Effects of global MHD instability on operational high beta-regime in LHD

In the Large Helical Device (LHD), the highest operational averaged beta value has been expanded from 3.2% to 4% in the last 2 years by increasing the heating capability and exploring a new magnetic configuration with a high aspect ratio. Although the magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) stability properties are considered to be unfavourable in the new high aspect configuration, the heating efficiency due to neutral beams and the transport properties are expected to be favourable in a high-beta range. In order to clarify the effect of the global ideal MHD unstable mode on the operational regimes in helical systems, especially the beta gradients in the peripheral region and the beta value, the MHD analysis and the transport analysis are performed in a high-beta range of up to 4% in LHD. In a high-beta range of more than 3%, the maxima of the observed thermal pressure gradients at a low order rational magnetic surface in the peripheral region are marginally unstable to the low-mode-number ideal MHD instability. Though a gradual degradation of the local transport in the region has been observed as beta increases, a disruptive degradation of the local transport does not appear in the beta range up to 4%.

[1]  H. Yamada,et al.  Observation of the "self-healing" of an error field island in the large helical device. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[2]  A Cooper,et al.  Variational Formulation of the Linear Mhd Stability of 3d-Plasmas with Noninteracting Hot-Electrons , 1992 .

[3]  D. J. Campbell,et al.  Chapter 1: Overview and summary , 1999 .

[4]  H. Yamada,et al.  Temperature dependence of the thermal diffusivity in high-collisionality regimes in the large helical device , 2005 .

[5]  Kozo Yamazaki,et al.  Confinement physics study in a small low aspect ratio helical device: CHS , 1998 .

[6]  S. Murakami,et al.  Electron Pressure Profiles in High-Density Neutral Beam Heated Plasmas in the Large Helical Device , 2005 .

[7]  Y. Takeiri,et al.  Scalings of energy confinement and density limit in stellarator/heliotron devices , 1990 .

[8]  N. Yanagi,et al.  Ideal and resistive pressure gradient driven instabilities in Heliotron DR , 1989 .

[9]  Kozo Yamazaki,et al.  Design Study for the Large Helical Device , 1990 .

[10]  V. Shafranov,et al.  Plasma Confinement in Closed Magnetic Systems , 1970 .

[11]  Hideo Sugama,et al.  Velocity–space structures of distribution function in toroidal ion temperature gradient turbulence , 2011 .

[12]  R. A. Dory,et al.  SPECIAL TOPIC: Energy confinement scaling from the international stellarator database , 1995 .

[13]  Watanabe Hideo,et al.  Recent Progress of Varying Temperature Irradiation Experiments on Microstructure Development in Austenitic Stainless Steels , 2004 .

[14]  S. Murakami,et al.  Orbital aspects of reachable beta value in NBI heated heliotron/torsatrons , 1996 .

[15]  K. Kawahata,et al.  MHD characteristics in the high beta regime of the Large Helical Device , 2000 .

[16]  Osamu Kaneko,et al.  Progress of High-Beta Experiments in Stellarator/Heliotron , 2004 .

[17]  M. Shoji,et al.  An Overview of the Large Helical Device Project , 1998 .

[18]  J. C. Whitson,et al.  Steepest‐descent moment method for three‐dimensional magnetohydrodynamic equilibria , 1983 .

[19]  K. Ichiguchi,et al.  MHD instabilities in heliotron/torsatron , 1991 .

[20]  Kenji Harafuji,et al.  Computational study of three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic equilibria in toroidal helical systems , 1987 .

[21]  Kozo Yamazaki,et al.  MHD instabilities and their effects on plasma confinement in Large Helical Device plasmas , 2004 .

[22]  N. Yanagi,et al.  Effects of the magnetic axis shift on pressure driven MHD instabilities in Heliotron DR , 1992 .

[23]  Kozo Yamazaki,et al.  Recent advances in the LHD experiment , 2003 .

[24]  M. Wakatani,et al.  Radial electric field effect on resistive interchange modes , 1991 .

[25]  W. A. Cooper,et al.  Impact of heat deposition profile on global confinement of NBI heated plasmas in the LHD , 2003 .

[26]  Kozo Yamazaki,et al.  Configuration flexibility and extended regimes in Large Helical Device , 2001 .