The Effect of Scoring Instructions and Degree of Speededness on the Validity and Reliability of Multiple-Choice Tests1

In a recent study, Traub, Hambleton, and Singh (1969) compared the effects of two scoring instructions-one promising a small reward for omitted questions, the other threatening a small penalty for wrong answers-on the performance of a multiple-choice vocabulary test. It was found that the reward instruction produced fewer incorrect answers, more omitted questions, and, with one qualification, higher reliability than the penalty instruction. The qualification was that the difference in reliability coefficients for the two instructions was significant at the .05 level when the performance

[1]  S. Sarason,et al.  Anxiety in elementary school children : a report of research , 1960 .

[2]  Ivan L. Russell Motivation for School Achievement: Measurement and Validation , 1969 .

[3]  I. Sarason Empirical findings and theoretical problems in the use of anxiety scales. , 1960, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Effects of Promised Reward and Threatened Penalty on Performance of a Multiple-Choice Vocabulary Test , 1969 .

[5]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  MANUAL FOR KIT OF REFERENCE TESTS FOR COGNITIVE FACTORS (REVISED 1963) , 1963 .

[6]  LeVerne S. Collet,et al.  The Effects of Differing Instructions and Guessing Formulas on Reliability and Validity , 1968 .

[7]  F. Swineford The measurement of a personality trait. , 1938 .

[8]  M. Slakter Generality of Risk Taking on Objective Examinations , 1969 .

[9]  M. Slakter THE EFFECT OF GUESSING STRATEGY ON OBJECTIVE TEST SCORES1 , 1968 .

[10]  Dale E. Mattson,et al.  The Effects of Guessing On the Standard Error of Measurement and the Reliability of Test Scores , 1965 .

[11]  Frederic M. Lord THE EFFECT OF RANDOM GUESSING ON TEST VALIDITY , 1964 .

[12]  G. M. Ruch,et al.  Corrections for chance and "Guess" vs. "Do not guess" instructions in multiple response tests. , 1926 .

[13]  D. S. Boomer,et al.  Who is penalized by the penalty for guessing , 1954 .

[14]  L. S. Feldt,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF THE CORRECTION FOR CHANCE SUCCESS ON THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN APTITUDE TEST , 1968 .