Towards mindful case study research in IS: a critical analysis of the past ten years

Case study research (CSR) has gained strong acceptance in information systems (IS) research in the recent decades. This article examines how CSR has been used in IS research practice. Contrasting the currently used CSR approaches to methodological prescriptions can lead to recommendations for researchers applying this research strategy as well as to advances in the methodological literature. Our study design comprises two steps. First, we identified case studies published in six major IS journals from 2001 to 2010. Second, we critically examined CSR practices in the identified studies. We observed a dualism, as CSR currently consists of a positivist and an equally strong interpretive research stream. Case studies with other philosophical underpinnings were rarely found. We describe the CSR practice and contrast it to the methodological prescriptions. Thereby, we clearly point out the shortcomings, aiming to initiate a debate on how our community should further develop its use of CSR to become more mindful. This study is the first broad examination of CSR in IS (focusing on more than just the positivist research stream) and thus contributes to the methodological literature by providing recommendations for improvements.

[1]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Using A Positivist Case Research Methodology To Test Three Competing Theories-In-Use Of Business Process Redesign , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Robert M. O'Keefe,et al.  Trust, planning and benefits in a global interorganizational system , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[3]  S. Merriam Qualitative Case Studies , 2010 .

[4]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  An assessment of package–organisation misalignment: institutional and ontological structures , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Tamara Babaian,et al.  Using informal notes for sharing corporate technology know-how , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  Configuring peer-to-peer software: an empirical study of how users react to the regulatory features of software , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Building operations management theory through case and field research , 1998 .

[9]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Turning a Community into a Market: A Practice Perspective on Information Technology Use in Boundary Spanning , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[11]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[12]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2000, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Enabling Customer-Centricity Using Wikis and the Wiki Way , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Jon Heales,et al.  Reliability factors in business software: volatility, requirements and end-users , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[15]  Heinz K. Klein,et al.  Knowledge and Methods in IS Research: From Beginnings to the Future , 1999, New Information Technologies in Organizational Processes.

[16]  Janice M. Burn,et al.  Assessing the benefits from e-business transformation through effective enterprise management , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  F. Quek,et al.  Qualitative research in information systems: time to be subjective? , 1997 .

[18]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Influencing the effectiveness of IT governance practices through steering committees and communication policies , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[20]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Trust-Supporting Components in Virtual Communities for Patients , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Wing Lam,et al.  Investigating success factors in enterprise application integration: a case-driven analysis , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Guy Paré,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Positivist Case Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic,et al.  Exploring the critical agenda in information systems research , 2008 .

[24]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[25]  W. Gibb Dyer,et al.  Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt , 1991 .

[26]  Michael Grimsley,et al.  e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  The ethical nature of critical research in information systems , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[28]  S. Jack,et al.  Qualitative case study methodology in nursing research: an integrative review. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[29]  R. Piekkari,et al.  The Case Study as Disciplinary Convention , 2009 .

[30]  Albert Boonstra,et al.  Structure and analysis of IS decision-making processes , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Exploring relationships in information technology outsourcing: the interaction approach , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[34]  Chava Nachmias,et al.  Research Methods in the Social Sciences , 1976 .

[35]  Wesley S. Shu,et al.  Will the New Economy Emerge as Information Technology Pays Off? , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting Critical Research in Information Systems , 2011, MIS Q..

[37]  W. Orlikowski The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[38]  H. Bernard,et al.  Data Management and Analysis Methods , 2000 .

[39]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[40]  Akemi Takeoka Chatfield,et al.  A contingency model for creating value from RFID supply chain network projects in logistics and manufacturing environments , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[41]  R. Stake Qualitative Case Studies. , 2005 .

[42]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  What Does the Best is Research Look like? An Analysis of the AIS Basket of Top journals , 2011, PACIS.

[43]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Meeting the Burden of Proof with Case-Study Research , 2011 .

[44]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  S. Read Applications of Case Study Research , 2003 .

[46]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[47]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[48]  David R. Firth,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 2011 .

[49]  Nicolas Lesca,et al.  Strategic scanning project failure and abandonment factors: lessons learned , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[50]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[51]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Software architectures: Blueprint, Literature, Language or Decision? , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Information Systems as a Reference Discipline , 2002, MIS Q..

