organizational syntax. New production insights on the nature of the rm

The paper aims at providing the conceptual building blocks of a theory of the rm which addresses its \ontological questions" (existence, boundaries and organization) by placing production at its core. We draw on engineering for a more accurate description of the production process itself, highlighting its inner complexity and potentially chaotic nature, and on computational linguistics for a production{based account of the nature of economic agents and of the mechanisms through which they build ordered production sets. In so doing, we give a \more appropriate" production basis to the crucial issues of how rm’s boundaries are set, how its organisational structure is dened, and how it changes over time. In particular, we show how economic agents select some tasks to be performed internally, while leaving some other to external suppliers, on the basis of criteria based on both the dierent degrees of

[1]  R. Langlois,et al.  Capabilities and Governance: The Rebirth of Production in the Theory of Economic Organization , 1997 .

[2]  M. Boisot,et al.  Data, information and knowledge: have we got it right? , 2004 .

[3]  S. Winter Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[4]  Ignazio Licata Logical openness in cognitive models , 2008 .

[5]  Jason Potts,et al.  The New Evolutionary Microeconomics: Complexity, Competence and Adaptive Behaviour , 2001 .

[6]  P. Todd,et al.  Bounding rationality to the world , 2003 .

[7]  Barry Stewart,et al.  Modular Product Family Development Within a SME , 2008 .

[8]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes , 1999 .

[9]  Stephan Billinger,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Designing the Boundaries of the Firm: From "Make, Buy, or Ally" to the Dynamic Benefits of Vertical Architecture , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: the impact of within‐firm and interfirm expertise on concurrent sourcing of complementary components , 2009 .

[11]  M. Adelman The Large Firm and Its Suppliers , 1949 .

[12]  F. Geels Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective , 2005 .

[13]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[14]  Guido Buenstorf,et al.  Sequential production, modularity and technological change , 2005 .

[15]  Anne Parmigiani,et al.  Why Do Firms Both Make and Buy? An Investigation of Concurrent Sourcing , 2007 .

[16]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  The Implications of Product Architecture on the Firm , 2007 .

[17]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[18]  J. Potts Knowledge and markets , 2001 .

[19]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[20]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Of Diamonds and Rust: A New Look at Resources , 1995 .

[21]  Juliana H. Mikkola,et al.  Capturing the Degree of Modularity Embedded in Product Architectures , 2006 .

[22]  G. Dosi,et al.  Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems: on the co-evolution of competences, confl , 1995 .

[23]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[24]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Characterizing complex product architectures , 2004, Syst. Eng..

[25]  J. Doyle,et al.  Reverse Engineering of Biological Complexity , 2002, Science.

[26]  K. R. Harrigan Formulating Vertical Integration Strategies , 1984 .

[27]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Sourcing By Design: Product Complexity and the Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. , 2002, Psychological review.

[29]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[30]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[31]  Sebastian K. Fixson,et al.  Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions , 2005 .

[32]  D. P. Russell,et al.  Functional Clustering: Identifying Strongly Interactive Brain Regions in Neuroimaging Data , 1998, NeuroImage.

[33]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Complexity Theory in Organization Science: Seizing the Promise or Becoming a Fad? , 1999 .

[34]  Anna Grandori,et al.  A relational approach to organizational design , 2006 .

[35]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  principles in design , 1990 .

[36]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[37]  M. Lungarella,et al.  Information Self-Structuring: Key Principle for Learning and Development , 2005, Proceedings. The 4nd International Conference on Development and Learning, 2005..

[38]  Alan MacCormack,et al.  The Impact of Component Modularity on Design Evolution: Evidence from the Software Industry , 2007 .

[39]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[40]  M. Valente,et al.  Technological change and the vertical organization of industries , 2008 .

[41]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .

[42]  Mauro Lombardi A morphogenetic approach to the evolution of technological capabilities , 2008 .

[43]  Simon Li,et al.  A Formal Two-Phase Method for Decomposition of Complex Design Problems , 2005 .

[44]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[45]  G Tononi,et al.  A complexity measure for selective matching of signals by the brain. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Francesco Vatalaro,et al.  Ambient Intelligence: The Evolution of Technology, Communication and Cognition Towards the Future of Human-Computer Interaction , 2005 .

[47]  Sandro Montresor Resources, capabilities, competences and the theory of the firm , 2004 .

[48]  H. Kitano Systems Biology: A Brief Overview , 2002, Science.

[49]  Anna Grandori,et al.  Governance Structures, Coordination Mechanisms and Cognitive Models , 1997 .

[50]  Viktor Vanberg,et al.  Rational Choice vs. Program-based Behavior , 2002 .

[51]  R. Langlois,et al.  Innovation, Networks, and Vertical Integration , 1995 .

[52]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[53]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design Theory for Systems , 1998 .