What makes words sound similar?

Although similarity plays an important role in accounts of language processing, there are surprisingly few direct empirical studies of the phonological similarity between words, and it is therefore not clear whether similarity comparisons between words involve processes similar to those involved in other cognitive domains. In five experiments, participants chose which of two monosyllabic pseudo-words sounded more similar to a target pseudo-word. Our results are generally consistent with the structural alignment theory of comparisons between complex mental representations, suggesting that phonological word similarity parallels similarity involving other kinds of information including visual objects and scenes, events, and word meanings. We use our results to test new metrics of word similarity, and identify predictions for future similarity research both in the domain of word sounds and in other cognitive domains.

[1]  W. Marslen-Wilson Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[2]  J. Stemberger Apparent anti-frequency effects in language production: The Addition Bias and phonological underspecification☆ , 1991 .

[3]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Perception of Wordlikeness: Effects of Segment Probability and Length on the Processing of Nonwords. , 2000, Journal of memory and language.

[5]  H M Sussman,et al.  An investigation of stop place of articulation as a function of syllable position: a locus equation perspective. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  A. Cutler,et al.  Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon , 1977 .

[7]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[8]  Lynne G. Duncan,et al.  How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading? , 1997, Cognition.

[9]  D. G. MacKay The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech , 1972 .

[10]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. , 1997 .

[11]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The structure of spoken syllables: Evidence from novel word games , 1983, Cognition.

[12]  Robert L. Goldstone Similarity, interactive activation, and mapping , 1994 .

[13]  Robert L. Goldstone Feature distribution and biased estimation of visual displays. , 1993 .

[14]  J. Gandour,et al.  The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: Positions of shared phonemes , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[15]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[16]  Michael Kenstowicz,et al.  Phonology In Generative Grammar , 1994 .

[17]  P. Luce Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon , 1986 .

[18]  Dawn G. Blasko,et al.  Do the Beginnings of Spoken Words Have a Special Status in Auditory Word Recognition , 1993 .

[19]  Shane T. Mueller,et al.  Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity, and phonological complexity in verbal working memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  A. Markman,et al.  Structural alignment in similarity and difference judgments , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Rated acoustic (articulatory) similarity for word pairs varying in number and ordinal position of common letters , 1970 .

[22]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[23]  Stefan A. Frisch,et al.  Similarity and Frequency in Phonology , 1996 .

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  U. Hahn,et al.  German Inflection: Single Route or Dual Route? , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[27]  Louisa M. Slowiaczek,et al.  Effects of phonological similarity on priming in auditory lexical decision , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[28]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[29]  A. Ortony,et al.  Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1991 .

[30]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.

[31]  Angela Baumann,et al.  Nine-Month-Olds' Attention to Sound Similarities in Syllables☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[32]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Jamie L. Metsala,et al.  An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Alignment-based nonmonotonicities in similarity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Unfolding of phonetic information over time: a database of Dutch diphone perception. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  R. Treiman,et al.  The internal structure of word-initial consonant clusters☆ , 1986 .

[37]  J. Stemberger Wordshape errors in language production , 1990, Cognition.

[38]  Koen Lamberts,et al.  Categorization under time pressure. , 1995 .

[39]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense , 1982 .

[40]  H. Ellis,et al.  Cue Saliency in Faces as Assessed by the ‘Photofit’ Technique , 1977, Perception.

[41]  D. Gentner,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article STRUCTURAL ALIGNMENT IN COMPARISON: No Difference Without Similarity , 2022 .

[42]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  U. Hahn,et al.  Similarity and categorization , 2001 .

[44]  WALTER F. SENDLMEIER Auditive Judgements of Word Similarity , 1987 .

[45]  A. Tversky,et al.  Similarity, Separability, and the Triangle Inequality , 1982 .

[46]  José Benkí,et al.  Analysis of English Nonsense Syllable Recognition in Noise , 2003, Phonetica.

[47]  Koen Lamberts,et al.  The time course of categorization. , 1998 .

[48]  W Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. , 1994, Psychological review.

[49]  Mark T. Keane Constraints on Analogical Mapping: A Comparison of Three Models , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[50]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[51]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches , 1999 .

[52]  D. Gentner,et al.  Splitting the Differences: A Structural Alignment View of Similarity , 1993 .

[53]  W A Wickelgren,et al.  Distinctive features and errors in short-term memory for English vowels. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  José Benkí Quantitative evaluation of lexical status, word frequency, and neighborhood density as context effects in spoken word recognition. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  Todd M. Bailey,et al.  Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? , 2001 .

[56]  A D Baddeley,et al.  Short-term Memory for Word Sequences as a Function of Acoustic, Semantic and Formal Similarity , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[57]  W. A. Wickelgren,et al.  Distinctive features and errors in short-term memory for English consonants. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Studies in the Psychological Correlates of the Sound System of American English , 1964 .

[59]  R. Treiman,et al.  The Structure of English Syllables and Polysyllables , 1993 .

[60]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The Limited Use of Distinctive Features and Markedness in Speech Production: Evidence from Speech Error Data. , 1979 .

[61]  D. Gentner Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[62]  N D Haig,et al.  How Faces Differ—A New Comparative Technique , 1985, Perception.

[63]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[64]  T. Landauer,et al.  Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition , 1973 .

[65]  Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. , 1996 .

[66]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[67]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access , 2002, Cognition.

[68]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[69]  Erik Fudge,et al.  Branching structure within the syllable , 1987, Journal of Linguistics.

[70]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. , 1999 .

[71]  D. Gentner,et al.  Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[72]  Robert L. Goldstone The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork , 1994, Cognition.

[73]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Generalizations of regular and irregular morphology , 1993 .

[74]  G. Dell,et al.  The sequential cuing effect in speech production , 1994, Cognition.

[75]  P. Vitz,et al.  Predicting the judged “similarity of sound” of english words , 1973 .