Neural correlates of context‐dependent feature conjunction learning in visual search tasks

Many perceptual learning experiments show that repeated exposure to a basic visual feature such as a specific orientation or spatial frequency can modify perception of that feature, and that those perceptual changes are associated with changes in neural tuning early in visual processing. Such perceptual learning effects thus exert a bottom‐up influence on subsequent stimulus processing, independent of task‐demands or endogenous influences (e.g., volitional attention). However, it is unclear whether such bottom‐up changes in perception can occur as more complex stimuli such as conjunctions of visual features are learned. It is not known whether changes in the efficiency with which people learn to process feature conjunctions in a task (e.g., visual search) reflect true bottom‐up perceptual learning versus top‐down, task‐related learning (e.g., learning better control of endogenous attention). Here we show that feature conjunction learning in visual search leads to bottom‐up changes in stimulus processing. First, using fMRI, we demonstrate that conjunction learning in visual search has a distinct neural signature: an increase in target‐evoked activity relative to distractor‐evoked activity (i.e., a relative increase in target salience). Second, we demonstrate that after learning, this neural signature is still evident even when participants passively view learned stimuli while performing an unrelated, attention‐demanding task. This suggests that conjunction learning results in altered bottom‐up perceptual processing of the learned conjunction stimuli (i.e., a perceptual change independent of the task). We further show that the acquired change in target‐evoked activity is contextually dependent on the presence of distractors, suggesting that search array Gestalts are learned. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2319–2330, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Mark W Greenlee,et al.  Pretraining Cortical Thickness Predicts Subsequent Perceptual Learning Rate in a Visual Search Task. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Eric A. Reavis,et al.  Caudate nucleus reactivity predicts perceptual learning rate for visual feature conjunctions , 2015, NeuroImage.

[3]  Matthew J. Crossley,et al.  Context-dependent savings in procedural category learning , 2014, Brain and Cognition.

[4]  Eric A. Reavis,et al.  Neural mechanisms of feature conjunction learning: Enduring changes in occipital cortex after a week of training , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[5]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Methods of Modeling Capacity in Simple Processing Systems , 2014 .

[6]  José E. Náñez,et al.  Decoding Reveals Plasticity in V3A as a Result of Motion Perceptual Learning , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  R. Johansson,et al.  Experience Can Change Distinct Size-Weight Priors Engaged in Lifting Objects and Judging their Weights , 2008, Current Biology.

[8]  Yuka Sasaki,et al.  Different Dynamics of Performance and Brain Activation in the Time Course of Perceptual Learning , 2008, Neuron.

[9]  B. Bahrami,et al.  Attentional Load Modulates Responses of Human Primary Visual Cortex to Invisible Stimuli , 2007, Current Biology.

[10]  C. Furmanski,et al.  Learning Strengthens the Response of Primary Visual Cortex to Simple Patterns , 2004, Current Biology.

[11]  Robert O. Duncan,et al.  Cortical Magnification within Human Primary Visual Cortex Correlates with Acuity Thresholds , 2003, Neuron.

[12]  P. Maquet,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual learning: A functional MRI study of visual texture discrimination , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  G. Orban,et al.  Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons , 2001, Nature.

[14]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Learning to find a shape , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[16]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[17]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[18]  A. Dale,et al.  The Retinotopy of Visual Spatial Attention , 1998, Neuron.

[19]  J. Hildebrand,et al.  Multitasking in the Olfactory System: Context-Dependent Responses to Odors Reveal Dual GABA-Regulated Coding Mechanisms in Single Olfactory Projection Neurons , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual learning of spatial localization: specificity for orientation, position, and context. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Ruxandra Sireteanu,et al.  Perceptual learning in visual search: Fast, enduring, but non-specific , 1995, Vision Research.

[22]  M. Bouton Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Representation and selection of relative position. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  H. Pashler,et al.  Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination , 1987, Vision Research.

[27]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  Zvisinei Sandi,et al.  Definition , 1960, A Philosopher Looks at Sport.

[29]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Advances in visual perceptual learning and plasticity , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  M Carrasco,et al.  “Transient structures”: The effects of practice and distractor grouping on within-dimension conjunction searches , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[32]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.