An novel identification method of the environmental risk sources for surface water pollution accidents in chemical industrial parks.

The chemical industry is a major source of various pollution accidents. Improving the management level of risk sources for pollution accidents has become an urgent demand for most industrialized countries. In pollution accidents, the released chemicals harm the receptors to some extent depending on their sensitivity or susceptibility. Therefore, identifying the potential risk sources from such a large number of chemical enterprises has become pressingly urgent. Based on the simulation of the whole accident process, a novel and expandable identification method for risk sources causing water pollution accidents is presented. The newly developed approach, by analyzing and stimulating the whole process of a pollution accident between sources and receptors, can be applied to identify risk sources, especially on the nationwide scale. Three major types of losses, such as social, economic and ecological losses, were normalized, analyzed and used for overall consequence modeling. A specific case study area, located in a chemical industry park (CIP) along the Yangtze River in Jiangsu Province, China, was selected to test the potential of the identification method. The results showed that there were four risk sources for pollution accidents in this CIP. Aniline leakage in the HS Chemical Plant would lead to the most serious impact on the surrounding water environment. This potential accident would severely damage the ecosystem up to 3.8 km downstream of Yangtze River, and lead to pollution over a distance stretching to 73.7 km downstream. The proposed method is easily extended to the nationwide identification of potential risk sources.

[1]  Samuel C. Morris,et al.  Chemical emergencies: Evaluation of guidelines for risk identification, assessment, and management , 1987 .

[2]  Arthur P.J. Mol,et al.  Managing major chemical accidents in China: towards effective risk information. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[3]  Maureen Heraty Wood The Seveso II experience in the application of generic substance criteria to identify major hazard sites. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  Yang Zhifeng Aquatic ecological risk assessment and management strategies in a watershed:An overview , 2010 .

[5]  B. Zhang,et al.  Initial identification of heavy metals contamination in Taihu Lake, a eutrophic lake in China. , 2012, Journal of environmental sciences.

[6]  Weihua Zeng,et al.  Policy issues on the control of environmental accident hazards in China and their implementation , 2010 .

[7]  Paul N. Sharratt,et al.  A life-cycle framework to analyse business risk in process industry projects , 2002 .

[8]  Q Yu,et al.  Safety distance assessment of industrial toxic releases based on frequency and consequence: a case study in Shanghai, China. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  Zijian Wang,et al.  Prediction of the environmental fate and aquatic ecological impact of nitrobenzene in the Songhua River using the modified AQUATOX model. , 2008, Journal of environmental sciences.

[10]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Evaluating the environmental impact of products and production processes: a comparison of six methods , 1997 .

[11]  Lisa Schweitzer,et al.  Accident frequencies in environmental justice assessment and land use studies. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[12]  K. R. Zhao,et al.  A System for Identifying and Analyzing Environmental Accident Risk Sources , 2010 .

[13]  L. Jenkins,et al.  Determining the most informative scenarios of environmental impact from potential major accidents , 1999 .

[14]  J Maiti,et al.  A methodology for overall consequence modeling in chemical industry. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[15]  Mats Tysklind,et al.  A method to relate chemical accident properties and expert judgements in order to derive useful information for the development of Environment-Accident Index. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  J. G. Post,et al.  Environmental risk: towards an integrated assessment of industrial activities , 1998 .

[18]  Anique Hommels,et al.  The EU Seveso regime in practice: from uncertainty blindness to uncertainty tolerance. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  Liang Dong,et al.  Concentration and source identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and phthalic acid esters in the surface water of the Yangtze River Delta, China. , 2012, Journal of environmental sciences.

[20]  Jae-Woo Park,et al.  Determination of a risk management primer at petroleum-contaminated sites: developing new human health risk assessment strategy. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[21]  Yulin Hou,et al.  Evaluation of major polluting accidents in China--results and perspectives. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[22]  S. Giove,et al.  Regional risk assessment for contaminated sites part 1: vulnerability assessment by multicriteria decision analysis. , 2011, Environment international.

[23]  Tom Hoppe,et al.  Off-site toxic consequence assessment: a simplified modeling procedure and case study. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[24]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Regional risk assessment for contaminated sites part 2: ranking of potentially contaminated sites. , 2011, Environment international.

[25]  Jun Bi,et al.  A two-scale system to identify environmental risk of chemical industry clusters. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[26]  R. D. Jones,et al.  Extending the J-value framework for safety analysis to include the environmental costs of a large accident , 2010 .