[53]  C. Bauer The Circuits-of-Power Framework for Studying Power in Institutionalization of Information Systems , 2003 .

[54]  Allen S. Lee Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research , 1991 .

[55]  Michael I. Barrett,et al.  Electronic trading and the process of globalization in traditional futures exchanges: a temporal perspective , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Adam Lindgreen,et al.  What makes a good case study? A positivist review of qualitative case research published in Industrial Marketing Management, 1971–2006 , 2010 .

[57]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  John Mingers,et al.  The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information systems literature , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[59]  Gianluca Miscione,et al.  Telemedicine in the Upper Amazon: Interplay with Local Health Care Practices , 2007, MIS Q..

[60]  Patricia Carlson,et al.  A Review of MIS Research and Disciplinary Development , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[62]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Exploring the supply-side of IT outsourcing: evaluating the emerging role of application service providers , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[63]  A. Cutler Methodical failure: the use of case study method by public relations researchers , 2004 .

[64]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[65]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  A re-conceptualization of the interpretive flexibility of information technologies: redressing the balance between the social and the technical , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[66]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  Bridging User Organizations: Knowledge Brokering and the Work of Information Technology Professionals , 2004, MIS Q..

[67]  E. Langer,et al.  The Construct of Mindfulness , 2000 .

[68]  Yu Zhao,et al.  The process of enterprise resource planning implementation and business process re‐engineering: tales from two Chinese small and medium‐sized enterprises , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[69]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[70]  Edgar A. Maldonado The Process of Introducing FLOSS in the Public Administration: The Case of Venezuela , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[71]  Philip Powell,et al.  SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[72]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[73]  Sanjaya Mishra,et al.  Research methods in the social sciences , 2005 .

[74]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Two-Stage Offshoring: An Investigation of the Irish Bridge , 2008, MIS Q..

[75]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[76]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[77]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[78]  Mireia Valverde,et al.  Waiting in line for online services: a qualitative study of the user's perspective , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[79]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[80]  Allen S. Lee A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies , 1989, MIS Q..

[81]  Paul Matthyssens,et al.  Involving the process dimensions of time in case-based research , 2010 .

[82]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  From the Vendor's Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in Information Technology Outsourcing 1, 2 , 2003 .

[83]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[84]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[85]  James Backhouse,et al.  The Circuits-of-Power Framework for Studying Power in Institutionalization of Information Systems , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[86]  Andrew Basden,et al.  Enabling a Kleinian integration of interpretivist and socio-critical IS research: the contribution of Dooyeweerd's philosophy , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[87]  Rebecca Piekkari,et al.  ‘Good’ case research in industrial marketing: Insights from research practice , 2010 .

[88]  Ron Weber,et al.  Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[89]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  User participation in decision support systems development: Influencing system outcomes , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[90]  G. Paré Investigating Information Systems with Positivist Case Study Research , 2004 .

[91]  Colin Ashurst,et al.  Improving the impact of IT development projects: the benefits realization capability model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[92]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Strategic Alignment In Mergers And Acquisitions: Theorizing IS Integration Decision making , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[93]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Influence of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Management Practices , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[94]  J. Whitney Case Study Research , 1999 .

[95]  Karen Locke,et al.  Composing Qualitative Research , 1997 .

[96]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Information Technology Governance in Information Technology Investment Decision Processes: The Impact of Investment Characteristics, External Environment, and Internal Context , 2008, MIS Q..

[97]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Multiple Group Coordination in Complex and Dynamic Task Environments: Interruptions, Coping Mechanisms, and Technology Recommendations , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[98]  Weidong Xia,et al.  Toward Agile: An Integrated Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Field Data , 2010, MIS Q..

[99]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[100]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[101]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Questioning the IT artefact: user practices that can, could, and cannot be supported in packaged-software designs , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[102]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[103]  Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic,et al.  Doing critical information systems research – arguments for a critical research methodology , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[104]  A. Stinchcombe Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[105]  Jon Jasperson,et al.  Managing change in an information systems development organization: understanding developer transitions from a structured to an object‐oriented development environment 1 , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[106]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001 , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[107]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[108]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..