A holistic approach to control process safety risks: Possible ways forward

Pursuing process safety in a world of continuously increasing requirements is not a simple matter. Keeping balance between producing quality and volume under budget constraints while maintaining an adequate safety level proves time and time again a difficult task given that evidently major accidents cannot be avoided. Lack of resilience from an organizational point of view to absorb unwanted and unforeseen disturbances has in recent years been put forward as a major cause, while organizational erosive drift is shown to be responsible for complacency and degradation of safety attitude. A systems approach to safety provides a new paradigm with the promise of new comprehensive tools. At the same time, one realizes that risk assessment will fall short of identifying and quantifying all possible scenarios. First, human error is in most assessments not included. It is even argued that determining human failure probability by decomposing it to basic elements of error is not possible. Second, the crux of the systemic approach is that safety is an emergent property, which means the same holds for the technological aspect: risk is not fully predictable from failure of components. By surveying and applying recent literature, besides analysing, this paper proposes a way forward by considering resilience of a socio-technical system both from an organizational and a technical side. The latter will for a large part be determined by the plant design. Sufficient redundancy and reserve shall be kept to preserve sufficient resilience, but the question that rises is how. Available methods are risk assessment and process simulation. It is helpful that the relation between risk and resilience analysis has been recently defined. Also, in a preliminary study the elements of resilience of a process have become listed. In the latter, receiving and interpreting weak signals to boost situational awareness plays an important role. To maintain alertness on the functioning of a safety management system, the process industry is monitoring safety performance indicators. The critical intensity level upon which management must be alarmed is less simple. Risk assessment may be improved, made dynamic, and be a tool of process control by taking account of short-term risk fluctuations based on sensor signals and the influence of human factors with its long-term changes via indicators. Bayesian network can provide the infrastructure. The paper will describe various complexities when applying a holistic control of safety to a process plant in general, and it will more specifically focus on safeguarding measures such as barriers and other controls with some examples.

[1]  Aarnout Brombacher MIR: Covering non-technical aspects of IEC61508 reliability certification. , 1999 .

[2]  Hans J. Pasman,et al.  Bayesian networks make LOPA more effective, QRA more transparent and flexible, and thus safety more definable! , 2013 .

[3]  E. Hollnagel The changing nature of risk , 2008 .

[4]  E. Hollnagel,et al.  The Changing Nature Of Risks , 2010 .

[5]  Hans J. Pasman,et al.  Safety of the process industries in the 21st century: A changing need of process safety management for a changing industry , 2009 .

[6]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety , 2012 .

[7]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part I: Quantitative model-based methods , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Robin Pitblado,et al.  Frequency data and modification factors used in QRA studies , 2011 .

[10]  Aarnout Brombacher,et al.  Maturity index on reliability: covering non-technical aspects of IEC61508 reliability certification. , 1999 .

[11]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty, second edition , 2007 .

[12]  D. M. Clarke Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty (2nd edn) Karl E Weick and Kathleen M Sutcliffe (2007) Wiley & Sons, San Francisco; ISBN 978-0-7879-9649-9; HC; 194 pages; USD 27.05 , 2008, Journal of Management & Organization.

[13]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Risk modelling of maintenance work on major process equipment on offshore petroleum installations , 2012 .

[14]  B. Knegtering Safety Lifecycle Management In Process Industries. , 1999 .

[15]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 2008 .

[16]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part III: Process history based methods , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[17]  B Bert Knegtering Safety lifecycle management in the process industries : the development of a qualitative safety related information analysis technique , 2002 .

[18]  Venkat Venkatasubramanian Systemic failures: challenges and opportunities in risk management in complex systems , 2011 .

[19]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Further development of a Causal model for Air Transport Safety (CATS): Building the mathematical heart , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  明哲 小松原,et al.  人的多重防護を巡って : Resilience Engineeringの観点から , 2007 .

[21]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Safety and Risk -Driven Design in Complex Systems -of - Systems , 2005 .

[22]  Cécile Fiévez,et al.  ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[23]  N. W. Hurst,et al.  A classification scheme for pipework failures to include human and sociotechnical errors and their contribution to pipework failure frequencies , 1991 .

[24]  Terje Aven,et al.  On how to define, understand and describe risk , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[25]  Andrew Hale,et al.  The development of an audit technique to assess the quality of safety barrier management. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[26]  Terje Aven,et al.  A risk perspective suitable for resilience engineering , 2011 .

[27]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  Resilience engineering of industrial processes: Principles and contributing factors , 2012 .