Prospects and challenges of implementing DNA metabarcoding for high-throughput insect surveillance
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Charlie Pauvert,et al. Bioinformatics matters: The accuracy of plant and soil fungal community data is highly dependent on the metabarcoding pipeline , 2019, Fungal Ecology.
[2] L. Tedersoo,et al. Towards PacBio-based pan-eukaryote metabarcoding using full-length ITS sequences. , 2019, Environmental microbiology reports.
[3] A. Clarke,et al. Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is not invasive through Asia: It's been there all along , 2019, Journal of Applied Entomology.
[4] R. Haight,et al. Optimizing surveillance strategies for early detection of invasive alien species , 2019, Ecological Economics.
[5] William A. Walters,et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2 , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.
[6] G. Bai,et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of ABA receptor PYL/RCAR gene family reveals evolution and roles in drought stress in Nicotiana tabacum , 2019, BMC Genomics.
[7] Thomas W. A. Braukmann,et al. Validation of COI metabarcoding primers for terrestrial arthropods , 2019, PeerJ.
[8] T. Pape,et al. A simplified DNA extraction protocol for unsorted bulk arthropod samples that maintains exoskeletal integrity , 2019, Environmental DNA.
[9] A. Antich,et al. From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff , 2019, bioRxiv.
[10] Lin Schwarzkopf,et al. microDecon: A highly accurate read‐subtraction tool for the post‐sequencing removal of contamination in metabarcoding studies , 2019, Environmental DNA.
[11] M. Krosch,et al. A transcriptome‐based analytical workflow for identifying loci for species diagnosis: a case study with Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) , 2019 .
[12] A. Filipe,et al. Have the cake and eat it: Optimizing nondestructive DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrate samples for freshwater biomonitoring , 2019, Molecular ecology resources.
[13] Thomas W. A. Braukmann,et al. Metabarcoding a diverse arthropod mock community , 2019, Molecular ecology resources.
[14] Lawrence A. David,et al. Measuring and Mitigating PCR Bias in Microbiome Data , 2019, bioRxiv.
[15] Douglas W. Yu,et al. An efficient and robust laboratory workflow and tetrapod database for larger scale environmental DNA studies , 2019, GigaScience.
[16] Noah Fierer,et al. DNA metabarcoding—Need for robust experimental designs to draw sound ecological conclusions , 2019, Molecular ecology.
[17] Charles Y Chiu,et al. Clinical metagenomics , 2019, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[18] Charles C. Y. Xu,et al. One‐locus‐several‐primers: A strategy to improve the taxonomic and haplotypic coverage in diet metabarcoding studies , 2019, Ecology and evolution.
[19] F. Leese,et al. DNA metabarcoding from sample fixative as a quick and voucher-preserving biodiversity assessment method 1. , 2019, Genome.
[20] Carol A. Stepien,et al. Invasion genetics from eDNA and thousands of larvae: A targeted metabarcoding assay that distinguishes species and population variation of zebra and quagga mussels , 2019, Ecology and evolution.
[21] Benjamin J. Callahan,et al. Consistent and correctable bias in metagenomic sequencing experiments , 2019, bioRxiv.
[22] Douglas W. Yu,et al. SPIKEPIPE: A metagenomic pipeline for the accurate quantification of eukaryotic species occurrences and abundances using DNA barcodes or mitogenomes , 2019, bioRxiv.
[23] Wei Gu,et al. Clinical Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Detection. , 2019, Annual Review of Pathology.
[24] R. H. Nilsson,et al. Biodiversity assessments in the 21st century: the potential of insect traps to complement environmental samples for estimating eukaryotic and prokaryotic diversity using high-throughput DNA metabarcoding 1. , 2019, Genome.
[25] John-James Wilson,et al. High-throughput terrestrial biodiversity assessments: mitochondrial metabarcoding, metagenomics or metatranscriptomics? , 2019, Mitochondrial DNA. Part A, DNA mapping, sequencing, and analysis.
[26] L. Tedersoo,et al. High‐throughput identification and diagnostics of pathogens and pests: Overview and practical recommendations , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.
[27] M. Traugott,et al. A broadly applicable COI primer pair and an efficient single‐tube amplicon library preparation protocol for metabarcoding , 2018, Ecology and evolution.
[28] S. Gopalakrishnan,et al. Promises and pitfalls of using high‐throughput sequencing for diet analysis , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.
[29] M. Mcmullen. PM 7/98 (3) Specific requirements for laboratories preparing accreditation for a plant pest diagnostic activity , 2018, EPPO Bulletin.
[30] A. Vogler,et al. The contribution of mitochondrial metagenomics to large-scale data mining and phylogenetic analysis of Coleoptera. , 2018, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[31] Francesco Asnicar,et al. QIIME 2: Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science , 2018 .
