Effects of precision demands and mental pressure on muscle activation and hand forces in computer mouse tasks

The objective of the present study was to gain insight into the effects of precision demands and mental pressure on the load of the upper extremity. Two computer mouse tasks were used: an aiming and a tracking task. Upper extremity loading was operationalized as the myo-electric activity of the wrist flexor and extensor and of the trapezius descendens muscles and the applied grip- and click-forces on the computer mouse. Performance measures, reflecting the accuracy in both tasks and the clicking rate in the aiming task, indicated that the levels of the independent variables resulted in distinguishable levels of accuracy and work pace. Precision demands had a small effect on upper extremity loading with a significant increase in the EMG-amplitudes (21%) of the wrist flexors during the aiming tasks. Precision had large effects on performance. Mental pressure had substantial effects on EMG-amplitudes with an increase of 22% in the trapezius when tracking and increases of 41% in the trapezius and 45% and 140% in the wrist extensors and flexors, respectively, when aiming. During aiming, grip- and click-forces increased by 51% and 40% respectively. Mental pressure had small effects on accuracy but large effects on tempo during aiming. Precision demands and mental pressure in aiming and tracking tasks with a computer mouse were found to coincide with increased muscle activity in some upper extremity muscles and increased force exertion on the computer mouse. Mental pressure caused significant effects on these parameters more often than precision demands. Precision and mental pressure were found to have effects on performance, with precision effects being significant for all performance measures studied and mental pressure effects for some of them. The results of this study suggest that precision demands and mental pressure increase upper extremity load, with mental pressure effects being larger than precision effects. The possible role of precision demands as an indirect mental stressor in working conditions is discussed.

[1]  P. Buckle,et al.  The State of Scientific Knowledge Regarding Work Related Neck and Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders , 2000 .

[2]  G P Van Galen,et al.  Auditory stress effects on preparation and execution of graphical aiming: a test of the neuromotor noise concept. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[3]  G P Van Galen,et al.  Stress, neuromotor noise, and human performance: a theoretical perspective. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  R Kadefors,et al.  The effect of light manual precision work on shoulder muscles--an EMG analysis. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[5]  R. Westgaard,et al.  EMG activity and pain development in fibromyalgia patients exposed to mental stress of long duration. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[6]  Arend W A Van Gemmert,et al.  Forearm EMG response activity during motor performance in individuals prone to increased stress reactivity. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[7]  L Finsen,et al.  Job demands, muscle activity and musculoskeletal symptoms in relation to work with the computer mouse. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[8]  Hanne Gissel,et al.  Ca2+ accumulation and cell damage in skeletal muscle during low frequency stimulation , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[9]  Morten Wærsted,et al.  Human muscle activity related to non-biomechanical factors in the workplace , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[10]  Roland Kadefors,et al.  The role of muscle activity and mental load in the development of pain and degenerative processes at the muscle cell level during computer work , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[11]  G. Hägg.  Human muscle fibre abnormalities related to occupational load , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[12]  Nell,et al.  Musculoskeletal Symptoms among Computer-assisted Design (CAD) Operators and Evaluation of a Self-assessment Questionnaire. , 1996, International journal of occupational and environmental health.

[13]  C. Jensen,et al.  Musculoskeletal symptoms and duration of computer and mouse use , 2002 .

[14]  G. Sjøgaard,et al.  Effect of speed and precision demands on human shoulder muscle electromyography during a repetitive task , 1998, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[15]  M. Waersted,et al.  Human muscle activity related to non-biomechanical factors in the workplace. , 2000, European journal of applied physiology.

[16]  Ulf Lundberg,et al.  Psychophysiology of work: stress, gender, endocrine response, and work-related upper extremity disorders. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[17]  O. Axelson,et al.  Case-control study of risk factors for disease in the neck and shoulder area. , 1994, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[18]  B. Visser,et al.  The effect of arm and wrist supports on the load of the upper extremity during VDU work. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[19]  J. Sluiter,et al.  European Criteria Document for Evaluation of the Work-Relatedness of Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders , 2000 .

[20]  P. Buckle,et al.  The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  R. H. Westgaard,et al.  Effects of psychological demand and stress on neuromuscular function , 1996 .

[22]  T. Armstrong,et al.  A conceptual model for work-related neck and upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[23]  L Finsen,et al.  Acute response to precision, time pressure and mental demand during simulated computer work. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[24]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Fitts' law as the outcome of a dynamic noise filtering model of motor control , 1995 .

[25]  H. Hermens,et al.  European recommendations for surface electromyography: Results of the SENIAM Project , 1999 .

[26]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Coactivation to reduce variability in the elderly. , 1998, Motor control.

[27]  M. Hepp-Reymond,et al.  EMG activation patterns during force production in precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  K. Akazawa,et al.  Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  B. Laursen,et al.  Shoulder muscle activity in young and older people during a computer mouse task. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[30]  Denis Mottet,et al.  The dynamics of goal-directed rhythmical aiming , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[31]  B. Bernard,et al.  Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back , 1997 .

[32]  F. P. Kendall,et al.  Muscles, testing and function , 1971 .

[33]  P M Bongers,et al.  Psychosocial risk factors for neck pain: a systematic review. , 2001, American journal of industrial medicine.

[34]  E. Milerad,et al.  Effects of precision and force demands, grip diameter, and arm support during manual work: an electromyographic study. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[35]  M Fogleman,et al.  Computer mouse use and cumulative trauma disorders of the upper extremities. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[36]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  What behavioral benefit does stiffness control have? An elaboration of Smith's proposal , 1996 .

[37]  B. Jonsson.  Kinesiology: with special reference to electromyographic kinesiology. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[38]  D. Rempel,et al.  Influence of time pressure and verbal provocation on physiological and psychological reactions during work with a computer mouse , 2002, European Journal of Applied Physiology.