An ecological alternative to a "sad response": public language use transcends the boundaries of the skin.

Embedding theories of language production and comprehension in theories of action-perception is realistic and highlights that production and comprehension processes are interleaved. However, layers of internal models that repeatedly predict future linguistic actions and perceptions are implausible. I sketch an ecological alternative whereby perceiver/actors are modeled as dynamical systems coupled to one another and to the environment.

[1]  G. Dell Cascading and feedback in interactive models of production: A reflection of forward modeling? , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  Navin Viswanathan,et al.  Sentence comprehension affects the dynamics of bimanual coordination: Implications for embodied cognition , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Social Connection Through Joint Action and Interpersonal Coordination , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. , 2007, Human movement science.

[5]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on language–vision interactions , 2007 .

[6]  W. H. Warren The dynamics of perception and action. , 2006, Psychological review.

[7]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Contrasting Approaches to Perceiving and Acting With Others , 2006 .

[8]  M. Pickering,et al.  Why is conversation so easy? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  C. Fowler,et al.  Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[10]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  The optics and actions of catching fly balls , 1992 .

[11]  A. Bentley,et al.  The Human Skin: Philosophy's Last Line of Defense , 1941, Philosophy of Science.

[12]  C. Michaels,et al.  To Cross or Not to Cross: The Effect of Locomotion on Street-Crossing Behavior , 1996 .