[32] Douglas W. Yu,et al. Why the COI barcode should be the community DNA metabarcode for the metazoa , 2018, Molecular ecology.
[33] Frédéric J. J. Chain,et al. Metabarcoding using multiplexed markers increases species detection in complex zooplankton communities , 2018, Evolutionary applications.
[34] S. Massart,et al. The impact of high throughput sequencing on plant health diagnostics , 2018, European Journal of Plant Pathology.
[35] Richard E. Green,et al. Improving nanopore read accuracy with the R2C2 method enables the sequencing of highly multiplexed full-length single-cell cDNA , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[36] Berry J Brosi,et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of pollen DNA metabarcoding using constructed species mixtures , 2018, Molecular ecology.
[37] Ruth E Hanna,et al. A case of mistaken identity , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.
[38] Beth Shapiro,et al. Minimizing polymerase biases in metabarcoding. , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.
[39] Claude Thermes,et al. The Third Revolution in Sequencing Technology. , 2018, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[40] Émilie D. Tremblay,et al. Biosurveillance of forest insects: part I—integration and application of genomic tools to the surveillance of non-native forest insects , 2018, Journal of Pest Science.
[41] Ajay S. Gulati,et al. High-throughput amplicon sequencing of the full-length 16S rRNA gene with single-nucleotide resolution , 2018, bioRxiv.
[42] K. McKelvey,et al. Capture enrichment of aquatic environmental DNA: A first proof of concept , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.
[43] Ted Wong,et al. Synthetic microbe communities provide internal reference standards for metagenome sequencing and analysis , 2018, Nature Communications.
[44] C. Hardy,et al. Toward an ecoregion scale evaluation of eDNA metabarcoding primers: A case study for the freshwater fish biodiversity of the Murray–Darling Basin (Australia) , 2018, Ecology and evolution.
[45] D. Steinke,et al. Slippage of degenerate primers can cause variation in amplicon length , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[46] Vanessa A. Mata,et al. How much is enough? Effects of technical and biological replication on metabarcoding dietary analysis , 2018, Molecular ecology.
[47] G. Lear,et al. Opportunities and limitations for DNA metabarcoding in Australasian plant-pathogen biosecurity , 2018, Australasian Plant Pathology.
[48] Ryan R Wick,et al. Deepbinner: Demultiplexing barcoded Oxford Nanopore reads with deep convolutional neural networks , 2018, bioRxiv.
[49] M. A. Senar,et al. The choice of universal primers and the characteristics of the species mixture determine when DNA metabarcoding can be quantitative , 2018, Molecular ecology.
[50] Émilie D. Tremblay,et al. Biosurveillance of forest insects: part II—adoption of genomic tools by end user communities and barriers to integration , 2018, Journal of Pest Science.
[51] Antonio Olmos,et al. High-throughput sequencing technologies for plant pest diagnosis: challenges and opportunities , 2018, EPPO Bulletin.
[52] Luke R. Thompson,et al. Best practices for analysing microbiomes , 2018, Nature Reviews Microbiology.
[53] D. Rassati,et al. Improved biosecurity surveillance of non-native forest insects: a review of current methods , 2018, Journal of Pest Science.
[54] Aaron Pomerantz,et al. Nanopore sequencing of long ribosomal DNA amplicons enables portable and simple biodiversity assessments with high phylogenetic resolution across broad taxonomic scale , 2018, bioRxiv.
[55] J. Bengtsson-Palme,et al. A reference cytochrome c oxidase subunit I database curated for hierarchical classification of arthropod metabarcoding data , 2018, PeerJ.
[56] T. Porter,et al. Over 2.5 million COI sequences in GenBank and growing , 2018, bioRxiv.
[57] M. Mioduchowska,et al. Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too “universal”? , 2018, PloS one.
[58] A. Hoffmann,et al. Can non-destructive DNA extraction of bulk invertebrate samples be used for metabarcoding? , 2018, PeerJ.
[59] Jian Wang,et al. Reliable multiplex sequencing with rare index mis-assignment on DNB-based NGS platform , 2018, BMC Genomics.
[60] E. Britzke,et al. Multifaceted DNA metabarcoding: Validation of a noninvasive, next‐generation approach to studying bat populations , 2018, Evolutionary applications.
[61] Jonathan M Palmer,et al. Non-biological synthetic spike-in controls and the AMPtk software pipeline improve mycobiome data , 2018, PeerJ.
[62] W. Bolosky,et al. Laboratory validation of a clinical metagenomic sequencing assay for pathogen detection in cerebrospinal fluid , 2018, bioRxiv.
