Computing derivative information of sequentially coupled subsurface models

A generic framework for the computation of derivative information required for gradient-based optimization using sequentially coupled subsurface simulation models is presented. The proposed approach allows for the computation of any derivative information with no modification of the mathematical framework. It only requires the forward model Jacobians and the objective function to be appropriately defined. The flexibility of the framework is demonstrated by its application in different reservoir management studies. The performance of the gradient computation strategy is demonstrated in a synthetic water-flooding model, where the forward model is constructed based on a sequentially coupled flow-transport system. The methodology is illustrated for a synthetic model, with different types of applications of data assimilation and life-cycle optimization. Results are compared with the classical fully coupled (FIM) forward simulation. Based on the presented numerical examples, it is demonstrated how, without any modifications of the basic framework, the solution of gradient-based optimization models can be obtained for any given set of coupled equations. The sequential derivative computation methods deliver similar results compared to FIM methods, while being computationally more efficient.

[1]  David Lumley,et al.  Estimation of Reservoir Pressure And Saturations By Crossplot Inversion of 4D Seismic Attributes , 2003 .

[2]  G. Chavent,et al.  History Matching by Use of Optimal Theory , 1975 .

[3]  Jan Dirk Jansen,et al.  A simple algorithm to generate small geostatistical ensembles for subsurface flow simulation , 2013 .

[4]  Thomas Y. Hou,et al.  A Multiscale Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems in Composite Materials and Porous Media , 1997 .

[5]  S. Aanonsen,et al.  History Matching Using Time-lapse Seismic (HUTS) , 2003 .

[6]  Hadi Hajibeygi,et al.  Algebraic dynamic multilevel (ADM) method for fully implicit simulations of multiphase flow in porous media , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[7]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  History Matching of Three-Phase Flow Production Data , 2003 .

[8]  Jan Dirk Jansen,et al.  Gradient-based optimization of flow through porous media : Version 3 , 2016 .

[9]  D. W. Peaceman Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation with nonsquare grid blocks and anisotropic permeability , 1983 .

[10]  Wen H. Chen,et al.  Adaptation of the CPR Preconditioner for Efficient Solution of the Adjoint Equation , 2013 .

[11]  Peter A. Forsyth,et al.  Practical considerations for adaptive implicit methods in reservoir simulation , 1986 .

[12]  Ning Liu,et al.  Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching , 2008 .

[13]  P.J.P. Egberts,et al.  Optimal waterflood design using the adjoint method , 2007 .

[14]  Linda R. Petzold,et al.  Efficient Computation of Sensitivities for Ordinary Differential Equation Boundary Value Problems , 2002, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[15]  Colin MacBeth,et al.  Going quantitative with 4D seismic analysis , 2006 .

[16]  Patrick Jenny,et al.  Adaptive iterative multiscale finite volume method , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[17]  Jan Dirk Jansen,et al.  Adjoint-based optimization of multi-phase flow through porous media – A review , 2011 .

[18]  Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.  Development and application of reduced‐order modeling procedures for subsurface flow simulation , 2009 .

[19]  J. Jansen,et al.  Reduced-order optimal control of water flooding using proper orthogonal decomposition , 2006 .

[20]  Patrick Jenny,et al.  Adaptive Multiscale Finite-Volume Method for Multiphase Flow and Transport in Porous Media , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[21]  D. H. Thurnau,et al.  Reservoir Simulation Using an Adaptive Implicit Method , 1983 .

[22]  Hadi Hajibeygi,et al.  Multiscale gradient computation for flow in heterogeneous porous media , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..

[23]  Olwijn Leeuwenburgh,et al.  Quantification of the impact of ensemble size on the quality of an ensemble gradient using principles of hypothesis testing , 2015, ANSS 2015.

[24]  Jose Rodrigues,et al.  History Matching 4D Seismic Data with Efficient Gradient Based Methods , 2007 .

[25]  Stein Krogstad,et al.  Adjoint Multiscale Mixed Finite Elements , 2011 .

[26]  Jose Rodrigues,et al.  Calculating derivatives for automatic history matching , 2006 .

[27]  Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.  Implementation of Adjoint Solution for Optimal Control of Smart Wells , 2005 .

[28]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2018, Fundamental Statistical Inference.

[29]  Yalchin Efendiev,et al.  Hybrid upwind discretization of nonlinear two-phase flow with gravity , 2015 .

[30]  F. Anterion,et al.  Use of Parameter Gradients for Reservoir History Matching , 1989 .

[31]  Stefan Ulbrich,et al.  Adjoint-based derivative computations for the optimal control of discontinuous solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws , 2003, Syst. Control. Lett..

[32]  K. Aziz,et al.  Petroleum Reservoir Simulation , 1979 .

[33]  R. P. Kendall,et al.  Constrained Residual Acceleration of Conjugate Residual Methods , 1985 .

[34]  Olav Møyner,et al.  A multiscale restriction-smoothed basis method for high contrast porous media represented on unstructured grids , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[35]  Keith H. Coats,et al.  IMPES Stability: Selection of Stable Timesteps , 2003 .