CANOPY TREE–SOIL INTERACTIONS WITHIN TEMPERATE FORESTS: SPECIES EFFECTS ON pH AND CATIONS

We quantified soil acidity and exchangeable cations in the forest floor and upper 7.5 cm of mineral soil beneath the canopies of individual trees of six different species in a mixed-species forest in northwestern Connecticut. Soil pH decreased in a sequence starting with sugar maple (Acer saccharum) . white ash (Fraxinus americana) . red maple (Acer rubrum) . beech (Fagus grandifolia) . red oak (Quercus rubra) . eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis). The differences among species were largest in the forest floor and the top 7.5 cm of mineral soil. Exchangeable Ca and Mg in the 0-7.5 cm mineral soil layer were significantly higher beneath sugar maple than all other species, with the exception of white ash. There were negligible differences among species in the quantity of exchangeable Ca and Mg in the forest floor. In the 0-7.5 cm mineral soil layer, exchangeable Ca was positively correlated with the content of unweathered Ca in the parent material, but the relationship differed among species. There was a large increase in exchangeable Ca in the soils beneath sugar maple but a negligible increase in the soils beneath hemlock and red maple. Exchangeable Al and Fe were highest beneath hemlock and lowest beneath sugar maple. The differences in pH and exchangeable cations between sugar maple and hemlock are likely due to interspecific differences in the introduction of acidity (e.g., organic acids) and Ca uptake and allocation. Observing an association between tree species and specific soil chemical properties within mixed-species stands implies that changes in the distribution and abundance of tree species alters the spatial and temporal pattern of soil acidity and cation cycling in this forest.

[1]  R. W. Taylor,et al.  Exchangeable cations and CEC determinations of some highly weathered soils , 1989 .

[2]  A. J. Friedland,et al.  Acid rain and soils of the Adirondacks. III. Rates of soil acidification in a montane spruce–fir forest at Whiteface Mountain, New York , 1994 .

[3]  J. Ovington.  Studies of the Development of Woodland Conditions Under Different Trees: I. Soils pH , 1953 .

[4]  M. R. Carter,et al.  Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis , 1993 .

[5]  G. Likens,et al.  Decrease in precipitation acidity resulting from decreased SO2−4 concentration , 1987, Nature.

[6]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests : interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees , 1994 .

[7]  T. A. Horner.  Control of Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Using Soil Injections of Systemic Insecticides , 1994, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[8]  Lawrence K. Forcier.  Reproductive Strategies and the Co-occurrence of Climax Tree Species , 1975, Science.

[9]  John A. Silander,et al.  Juvenile Tree Survivorship as a Component of Shade Tolerance , 1995 .

[10]  D. E. Hill,et al.  Soils of Connecticut. , 1980 .

[11]  D. Binkley.  The influence of tree species on forest soils: processes and patterns , 1995 .

[12]  John F. Muratore,et al.  Nitrogen and Lignin Control of Hardwood Leaf Litter Decomposition Dynamics , 1982 .

[13]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[14]  R. Graham,et al.  Transformations of 2:1 phyllosilicates in 41-year-old soils under oak and pine , 1996 .

[15]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  CANOPY TREE–SOIL INTERACTIONS WITHIN TEMPERATE FORESTS: SPECIES EFFECTS ON SOIL CARBON AND NITROGEN , 1998 .

[16]  Lee E. Frelich,et al.  Patch Formation and Maintenance in an Old‐Growth Hemlock‐Hardwood Forest , 1993 .

[17]  M. Molloy,et al.  Soil analysis as effected by drying temperatures , 1979 .

[18]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Steep declines in atmospheric base cations in regions of Europe and North America , 1994, Nature.

[19]  John A. Silander,et al.  Sapling growth as a function of resources in a north temperate forest , 1994 .

[20]  R. Boerner,et al.  Stemflow induced soil nutrient heterogeneity in a mixed mesophytic forest , 1986 .

[21]  M. Kononova.  Soil Organic Matter: Its Nature, Its Role in Soil Formation and in Soil Fertility , 2013 .

[22]  John Pastor,et al.  Aboveground Production and N and P Cycling Along a Nitrogen Mineralization Gradient on Blackhawk Island, Wisconsin , 1984 .

[23]  David H. Alban,et al.  Effects of Nutrient Accumulation by Aspen, Spruce, and Pine on Soil Properties , 1982 .

[24]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Base cation fertilization and liming effects on nutrition and growth of Vermont sugar maple stands , 1996 .

[25]  Helga Van Miegroet,et al.  The Impact of Nitrification on Soil Acidification and Cation Leaching in a Red Alder Ecosystem , 1984 .

[26]  Stephenie P. Joyner.  SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition , 1985 .

[27]  D. Houston.  Temporal and spatial shift within the Nectria pathogen complex associated with beech bark disease of Fagus grandifolia , 1994 .

[28]  C. White.  The role of monoterpenes in soil nitrogen cycling processes in ponderosa pine , 1991 .

[29]  P. Zinke,et al.  The Pattern of Influence of Individual Forest Trees on Soil Properties , 1962 .

[30]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Acid Rain: Response and Recovery of a Forest Ecosystem , 1996, Science.

[31]  I. Novozamsky,et al.  Aspects of pre-treatment of soils for inorganic chemical analysis. , 1994 .

[32]  Timothy R. Wilmot,et al.  Relationships among crown condition, growth, and stand nutrition in seven northern Vermont sugarbushes , 1995 .

[33]  C. Canham,et al.  Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: effects of soil elemental composition and texture on species distributions , 1997 .