[63] Anders F. Andersson,et al. New mitochondrial primers for metabarcoding of insects, designed and evaluated using in silico methods , 2018, bioRxiv.
[64] Rickard Sandberg,et al. Computational correction of index switching in multiplexed sequencing libraries , 2018, Nature Methods.
[65] B. Deagle,et al. Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data? , 2018, bioRxiv.
[66] J. Fuhrman,et al. Taxon Disappearance from Microbiome Analysis Reinforces the Value of Mock Communities as a Standard in Every Sequencing Run , 2018, mSystems.
[67] Shaun P. Wilkinson,et al. Taxonomic identification of environmental DNA with informatic sequence classification trees. , 2018 .
[68] Jesse J. Salk,et al. Enhancing the accuracy of next-generation sequencing for detecting rare and subclonal mutations , 2018, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[69] J. Utzinger,et al. From laboratory to point of entry: development and implementation of a loop‐mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)‐based genetic identification system to prevent introduction of quarantine insect species , 2018, Pest management science.
[70] Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al. Automated high throughput animal CO1 metabarcode classification , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[71] D. Steinke,et al. Scaling upDNAmetabarcoding for freshwater macrozoobenthos monitoring , 2018, Freshwater Biology.
[72] Frédéric J. J. Chain,et al. Optimization and performance testing of a sequence processing pipeline applied to detection of nonindigenous species , 2018, Evolutionary applications.
[73] Wolfgang Nentwig,et al. Global rise in emerging alien species results from increased accessibility of new source pools , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[74] P. Taberlet,et al. Environmental DNA: For Biodiversity Research and Monitoring , 2018 .
[75] L. Tedersoo,et al. PacBio metabarcoding of Fungi and other eukaryotes: errors, biases and perspectives. , 2018, The New phytologist.
[76] M. Reichard,et al. Cryptic invasions: A review. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.
[77] Benjamin D. Kaehler,et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin , 2018, Microbiome.
[78] Michael K. Slevin,et al. Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing , 2018, BMC Genomics.
[79] Szymon T Calus,et al. NanoAmpli-Seq: a workflow for amplicon sequencing for mixed microbial communities on the nanopore sequencing platform , 2018, bioRxiv.
[80] R. Gillespie,et al. The effect of DNA degradation bias in passive sampling devices on metabarcoding studies of arthropod communities and their associated microbiota , 2018, PloS one.
[81] T. Porter,et al. Scaling up: A guide to high‐throughput genomic approaches for biodiversity analysis , 2018, Molecular ecology.
[82] Antton Alberdi,et al. Scrutinizing key steps for reliable metabarcoding of environmental samples , 2018 .
[83] A. Weigand,et al. A simple centrifugation protocol for metagenomic studies increases mitochondrial DNA yield by two orders of magnitude , 2017 .
[84] R. Gillespie,et al. Estimating and mitigating amplification bias in qualitative and quantitative arthropod metabarcoding , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[85] D. Relman,et al. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data , 2017, Microbiome.
[86] Jennifer L. Gardy,et al. Towards a genomics-informed, real-time, global pathogen surveillance system , 2017, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[87] Dennis A. Benson,et al. GenBank , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..
[88] Michelle A. Jusino,et al. Non-biological synthetic spike-in controls and the AMPtk software pipeline improve fungal high throughput amplicon sequencing data , 2017, bioRxiv.
[89] Jana Batovska,et al. Metagenomic arbovirus detection using MinION nanopore sequencing. , 2017, Journal of virological methods.
[90] Erin K. Grey,et al. Early detection monitoring for aquatic non-indigenous species: Optimizing surveillance, incorporating advanced technologies, and identifying research needs. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.
[91] Kristy Deiner,et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities , 2017, Molecular ecology.
[92] Douglas W. Yu,et al. Carrion fly‐derived DNA metabarcoding is an effective tool for mammal surveys: Evidence from a known tropical mammal community , 2017, Molecular ecology resources.
[93] Xin Zhou,et al. Filling reference gaps via assembling DNA barcodes using high-throughput sequencing—moving toward barcoding the world , 2017, GigaScience.
[94] Susan J. Nichols,et al. A DNA barcode database of Australia’s freshwater macroinvertebrate fauna , 2017 .
[95] Robert D. Finn,et al. Identifying accurate metagenome and amplicon software via a meta-analysis of sequence to taxonomy benchmarking studies , 2017, bioRxiv.
[96] Yossi Farjoun,et al. Characterization and remediation of sample index swaps by non-redundant dual indexing on massively parallel sequencing platforms , 2017, BMC Genomics.
[97] C. Huttenhower,et al. Assessment of variation in microbial community amplicon sequencing by the Microbiome Quality Control (MBQC) project consortium , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.
