Fabrication of nanoporous membranes for tuning microbial interactions and biochemical reactions.

New strategies for combining conventional photo- and soft-lithographic techniques with high-resolution patterning and etching strategies are needed in order to produce multiscale fluidic platforms that address the full range of functional scales seen in complex biological and chemical systems. The smallest resolution required for an application often dictates the fabrication method used. Micromachining and micropowder blasting yield higher throughput, but lack the resolution needed to fully address biological and chemical systems at the cellular and molecular scales. In contrast, techniques such as electron beam lithography or nanoimprinting allow nanoscale resolution, but are traditionally considered costly and slow. Other techniques such as photolithography or soft lithography have characteristics between these extremes. Combining these techniques to fabricate multiscale or hybrid fluidics allows fundamental biological and chemical questions to be answered. In this study, a combination of photolithography and electron beam lithography are used to produce two multiscale fluidic devices that incorporate porous membranes into complex fluidic networks in order to control the flow of energy, information, and materials in chemical form. In the first device, materials and energy were used to support chemical reactions. A nanoporous membrane fabricated with e-beam lithography separates two parallel, serpentine channels. Photolithography was used to pattern microfluidic channels around the membrane. The pores were written at 150 nm and reduced in size with silicon dioxide deposition from plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition and atomic layer deposition. Using this method, the molecular weight cutoff of the membrane can be adapted to the system of interest. In the second approach, photolithography was used to fabricate 200 nm thin pores. The pores confined microbes and allowed energy replenishment from a media perfusion channel. The same device can be used for study of intercellular communication via the secretion and uptake of signal molecules. Pore size was tested with 750 nm fluorescent polystyrene beads and fluorescein dye. The 200 nm polydimethylsiloxane pores were shown to be robust enough to hold 750 nm beads while under pressure, but allow fluorescein to diffuse across the barrier. Further testing showed that extended culture of bacteria within the chambers was possible. These two examples show how lithographically defined porous membranes can be adapted to two unique situations and used to tune the flow of chemical energy, materials, and information within a microfluidic network.

[1]  Ryoji Kurita,et al.  Miniaturized one-chip electrochemical sensing device integrated with a dialysis membrane and double thin-layer flow channels for measuring blood samples. , 2006, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[2]  S. Retterer,et al.  Molecular transport in a crowded volume created from vertically aligned carbon nanofibres: a fluorescence recovery after photobleaching study , 2006, Nanotechnology.

[3]  S. Retterer,et al.  Development and fabrication of nanoporous silicon-based bioreactors within a microfluidic chip. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[4]  S. Retterer,et al.  Nanostructured silicon membranes for control of molecular transport. , 2010, Journal of vacuum science and technology. B, Nanotechnology & microelectronics : materials, processing, measurement, & phenomena : JVST B.

[5]  Rajeev J Ram,et al.  Microfluidic chemostat and turbidostat with flow rate, oxygen, and temperature control for dynamic continuous culture. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[6]  N. Allbritton,et al.  Micro total analysis systems for cell biology and biochemical assays. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  R. Ismagilov,et al.  Individually addressable arrays of replica microbial cultures enabled by splitting SlipChips. , 2014, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[8]  R. Austin,et al.  Bacterial metapopulations in nanofabricated landscapes , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  S. Tay,et al.  Microfluidic cell culture. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[10]  S. Zhdanov,et al.  Pore design and engineering for filters and membranes , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  D. Hensley,et al.  Microarrays of Biomimetic Cells Formed by the Controlled Synthesis of Carbon Nanofiber Membranes , 2004 .

[12]  D. Hensley,et al.  Tailored transport through vertically aligned carbon nanofibre membranes; controlled synthesis, modelling, and passive diffusion experiments , 2005 .

[13]  Piro Siuti,et al.  Continuous protein production in nanoporous, picolitre volume containers. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[14]  M. Guillorn,et al.  Controlled transport of latex beads through vertically aligned carbon nanofiber membranes , 2002 .

[15]  N. Kaji,et al.  Self-assembled nanowire arrays as three-dimensional nanopores for filtration of DNA molecules. , 2015, Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry.

[16]  Andrew Wright,et al.  Robust Growth of Escherichia coli , 2010, Current Biology.

[17]  Robert H Austin,et al.  An introduction to micro-ecology patches. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[18]  R. Austin,et al.  Computation of mutual fitness by competing bacteria , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  P. Price,et al.  Novel Filter for Biological Materials , 1964, Science.

[20]  T. Gaborski,et al.  Charge- and size-based separation of macromolecules using ultrathin silicon membranes , 2007, Nature.

[21]  D. Branton,et al.  The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  J. Schultz,et al.  Hindered Diffusion in Microporous Membranes with Known Pore Geometry , 1970, Science.

[23]  M. Ferrari,et al.  Silicon membrane nanofilters from sacrificial oxide removal , 1999 .

[24]  D. J. Harrison,et al.  Self-assembled colloidal arrays as three-dimensional nanofluidic sieves for separation of biomolecules on microchips. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  S. Retterer,et al.  Enzyme reactions in nanoporous, picoliter volume containers. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  Robert H. Austin,et al.  Anomalous Spatial Redistribution of Competing Bacteria under Starvation Conditions , 2011, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Continuous perfusion microfluidic cell culture array for high-throughput cell-based assays. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[28]  H. Tong,et al.  Silicon nitride nanosieve membrane , 2004 .

[29]  S. Retterer,et al.  Positional control of catalyst nanoparticles for the synthesis of high density carbon nanofiber arrays. , 2008, Carbon.

[30]  K. Jensen,et al.  Cells on chips , 2006, Nature.

[31]  P. Apel,et al.  Track etching technique in membrane technology , 2001 .

[32]  Lori A. Lepak,et al.  Direct Casting of Polymer Membranes into Microfluidic Devices , 2004 .