  A framework: , 2020, Harmful Interaction between the Living and the Dead in Greek Tragedy.

[28]  B. Conway,et al.  Synchronization between motor cortex and spinal motoneuronal pool during the performance of a maintained motor task in man. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  Roger M Enoka,et al.  Multiple features of motor-unit activity influence force fluctuations during isometric contractions. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  C. Vaughan,et al.  Rectification and non-linear pre-processing of EMG signals for cortico-muscular analysis , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  John G Semmler,et al.  Motor Unit Synchronization and Neuromuscular Performance , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[32]  P. Grosse,et al.  Abnormal corticomuscular and intermuscular coupling in high-frequency rhythmic myoclonus. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Zeynep Erim,et al.  Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[34]  Edmund Y. S. Chao,et al.  Biomechanics of the hand : a basic research study , 1989 .

[35]  P. Brown,et al.  EEG–EMG, MEG–EMG and EMG–EMG frequency analysis: physiological principles and clinical applications , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  Zong-Ming Li,et al.  Multi-directional strength and force envelope of the index finger. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[37]  Madeleine M. Lowery,et al.  Coherence between motor unit discharges in response to shared neural inputs , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[38]  Zeynep Erim,et al.  Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Open Access Time and Frequency Domain Methods for Quantifying Common Modulation of Motor Unit Firing Patterns , 2004 .

[39]  P. Brown.  Cortical drives to human muscle: the Piper and related rhythms , 2000, Progress in Neurobiology.