Valuing New South Wales Rivers for Use in Benefit Transfer

The results from seven choice modelling applications designed to value improved river health in New South Wales are reported. These applications were designed to provide value estimates that could be used, through benefit transfer, to value improvements in the health of other rivers within the state. Because of limitations on the number of rivers that could be valued and populations sampled, a pooled model for use in benefit transfer was also estimated. The results indicate that both use and non-use values were found to exist for all catchments. In addition, value estimates were found to differ across catchments when populations resident within catchments were sampled. However, when populations resident outside catchments were sampled for two of these catchments, value estimates were found to be statistically similar. This indicates the importance of valuing improved river health in specific catchments by sampling populations within catchments. Yet, it also indicates that it is less critical to conduct multiple surveys of residents outside catchments to value improved river health.

[1]  Richard G. Walsh,et al.  Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality , 1985 .

[2]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Implementing the Convolutions Approach: A Companion to "Measuring the Difference (X-Y) of Simulated Distributions: A Convolutions Approach" , 1994 .

[3]  J. Bennett,et al.  Towards the Development of a Transferable Set of Value Estimates for Environmental Attributes , 2004 .

[4]  J. Loomis,et al.  The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California , 1997 .

[5]  Helen R. Neill,et al.  Benefit Transfers: Conceptual and Empirical Issues , 1992 .

[6]  J. Bennett,et al.  Valuing the Environmental Attributes of NSW Rivers , 2002 .

[7]  Jerry A. Hausman and Paul A. Ruud.,et al.  Specifying and Testing Econometric Models for Rank-ordered Data with an Application to the Demand for Mobile and Portable Telephones , 1986 .

[8]  Russell Blamey,et al.  Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer , 2002 .

[9]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[10]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[11]  D. McFadden,et al.  Specification tests for the multinomial logit model , 1984 .

[12]  John B. Loomis,et al.  The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer: Benefit Function Transfer , 1992 .

[13]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Attribute Causality in Environmental Choice Modelling , 2002 .

[14]  J. Bennett.  A THRESHOLD VALUE ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED FOREST RESERVES , 1999 .

[15]  C. Kling,et al.  The Implications of Model Specification for Welfare Estimation in Nested Logit Models , 1996 .

[16]  T. Stevens,et al.  INTERPRETATION AND TEMPORAL STABILITY OF CV BIDS FOR WILDLIFE EXISTENCE - A PANEL STUDY , 1994 .

[17]  J. Bennett,et al.  Minimising Payment Vehicle Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies , 2000 .

[18]  George R. Parsons,et al.  Benefits transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies , 1992 .

[19]  Mark Morrison,et al.  Aggregation Biases in Stated Preference Studies , 2000 .

[20]  William H. Greene,et al.  NLOGIT version 3.0 : reference guide , 2002 .

[21]  E P Kroes,et al.  STATED PREFERENCE TECHNIQUES: A GUIDE TO PRACTICE , 1990 .