A developmental analysis of the effect of stimulus orientation on recognition.

Subjects of various ages were tachistoscopically shown geometric figures that had a distinguishing cue at one end, and at the other end, a 'focal' feature that determines the apparent upright for young children. The orientation facilitating recognition changed with age; a developmental change in the starting position of a serial-processing mechanism is proposed. It is an old observation, both in psychology and in everyday experience, that the orientation of a form influences its phenomenal appearance and also its identifiability. The interpretation of such observations is complicated by the fact that there appear to be developmental changes in the observer's response to orientation-a young child may be content to look at an upside-down book, but the parent cannot read it that way.

[1]  Maynard C. Wheeler,et al.  Visual Acuity within the Area Centralis and its Relation to Eye Movements and Fixation , 1928 .

[2]  I. Rock,et al.  An experimental analysis of visual symmetry , 1963 .

[3]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  L. Ghent EFFECT OF ORIENTATION ON RECOGNITION OF GEOMETRIC FORMS BY RETARDED CHILDREN. , 1964, Child development.

[5]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Recognition of human faces from isolated facial features: A developmental study , 1966 .

[6]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Visual information processing of sequentially presented inputs: I. effects of input timing on sub-span storage and retrieval mechanisms’ , 1969 .

[7]  Bryden Mp,et al.  Accuracy and order of report in tachistoscopic recognition. , 1966 .

[8]  L. Ghent,et al.  Form and its orientation: a child's-eye view. , 1961, The American journal of psychology.

[9]  J. Goodnow,et al.  Orientations called “right-side up”: Effects of stimulus alignment , 1969 .

[10]  I. Howard,et al.  Human Spatial Orientation , 1966 .

[11]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Orientation of letters and their speed of recognition , 1969 .

[12]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Orientation of letters and errors in their recognition , 1969 .

[13]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect of retinal and phenomenal orientation on the perception of form. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  Visual perception of binary patterns by preschool children and by school children. , 1961 .

[16]  L. Ghent,et al.  Influence of the Orientation of Geometric Forms on Their Recognition by Children , 1961 .

[17]  L. Braine Asymmetries of pattern perception observed in Israelis , 1968 .

[18]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[19]  L. Braine Disorientation of forms: An examination of Rock’s theory , 1965 .

[20]  M. Takala Asymmetries of the visual space , 1951 .

[21]  Form and its orientation: reexamination of a child's-eye view. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[22]  L. Ghent Recognition by children of realistic figures presented in various orientations. , 1960, Canadian journal of psychology.

[23]  G. V. Dearborn Recognition under objective reversal. , 1899 .

[24]  I. Rock The orientation of forms on the retina and in the environment. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[25]  William K. Estes,et al.  Further evidence concerning scanning and sampling assumptions of visual detection models , 1968 .

[26]  D KIMURA,et al.  The effect of letter position on recognition. , 1959, Canadian journal of psychology.

[27]  H L Pick,et al.  Visual and tactual identification of form orientation. , 1966, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[28]  P. A. Kolers The recognition of geometrically transformed text , 1968 .