Human shields mediate sexual conflict in a top predator

Selecting the right habitat in a risky landscape is crucial for an individual's survival and reproduction. In predator–prey systems, prey often can anticipate the habitat use of their main predator and may use protective associates (i.e. typically an apex predator) as shields against predation. Although never tested, such mechanisms should also evolve in systems in which sexual conflict affects offspring survival. Here, we assessed the relationship between offspring survival and habitat selection, as well as the use of protective associates, in a system in which sexually selected infanticide (SSI), rather than interspecific predation, affects offspring survival. We used the Scandinavian brown bear (Ursus arctos) population with SSI in a human-dominated landscape as our model system. Bears, especially adult males, generally avoid humans in our study system. We used resource selection functions to contrast habitat selection of GPS-collared mothers that were successful (i.e. surviving litters, n = 19) and unsuccessful (i.e. complete litter loss, n = 11) in keeping their young during the mating season (2005–2012). Habitat selection was indeed a predictor of litter survival. Successful mothers were more likely to use humans as protective associates, whereas unsuccessful mothers avoided humans. Our results suggest that principles of predator–prey and fear ecology theory (e.g. non-consumptive and cascading effects) can also be applied to the context of sexual conflict.

[1]  A. Zedrosser,et al.  Resource selection by sympatric free-ranging dairy cattle and brown bears Ursus arctos , 2011 .

[2]  Aaron Christ,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[3]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Promiscuous females protect their offspring. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  A. Zedrosser,et al.  Litter loss triggers estrus in a nonsocial seasonal breeder , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[5]  M. Boyce,et al.  Evaluating resource selection functions , 2002 .

[6]  J. Swenson.  INTRASPECIFIC PREDATION IN SCANDINAVIAN BROWN BEARS OLDER THAN CUBS-OF-THE-YEAR , 2002 .

[7]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[8]  C. Reusch,et al.  Infanticide as a male reproductive strategy has a nutritive risk effect in brown bears , 2013, Biology Letters.

[9]  F. Bunnell,et al.  Tests of hypotheses for sexual segregation in grizzly bears , 1995 .

[10]  K. Rode,et al.  Sexual dimorphism, reproductive strategy, and human activities determine resource use by brown bears. , 2006, Ecology.

[11]  K. Jerina,et al.  Does despotic behavior or food search explain the occurrence of problem brown bears in Europe? , 2014, The Journal of wildlife management.

[12]  A. Houston,et al.  General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation , 1993 .

[13]  H. Possingham,et al.  Active Adaptive Management for Conservation , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[15]  S. Forbes.  Infanticide by males and its implications , 2002 .

[16]  A. Zedrosser,et al.  Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[17]  J. Swenson,et al.  Terrain use by an expanding brown bear population in relation to age, recreational resorts and human settlements , 2007 .

[18]  G. Hausfater.  Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives , 1984, Current Anthropology.

[19]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Selection, use, choice and occupancy: clarifying concepts in resource selection studies. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[20]  Christopher N. Johnson,et al.  Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[21]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Human selection of elk behavioural traits in a landscape of fear , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  H. Ylönen,et al.  Counter-Strategies to Infanticide in Mammals: Costs and Consequences , 1998 .

[23]  J. Lawesson,et al.  National Atlas of Norway: Vegetation , 2000 .

[24]  M. Leclerc,et al.  Ecological implications from spatial patterns in human-caused brown bear mortality , 2016, Wildlife Biology.

[25]  Andrew D Higginson,et al.  Optimal foraging for multiple nutrients in an unpredictable environment. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[26]  S. Hrdy,et al.  Infanticide among animals: A review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females , 1979 .

[27]  N. Selva,et al.  Spatial patterns in brown bear Ursus arctos diet: the role of geographical and environmental factors , 2012 .

[28]  C. Schaik,et al.  Infanticide by males and its implications: The behavioral ecology of infanticide by males , 2000 .

[29]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[31]  Owen Nevin,et al.  Perceived risk, displacement and refuging in brown bears:positive impacts of ecotourism? , 2005 .

[32]  Bram Van Moorter,et al.  Moose Alces alces habitat use at multiple temporal scales in a human-altered landscape , 2011 .

[33]  S. Creel,et al.  Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[35]  M. Delibes,et al.  Predators or prey? Spatio-temporal discrimination of human-derived risk by brown bears , 2011, Oecologia.

[36]  B. Grenfell,et al.  Host densities as determinants of abundance in parasite communities , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  A. Zedrosser,et al.  Ultimate and proximate mechanisms underlying the occurrence of bears close to human settlements: review and management implications , 2014 .

[38]  Henrik Andrén,et al.  Biomedical Protocols for Free-ranging Brown Bears, Gray Wolves, Wolverines and Lynx Editors , 2007 .

[39]  A. Zedrosser,et al.  The relative importance of direct and indirect effects of hunting mortality on the population dynamics of brown bears , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  C. Packer,et al.  Adaptations of Female Lions to Infanticide by Incoming Males , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[41]  A. Zedrosser,et al.  Brown bear conservation and the ghost of persecution past , 2011 .

[42]  A Sih,et al.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  G. Polis,et al.  THE ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF INTRAGUILD PREDATION: Potential Competitors That Eat Each Other , 1989 .

[44]  L. Waits,et al.  The dilemma of female mate selection in the brown bear, a species with sexually selected infanticide , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  Behavioural strategies towards human disturbances explain individual performance in woodland caribou , 2014, Oecologia.

[46]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[47]  J. Swenson,et al.  Behaviour of Solitary Adult Scandinavian Brown Bears (Ursus arctos) when Approached by Humans on Foot , 2012, PloS one.

[48]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Individual Heterogeneity in Use of Human Shields by Mountain Nyala , 2014 .

[49]  A. Zuur,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[50]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Leave before it's too late: anthropogenic and environmental triggers of autumn migration in a hunted ungulate population. , 2016, Ecology.

[51]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  Adaptation and habitat selection in the eco-evolutionary process , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Do Scandinavian brown bears approach settlements to obtain high-quality food? , 2014 .

[53]  D. Allainé,et al.  Coping with human disturbance: spatial and temporal tactics of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) , 2010 .

[54]  J. Berger.  Fear, human shields and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas , 2007, Biology Letters.

[55]  K. Titus,et al.  Consumption of salmon by Alaskan brown bears: a trade-off between nutritional requirements and the risk of infanticide? , 2004, Oecologia.

[56]  J. Swenson,et al.  Infanticide caused by hunting of male bears , 1997, Nature.

[57]  A. Mysterud,et al.  An adaptive behavioural response to hunting: surviving male red deer shift habitat at the onset of the hunting season , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  S. Frank,et al.  A “clearcut” case? Brown bear selection of coarse woody debris and carpenter ants on clearcuts , 2015, Forest ecology and management.

[59]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[60]  M. Ueta,et al.  Protective nesting associations in birds , 2008 .

[61]  A. Zedrosser,et al.  The mating system of the brown bear Ursus arctos , 2012 .

[62]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Estimating Population Size of Elusive Animals with DNA from Hunter‐Collected Feces: Four Methods for Brown Bears , 2005 .

[63]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  The Ecology of Fear: Optimal Foraging, Game Theory, and Trophic Interactions , 1999 .

[64]  Lee A. Vierling,et al.  Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error , 2007 .