[98] Richard E. Davis,et al. Australian plant biosecurity surveillance systems , 2017 .
[99] Sujeevan Ratnasingham,et al. A Sequel to Sanger: amplicon sequencing that scales , 2017, bioRxiv.
[100] Walter Jetz,et al. A vision for global monitoring of biological invasions , 2017 .
[101] David J. Winter,et al. rentrez: An R package for the NCBI eUtils API , 2017, R J..
[102] Ilyas Potamitis,et al. Automated Remote Insect Surveillance at a Global Scale and the Internet of Things , 2017, Robotics.
[103] Theo W. Prins,et al. Development and validation of a multi-locus DNA metabarcoding method to identify endangered species in complex samples , 2017, GigaScience.
[104] F. Leese,et al. Sorting things out: Assessing effects of unequal specimen biomass on DNA metabarcoding , 2017, Ecology and evolution.
[105] Alireza Tamaddoni-Nezhad,et al. Next-Generation Global Biomonitoring: Large-scale, Automated Reconstruction of Ecological Networks. , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[106] Stefano Lonardi,et al. Comprehensive benchmarking and ensemble approaches for metagenomic classifiers , 2017, Genome Biology.
[107] M. Galan,et al. Metabarcoding for the parallel identification of several hundred predators and their preys: application to bat species diet analysis , 2017, bioRxiv.
[108] Ira W. Deveson,et al. Reference standards for next-generation sequencing , 2017, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[109] Andrew M. Liebhold,et al. Invasion Science: A Horizon Scan of Emerging Challenges and Opportunities. , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[110] F. Leese,et al. Validation and Development of COI Metabarcoding Primers for Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment , 2017, Front. Environ. Sci..
[111] Carol A. Stepien,et al. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding assays to detect invasive invertebrate species in the Great Lakes , 2017, PloS one.
[112] J. Darbro,et al. Effective mosquito and arbovirus surveillance using metabarcoding , 2017, Molecular ecology resources.
[113] F. Leese,et al. PrimerMiner: an r package for development and in silico validation of DNA metabarcoding primers , 2017 .
[114] John R. Kelly,et al. Sensitivity and accuracy of high-throughput metabarcoding methods for early detection of invasive fish species , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[115] I. Weissman,et al. Index switching causes “spreading-of-signal” among multiplexed samples in Illumina HiSeq 4000 DNA sequencing , 2017, bioRxiv.
[116] J. Freeland,et al. The importance of molecular markers and primer design when characterizing biodiversity from environmental DNA. , 2017, Genome.
[117] Nancy Knowlton,et al. Random sampling causes the low reproducibility of rare eukaryotic OTUs in Illumina COI metabarcoding , 2017, PeerJ.
[118] Nancy Knowlton,et al. Metazoan mitochondrial gene sequence reference datasets for taxonomic assignment of environmental samples , 2017, Scientific Data.
[119] Paul J. McMurdie,et al. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis , 2017, The ISME Journal.
[120] Jose A Navas-Molina,et al. Deblur Rapidly Resolves Single-Nucleotide Community Sequence Patterns , 2017, mSystems.
[121] L. Zinger,et al. Vector soup: high‐throughput identification of Neotropical phlebotomine sand flies using metabarcoding , 2017, Molecular ecology resources.
[122] Robert Schlaberg,et al. Validation of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Tests for Universal Pathogen Detection. , 2017, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[123] G. Guillera‐Arroita. Modelling of species distributions, range dynamics and communities under imperfect detection: advances, challenges and opportunities , 2017 .
[124] Vladimir Potapov,et al. Examining Sources of Error in PCR by Single-Molecule Sequencing , 2017, PloS one.
[125] R. Micura,et al. Distinct 5-methylcytosine profiles in poly(A) RNA from mouse embryonic stem cells and brain , 2017, Genome Biology.
[126] Michael J. O. Pocock,et al. Merging DNA metabarcoding and ecological network analysis to understand and build resilient terrestrial ecosystems , 2016 .
[127] E. Wright,et al. Quality filtering of Illumina index reads mitigates sample cross-talk , 2016, BMC Genomics.
[128] A. Vogler,et al. Lessons from genome skimming of arthropod‐preserving ethanol , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.
[129] Neil Boonham,et al. DNA barcoding for biosecurity: case studies from the UK plant protection program. , 2016, Genome.
[130] Reuben P. Keller,et al. Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management , 2016 .
[131] Ben Nichols,et al. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics , 2016, PeerJ.
[132] Robert C. Edgar,et al. UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing , 2016, bioRxiv.
[133] Céline Bellard,et al. Massive yet grossly underestimated global costs of invasive insects , 2016, Nature Communications.
[134] Frédéric J. J. Chain,et al. Early detection of aquatic invaders using metabarcoding reveals a high number of non‐indigenous species in Canadian ports , 2016 .
[135] R. Henrik Nilsson,et al. Unbiased probabilistic taxonomic classification for DNA barcoding , 2016, Bioinform..
[136] Thierry Candresse,et al. A Framework for the Evaluation of Biosecurity, Commercial, Regulatory, and Scientific Impacts of Plant Viruses and Viroids Identified by NGS Technologies , 2016, Front. Microbiol..
[137] Robert C. Edgar,et al. SINTAX: a simple non-Bayesian taxonomy classifier for 16S and ITS sequences , 2016, bioRxiv.
[138] Amir Feizi,et al. Strategies to improve usability and preserve accuracy in biological sequence databases , 2016, Proteomics.
[139] Xavier Pochon,et al. Targeted gene enrichment and high‐throughput sequencing for environmental biomonitoring: a case study using freshwater macroinvertebrates , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.
[140] A. Vogler,et al. Metabarcoding and mitochondrial metagenomics of endogean arthropods to unveil the mesofauna of the soil , 2016 .
[141] Muhammad Ashfaq,et al. DNA barcodes for bio-surveillance: regulated and economically important arthropod plant pests. , 2016, Genome.
[142] J. Olden,et al. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities , 2016, Nature Communications.
[143] Douglas W. Yu,et al. Quantifying uncertainty of taxonomic placement in DNA barcoding and metabarcoding , 2016, bioRxiv.
[144] Lisa Kalman,et al. Assuring the Quality of Next-Generation Sequencing in Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratories , 2016, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[145] I. Tzanetakis,et al. Quarantine Regulations and the Impact of Modern Detection Methods. , 2016, Annual review of phytopathology.
[146] Dan Knights,et al. Systematic improvement of amplicon marker gene methods for increased accuracy in microbiome studies , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.
[147] Tony Brooks,et al. Accurate Sample Assignment in a Multiplexed, Ultrasensitive, High-Throughput Sequencing Assay for Minimal Residual Disease. , 2016, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.
[148] N. Kaneko,et al. A quantitative protocol for DNA metabarcoding of springtails (Collembola). , 2016, Genome.
[149] D. Paini,et al. Global threat to agriculture from invasive species , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[150] D. Lodge,et al. Estimating species richness using environmental DNA , 2016, Ecology and evolution.
[151] J. McPherson,et al. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[152] Kristine Bohmann,et al. DAMe: a toolkit for the initial processing of datasets with PCR replicates of double-tagged amplicons for DNA metabarcoding analyses , 2016, BMC Research Notes.
[153] B. Deagle,et al. Quantitative DNA metabarcoding: improved estimates of species proportional biomass using correction factors derived from control material , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.
[154] José J Lahoz-Monfort,et al. Statistical approaches to account for false‐positive errors in environmental DNA samples , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.
[155] Pierre Taberlet,et al. How to limit false positives in environmental DNA and metabarcoding? , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.
[156] Paul J. McMurdie,et al. DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data , 2016, Nature Methods.
[157] K. Brown,et al. Molecular identification of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in southeastern Australia , 2016, Ecology and evolution.
[158] Douglas W. Yu,et al. Mitochondrial metagenomics: letting the genes out of the bottle , 2016, GigaScience.
[159] Alan Hastings,et al. Eradication of Invading Insect Populations: From Concepts to Applications. , 2016, Annual review of entomology.
[160] Pelin Yilmaz,et al. Phylogeny-aware identification and correction of taxonomically mislabeled sequences , 2016, bioRxiv.
[161] Josiane P Lafleur,et al. Recent advances in lab-on-a-chip for biosensing applications. , 2016, Biosensors & bioelectronics.
[162] A. Vogler,et al. Metabarcoding of fungal communities associated with bark beetles , 2016, Ecology and evolution.
[163] C. Bleidorn. Third generation sequencing: technology and its potential impact on evolutionary biodiversity research , 2016 .
[164] J. Good,et al. Targeted capture in evolutionary and ecological genomics , 2016, Molecular ecology.
[165] C. Wilson,et al. Recognizing false positives: synthetic oligonucleotide controls for environmental DNA surveillance , 2016 .
[166] P. Taberlet,et al. obitools: a unix‐inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.
[167] Robert C. Edgar,et al. Error filtering, pair assembly and error correction for next-generation sequencing reads , 2015, Bioinform..
[168] Kristine Bohmann,et al. Tag jumps illuminated – reducing sequence‐to‐sample misidentifications in metabarcoding studies , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.
[169] X. Wang,et al. Mitochondrial capture enriches mito‐DNA 100 fold, enabling PCR‐free mitogenomics biodiversity analysis , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.
[170] P. Lim,et al. DNA metabarcoding of insects and allies: an evaluation of primers and pipelines , 2015, Bulletin of Entomological Research.
[171] Bernhard Schölkopf,et al. Shifts of Gamma Phase across Primary Visual Cortical Sites Reflect Dynamic Stimulus-Modulated Information Transfer , 2015, PLoS biology.
[172] A. Vogler,et al. Validating the power of mitochondrial metagenomics for community ecology and phylogenetics of complex assemblages , 2015 .
[173] Andrew M. Liebhold,et al. Benefits of invasion prevention: Effect of time lags, spread rates, and damage persistence , 2015 .
[174] Kessy Abarenkov,et al. Standardizing metadata and taxonomic identification in metabarcoding studies , 2015, GigaScience.
[175] Vasco Elbrecht,et al. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass—Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol , 2015, PloS one.
[176] Guanliang Meng,et al. High‐throughput monitoring of wild bee diversity and abundance via mitogenomics , 2015, Methods in ecology and evolution.
[177] Y. Sanz,et al. Species-level resolution of 16S rRNA gene amplicons sequenced through the MinION™ portable nanopore sequencer , 2015, bioRxiv.
[178] P. Taberlet,et al. Metagenome skimming for phylogenetic community ecology: a new era in biodiversity research , 2015, Molecular ecology.
[179] M. Schatz,et al. Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical? , 2015, PLoS biology.
[180] J. Piñol,et al. Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high‐throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.
[181] L. Handley. How will the ‘molecular revolution’ contribute to biological recording? , 2015 .
[182] S. Nagai,et al. Bioinformatic Amplicon Read Processing Strategies Strongly Affect Eukaryotic Diversity and the Taxonomic Composition of Communities , 2015, PloS one.
[183] J. Lopes,et al. Insect-borne plant pathogenic bacteria: getting a ride goes beyond physical contact. , 2015, Current opinion in insect science.
[184] Frédéric J. J. Chain,et al. Divergence thresholds and divergent biodiversity estimates: can metabarcoding reliably describe zooplankton communities? , 2015, Ecology and evolution.
[185] Jullien M. Flynn,et al. Toward accurate molecular identification of species in complex environmental samples: testing the performance of sequence filtering and clustering methods , 2015, Ecology and evolution.
[186] A. Whitfield,et al. Insect vector-mediated transmission of plant viruses. , 2015, Virology.
[187] Stuart R. Dennis,et al. Transposable elements as agents of rapid adaptation may explain the genetic paradox of invasive species , 2015, Molecular ecology.
[188] P. Taberlet,et al. Replication levels, false presences and the estimation of the presence/absence from eDNA metabarcoding data , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.
[189] Michael Bunce,et al. From Benchtop to Desktop: Important Considerations when Designing Amplicon Sequencing Workflows , 2015, PloS one.
[190] K. Peay,et al. Parsing ecological signal from noise in next generation amplicon sequencing. , 2015, The New phytologist.
[191] M. Evander,et al. Detection and isolation of Sindbis virus from mosquitoes captured during an outbreak in Sweden, 2013. , 2015, Vector borne and zoonotic diseases.
[192] F. Viard,et al. DNA (meta)barcoding of biological invasions: a powerful tool to elucidate invasion processes and help managing aliens , 2015, Biological Invasions.
[193] C. Quince,et al. Insight into biases and sequencing errors for amplicon sequencing with the Illumina MiSeq platform , 2015, Nucleic acids research.
[194] M. Wilkinson,et al. Quantitative evaluation of bias in PCR amplification and next-generation sequencing derived from metabarcoding samples , 2015, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.
[195] Margaret Byrne,et al. Biological invasions, climate change and genomics , 2014, Evolutionary applications.
[196] Paul Turner,et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses , 2014, BMC Biology.
[197] A. Zhang,et al. Existence of species complex largely reduced barcoding success for invasive species of Tephritidae: a case study in Bactrocera spp. , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.
[198] L. Weyrich,et al. Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silico PCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.
[199] M. Whiting,et al. Rampant Nuclear Insertion of mtDNA across Diverse Lineages within Orthoptera (Insecta) , 2014, PloS one.
[200] François Pompanon,et al. DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match , 2014, Biology Letters.
[201] Craig Moritz,et al. Sequence capture using PCR‐generated probes: a cost‐effective method of targeted high‐throughput sequencing for nonmodel organisms , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.
[202] F. Not,et al. Intracellular Diversity of the V4 and V9 Regions of the 18S rRNA in Marine Protists (Radiolarians) Assessed by High-Throughput Sequencing , 2014, PloS one.
[203] James Haile,et al. Who's for dinner? High‐throughput sequencing reveals bat dietary differentiation in a biodiversity hotspot where prey taxonomy is largely undescribed , 2014, Molecular ecology.
[204] Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al. Simultaneous assessment of the macrobiome and microbiome in a bulk sample of tropical arthropods through DNA metasystematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[205] Carolyn Sue Richards,et al. Methods-based proficiency testing in molecular genetic pathology. , 2014, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.
[206] Wolfgang Nentwig,et al. A Unified Classification of Alien Species Based on the Magnitude of their Environmental Impacts , 2014, PLoS biology.
[207] P. Genovesi,et al. Biological invaders are threats to human health: an overview , 2014 .
[208] P. Taberlet,et al. DNA metabarcoding multiplexing and validation of data accuracy for diet assessment: application to omnivorous diet , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.
[209] Kabir G. Peay,et al. Sequence Depth, Not PCR Replication, Improves Ecological Inference from Next Generation DNA Sequencing , 2014, PloS one.
[210] Peter Whittle,et al. A method for designing complex biosecurity surveillance systems: detecting non‐indigenous species of invertebrates on Barrow Island , 2013 .
[211] R. Murphy,et al. Assessing DNA Barcoding as a Tool for Species Identification and Data Quality Control , 2013, PloS one.
[212] R. Cruickshank,et al. The seven deadly sins of DNA barcoding , 2012, Molecular ecology resources.
[213] Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al. Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol , 2012, BMC Ecology.
[214] L. Kubatko,et al. DNA barcoding invasive insects: database roadblocks , 2012, Invertebrate Systematics.
[215] Daniel L. Lindner,et al. Don't make a mista(g)ke: is tag switching an overlooked source of error in amplicon pyrosequencing studies? , 2012 .
[216] Nicholas A. Bokulich,et al. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing , 2012, Nature Methods.
[217] Michael Traugott,et al. Advances in multiplex PCR: balancing primer efficiencies and improving detection success , 2012, Methods in ecology and evolution.
[218] B. Faircloth,et al. Not All Sequence Tags Are Created Equal: Designing and Validating Sequence Identification Tags Robust to Indels , 2012, PloS one.
[219] Andrew M. Liebhold,et al. Optimal surveillance and eradication of invasive species in heterogeneous landscapes. , 2012, Ecology letters.
[220] T. Davis,et al. Spotted Wing Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Trapped with Combinations of Wines and Vinegars , 2012 .
[221] M. P. Cummings,et al. A comparative evaluation of sequence classification programs , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.
[222] M. Malipatil,et al. Barcoding Queensland Fruit Flies (Bactrocera tryoni): impediments and improvements , 2012, Molecular ecology resources.
[223] Holly M. Bik,et al. Sequencing our way towards understanding global eukaryotic biodiversity. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[224] P. Taberlet,et al. Towards next‐generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[225] Qiong Wang,et al. Using the RDP Classifier to Predict Taxonomic Novelty and Reduce the Search Space for Finding Novel Organisms , 2012, PloS one.
[226] G. Bao,et al. In vitro quantification of specific microRNA using molecular beacons , 2011, Nucleic acids research.
[227] J. Majer,et al. Documenting the terrestrial invertebrate fauna of Barrow Island, Western Australia , 2011 .
[228] Martin Kircher,et al. Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform , 2011, Nucleic acids research.
[229] Rob Knight,et al. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection , 2011, Bioinform..
[230] Xue-xin Chen,et al. Utility of Multi-Gene Loci for Forensic Species Diagnosis of Blowflies , 2011, Journal of insect science.
[231] B. Haas,et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. , 2011, Genome research.
[232] Thierry Grange,et al. An Efficient Multistrategy DNA Decontamination Procedure of PCR Reagents for Hypersensitive PCR Applications , 2010, PloS one.
[233] Cameron J. Brumley,et al. A rapid non-destructive DNA extraction method for insects and other arthropods , 2010 .
[234] François Pompanon,et al. An In silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes , 2010, BMC Genomics.
[235] Bruno Nevado,et al. Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.
[236] K. Armstrong. DNA barcoding: a new module in New Zealand’s plant biosecurity diagnostic toolbox , 2010 .
[237] J. Unger,et al. International diagnostic protocols for regulated plant pests , 2010 .
[238] Jeremy R. deWaard,et al. Common goals: policy implications of DNA barcoding as a protocol for identification of arthropod pests , 2010, Biological Invasions.
[239] Emily H Turner,et al. Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing , 2010, Nature Methods.
[240] Martin Hartmann,et al. Introducing mothur: Open-Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
[241] Peter Whittle,et al. Info-gap theory and robust design of surveillance for invasive species: the case study of Barrow Island. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.
[242] P. Somboon,et al. Mitochondrial pseudogenes in the nuclear genome of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes: implications for past and future population genetic studies , 2009, BMC Genetics.
[243] P. Hulme. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization , 2009 .
[244] M. Tixier-Boichard,et al. Genetic analysis of local Vietnamese chickens provides evidence of gene flow from wild to domestic populations , 2009, BMC Genetics.
[245] L Joe Moffitt,et al. Robust detection protocols for uncertain introductions of invasive species. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.
[246] K. Crandall,et al. Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[247] J. Landry,et al. A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis , 2008, BMC Genomics.
[248] Antoine Danchin,et al. Persistence drives gene clustering in bacterial genomes , 2008, BMC Genomics.
[249] J. Tiedje,et al. Naïve Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
[250] H. Mooney,et al. Invasive Alien Species in an Era of Globalization , 2007 .
[251] P. Hebert,et al. bold: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org) , 2007, Molecular ecology notes.
[252] John A. Darling,et al. DNA-based methods for monitoring invasive species: a review and prospectus , 2007, Biological Invasions.
[253] Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al. A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded , 2006 .
[254] R. Gutell,et al. Characteristics of the nuclear (18S, 5.8S, 28S and 5S) and mitochondrial (12S and 16S) rRNA genes of Apis mellifera (Insecta: Hymenoptera): structure, organization, and retrotransposable elements , 2006, Insect molecular biology.
[255] C. Meyer,et al. DNA Barcoding: Error Rates Based on Comprehensive Sampling , 2005, PLoS biology.
[256] S. Ball,et al. DNA barcodes for biosecurity: invasive species identification , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[257] T. Work,et al. Arrival rate of nonindigenous insect species into the United States through foreign trade , 2005, Biological Invasions.
[258] Alejandro B. Thiermann. Globalization, international trade and animal health: the new roles of OIE. , 2005, Preventive veterinary medicine.
[259] Mark C Andersen,et al. Risk Assessment for Invasive Species , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[260] Gritta Schrader,et al. Plant Quarantine as a Measure Against Invasive Alien Species: The Framework of the International Plant Protection Convention and the plant health regulations in the European Union , 2003, Biological Invasions.
[261] P. Hebert,et al. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[262] R. ffrench-Constant,et al. A Single P450 Allele Associated with Insecticide Resistance in Drosophila , 2002, Science.
[263] L. Koski,et al. The Closest BLAST Hit Is Often Not the Nearest Neighbor , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[264] D. Hartl,et al. Mitochondrial pseudogenes: evolution's misplaced witnesses. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[265] A. Clarke,et al. A rapid method of estimating catches of abundant fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in modified Steiner traps , 2000 .
[266] P Green,et al. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. , 1998, Genome research.
[267] P. Green,et al. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. , 1998, Genome research.
[268] R. Vrijenhoek,et al. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. , 1994, Molecular marine biology and biotechnology.
[269] T. Lindahl. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA , 1993, Nature.
[270] E. Myers,et al. Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.
[271] Recommendation on: Preparing to use high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies as a diagnostic tool for phytosanitary purposes , 2019 .
[272] John D Pfeifer,et al. In Silico Proficiency Testing for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing. , 2017, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.
[273] W. L. Chadderton,et al. Active and passive environmental DNA surveillance of aquatic invasive species , 2016 .
[274] PM 7/129 (2) DNA barcoding as an identification tool for a number of regulated pests , 2016, EPPO Bulletin.
[275] K. Mengersen,et al. The relationship between biosecurity surveillance and risk analysis. , 2015 .
[276] Kerrie Mengersen,et al. Getting the story straight: laying the foundations for statistical evaluation of the performance of surveillance. , 2015 .
[277] Andrew M. Liebhold,et al. Designing efficient surveys: spatial arrangement of sample points for detection of invasive species , 2014, Biological Invasions.
[278] Hadley Wickham,et al. ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2 , 2013, R J..
[279] J. Aronson,et al. Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[280] Bernhard Seifert,et al. Integrative taxonomy: a multisource approach to exploring biodiversity. , 2010, Annual review of entomology.
[281] Marc Kenis,et al. Ecological effects of invasive alien insects , 2008, Biological Invasions.
[282] Alexander F. Auch,et al. Access the most recent version at doi: 10.1101/gr.5969107 References Open Access , 2007 .
[283] Peter-Tobias Stoll,et al. Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures , 2007 .
[284] S. Ratnasingham,et al. BOLD : The Barcode of Life Data System (www.barcodinglife.org) , 2007 .