Functional preparedness of women of the first period of mature age of different somatotypes

Background and Study Aim. It is believed that the somatotype is a predictor of indicators of functional readiness. There are significant differences in the aerobic performance of the body for people of different somatotypes among students girls and men. Features of manifestation of anaerobic possibilities of an organism at persons of various somatotypes from 7 to 30 years old are described. We can assume that women of the first adulthood period of different somatotypes, indicators of functional readiness are manifested in different ways. The aim of the study was to identify the features of aerobic, anaerobic lactate and anaerobic alactate productivity of women of the first period of mature age of different somatotypes. Material and Methods. The study involved 210 females 25-35 years old. Somatotype was determined in all subjects. Functional readiness was determined by indicators of anaerobic lactatic productivity, anaerobic alactatic productivity and aerobic productivity of the organism. The power of aerobic energy supply processes was investigated by VO2max. To determine the VO2max used cycling ergometric version of the PWC 170 test. The subjects was performed a stepwise increasing load on the ergometer to determine the TAM. At the end of each stage, heart rate was recorded. The TAM level corresponded to the inflection point on the heart rate growth chart. The capacity of anaerobic lactate processes of energy supply was investigated by indicator of the maximum quantity of mechanical work for 1 minute (MQMK). The subjects performed a bicycle ergometric load duration 1 min with a power of 225 W with a maximum pedaling frequency. The power of anaerobic lactate processes of energy supply was determined by the Wingate anaerobic test WAnT 30. The power of anaerobic alactate processes of energy supply was determined by the test WAnT 10. Statistical processing was performed using the program STATISTICA 13. Results. According to absolute indicators (WAnT10. WAnT30. MQMK, TAM, VO2max) the advantage of representatives of endomorphic-mesomorphic somatotype was established. According to relative indicators of aerobic productivity (TAM, VO2max) representatives of the ectomorphic and balanced somatotype predominate. Conclusions. High values of absolute indicators of functional readiness are associated with high values ​​of body mass in combination with a high percentage of muscle for women of different somatotypes.  Accordingly, for representatives of somatotypes with lower body mass are characterized by lower absolute values ​​of all indicators of functional fitness. The relative indicators of aerobic productivity are dominated by representatives of somatotypes, which are characterized by lower body mass.

[1]  M. E. Kafkas,et al.  The effect of somatotype characters on selected physical performance parameters , 2019 .

[2]  S. Salnykova,et al.  The maximum oxygen consumption and body structure component of women at the first period of mature age with a different somatotypes , 2018, Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports.

[3]  V. Miroshnichenko,et al.  An estimation of aerobic and anaerobic productivity of an organism of youth aged 17-19 years old of Podilsk region , 2018, Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports.

[4]  Simon Jobson,et al.  The influence of somatotype on anaerobic performance , 2018, PloS one.

[5]  Regina Zimnitskaya,et al.  Comparative analysis of functional state and working capacity on veloergometer of average training level women of age 25–35 , 2017 .

[6]  J. Alkandari,et al.  Somatotype Components, Aerobic Fitness and Grip Strength in Kuwaiti Males and Females , 2016 .

[7]  S. Saha Somatic and Body Composition Factors Underlying Aerobic Capacity , 2015 .

[8]  P. Deshmukh,et al.  A Study of VO2 Max and Body Fat Percentage in Female Athletes. , 2014, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[9]  Kanae Oda,et al.  Relationship between peak oxygen uptake and regional body composition in Japanese subjects , 2014 .

[10]  S. Nikolić,et al.  Analysis of Body Mass Components in National Club Football Players in Republic of Macedonia , 2014, Medical archives.

[11]  G. Sporiš,et al.  Impact of body composition on performance in fitness tests among personnel of the Croatian navy. , 2011, Collegium antropologicum.

[12]  V. Son'kin,et al.  Development of the energetics of muscular exercise with age: Summary of a 30-Year study: IV. The development of the energetics of skeletal muscles depending on the somatotype , 2007, Human Physiology.

[13]  J. Wilmore,et al.  Physiology of Sport and Exercise , 1995 .

[14]  Stephen Lewis,et al.  Somatotyping—Development and Applications. , 1991 .

[15]  Oded Bar-Or,et al.  The Wingate Anaerobic Test An Update on Methodology, Reliability and Validity , 1987, Sports medicine.

[16]  L. Codecá,et al.  Determination of the anaerobic threshold by a noninvasive field test in runners. , 1982, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[17]  Dr. A. Szögÿ,et al.  Minutentest auf dem Fahrradergometer zur Bestimmung der anaeroben Kapazität , 1974, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[18]  M. Pityn,et al.  Enhancement of physical health in girls of 17-19 years by adoption of physical loads taking their somatotype into account , 2019 .

[19]  Irfan Marangoz,et al.  The Relationship among Somatotype Structures, Body Compositions and Estimated Oxygen Capacities of Elite Male Handball Players , 2018 .

[20]  M. MiroshnichenkoV. The maximum oxygen consumption and body structure component of women at the first period of mature age with a different somatotypes , 2018 .

[21]  Neha Parve,et al.  Study of Static Anthropometric Measurements and Body Somatotypes of Women , 2015 .