Forest/environment relationships in Yosemite National Park, California, USA

Forest compositional patterns in Yosemite National Park, California, were related to environmental factors through numerical classification of forest types, arrangement of forest types along elevational and topographic gradients, and development of regression models relating basal area of common tree species to environmental variables. The eight forest types are differentiated primarily by elevation zone and secondarily by topographic setting. Lower montane forests (1200–1900 m) were divided into the Abies concolor/Calocedrus type occurring primarily on mesic sites and the Pinus ponderosa/Calocedrus type predominantly on xeric sites. Upper montane forests (1900–2500 m) included the Abies concolor/Abies magnifica type on mesic sites, the Abies magnifica/Pinus type on somewhat more xeric sites, and Juniperus occidentalis/Pinus jeffreyi woodlands on granitic domes. Subalpine forests (2500–3300 m) embraced three types: Tsuga mertensiana/Pinus forests on mesic sites, monotypic Pinus contorta forests on drier sites, and Pinus albicaulis/Pinus contorta groves at treeline. Regression models consistently included elevation and soil magnesium content as explanatory variables of species basal area totals. The two Abies spp. were negatively correlated with soil magnesium levels, whereas other montane species (e.g. Calocedrus decurrens, Pinus lambertiana, and Pinus ponderosa) exhibited positive correlation with soil magnesium. Topography and soil physical properties were only infrequently incorporated into species regression models.

[1]  D. I. Axelrod.  Holocene Climatic Changes in Relation to Vegetation Disjunction and Speciation , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[2]  D. W. Goodall,et al.  Maximum-likelihood ordination — some improvements and further tests , 1987, Vegetatio.

[3]  M. O. Hill,et al.  TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program of arranging multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of individual and attributes , 1979 .

[4]  F. D. Klyver,et al.  Major Plant Communities in a Transect of the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California , 1931 .

[5]  O. Loucks,et al.  A Transformation for Species Response to Habitat Factors , 1972 .

[6]  F. Nachtergaele.  Soil taxonomy—a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys: Second edition, by Soil Survey Staff, 1999, USDA–NRCS, Agriculture Handbook number 436, Hardbound , 2001 .

[7]  M. Austin,et al.  Models for the analysis of species' response to environmental gradients , 2004, Vegetatio.

[8]  M. Austin,et al.  New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures , 1984, Vegetatio.

[9]  Peter R. Minchin,et al.  An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination , 1987, Vegetatio.

[10]  A. Parker.  Mixed Forests of Red Fir and White Fir in Yosemite National Park, California , 1984 .

[11]  R. Peet.  Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range , 1981, Vegetatio.

[12]  S. Weisberg.  Applied Linear Regression , 1981 .

[13]  L. G. Klikoff.  Microenvironmental Influence on Vegetational Pattern near Timberline in the Central Sierra Nevada , 1965 .

[14]  R. Yeaton.  Aspects of the Population Biology of Sugar Pine (Pinus lambertiana Dougl.) on an Elevational Gradient in the Sierra Nevada of Central California , 1984 .

[15]  A. J. Parker,et al.  Persistence of Lodgepole Pine Forests in the Central Sierra Nevada , 1986 .

[16]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  A Theory of Gradient Analysis , 2004 .

[17]  Susan L. Ustin,et al.  Relationships Between Sunfleck Dynamics and Red Fir Seedling Distribution , 1984 .

[18]  Ernest C. Frank,et al.  Potential solar beam irradiation on slopes , 1966 .

[19]  R. Yeaton.  SEEDLING CHARACTERISTICS AND ELEVATIONAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PINES (PINACEAE) IN THE SIERRA NEVADA OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: A HYPOTHESIS , 1981 .

[20]  R. Margalef,et al.  Information theory in ecology , 1958 .

[21]  P. Munz,et al.  Aliso : A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany , 2015 .

[22]  Duane F. Marble,et al.  Spatial analysis : a reader in statistical geography , 1969 .

[23]  C. Wahrhaftig,et al.  THE QUATERNARY OF THE PACIFIC MOUNTAIN SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA , 1965 .

[24]  F. H. Eyre,et al.  Forest cover types of the United States and Canada , 1980 .

[25]  G. Bouyoucos.  Hydrometer Method Improved for Making Particle Size Analyses of Soils1 , 1962 .

[26]  C. Braak,et al.  Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model , 2004, Vegetatio.

[27]  T. R. Wentworth.  Vegetation on Limestone and Granite in the Mule Mountains, Arizona , 1981 .

[28]  M. Hill,et al.  Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique , 1980 .

[29]  W. D. Billings,et al.  The Red Fir Forest of the Sierra Nevada: Abietum Magnificae , 1943 .

[30]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .