Ranking Academic Advisors: Analyzing Scientific Advising Impact Using MathGenealogy Social Network

Advising and mentoring Ph.D. students is an increasingly important aspect of the academic profession. We define and interpret a family of metrics (collectively referred to as “a-indices”) that can be applied to “ranking academic advisors” using the academic genealogical records of scientists, with the emphasis on taking into account not only the number of students advised by an individual, but also subsequent academic advising records of those students. We also define and calculate the extensions of the proposed indices that account for student co-advising (referred to as “adjusted a-indices”). Finally, we extend the proposed metrics to ranking universities and countries with respect to their “collective” advising impacts. To illustrate the proposed metrics, we consider the social network of over 200,000 mathematicians (as of July 2018) constructed using the Mathematics Genealogy Project data: the network nodes represent the mathematicians who have completed Ph.D. degrees, and the directed edges connect advisors with their students.

[1]  V. Latora,et al.  Harmony in the Small-World , 2000, cond-mat/0008357.

[2]  Murat Yuksel,et al.  Analysis of academic ties: A case study of Mathematics Genealogy , 2011, 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[3]  Floriana Gargiulo,et al.  The classical origin of modern mathematics , 2016, EPJ Data Science.

[4]  Sebastiano Vigna,et al.  Axioms for Centrality , 2013, Internet Math..

[5]  Peter J Mucha,et al.  Mathematical genealogy and department prestige. , 2011, Chaos.

[6]  Nikolas Tsakas On Decay Centrality , 2016, ArXiv.

[7]  Jesús P. Mena-Chalco,et al.  Genealogical index: A metric to analyze advisor-advisee relationships , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[8]  L. Amaral,et al.  The role of mentorship in protégé performance , 2010, Nature.

[9]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Eigenvector-Based Centrality Measures for Temporal Networks , 2015, Multiscale Model. Simul..