Dissociation of response inhibition and performance monitoring in the stop signal task using event‐related fMRI

We examined the neural substrate of motor response inhibition and performance monitoring in the stop signal task (SST) using event‐related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The SST involves a go task and the occasional requirement to stop the go response. We posit that both the go and the stop phases of the SST involve components of inhibition and performance monitoring. The goal of this study was to determine whether inhibition and performance monitoring during go and stop phases of the task activated different networks. We isolated go‐phase activities underlying response withholding, monitoring, and sensorimotor processing and contrasted these with successful inhibition to identify the substrate of response inhibition. Error detection activity was isolated using trials in which a stop signal appeared but the response was executed. These trials were modeled as a hand‐specific go trial followed by error processing. Cognitive go‐phase processes included response withholding and monitoring and activated right prefrontal and midline networks. Response withdrawal additionally activated right inferior frontal gyrus and basal ganglia (caudate). Error detection invoked by failed inhibition activated dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and right middle frontal Brodmann's area 9. Our results confirm that there are distinct aspects of inhibition and performance monitoring functions which come into play at various phases within a given trial of the SST, and that these are separable using fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  R. Schachar,et al.  Neural activity associated with failed inhibition: an event related fMRI study or performance monitoring. , 2004, Brain and cognition.

[2]  K. K. Harnishfeger,et al.  Intending to forget: the development of cognitive inhibition in directed forgetting. , 1996, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[4]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  J. Saint-Cyr,et al.  Behavior and the basal ganglia. , 1995, Advances in neurology.

[6]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  G. Glover,et al.  Self‐navigated spiral fMRI: Interleaved versus single‐shot , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[9]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  Evidence for an Error Monitoring Deficit in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 2004, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[10]  A. Shmuel,et al.  Sustained Negative BOLD, Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption Response and Its Coupling to the Positive Response in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[11]  W. Gehring,et al.  Action-Monitoring Dysfunction in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , 2000, Psychological science.

[12]  D. Tucker,et al.  Medial Frontal Cortex in Action Monitoring , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  D Yves von Cramon,et al.  Interactions of focal cortical lesions with error processing: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2002, Neuropsychology.

[14]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  The Ecological Validity of Delay Aversion and Response Inhibition as Measures of Impulsivity in AD/HD: A Supplement to the NIMH Multimodal Treatment Study of AD/HD , 2001, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[15]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  G. Di Chiara A motivational learning hypothesis of the role of mesolimbic dopamine in compulsive drug use. , 1998, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[17]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  N. Yeung,et al.  On the ERN and the significance of errors. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[20]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Hongtu Zhu,et al.  A developmental fMRI study of self‐regulatory control , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Michael S. Gaffrey,et al.  Activity and functional connectivity of inferior frontal cortex associated with response conflict. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Medial Prefrontal Cortex and Error Potentials , 2002, Science.

[24]  M. Hallett,et al.  The relative metabolic demand of inhibition and excitation , 2000, Nature.

[25]  Laura Busse,et al.  Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Martin P Paulus,et al.  Dissociation of inhibition from error processing using a parametric inhibitory task during functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Neuroreport.

[27]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Prefrontal‐subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event‐related fMRI , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  J. Downar,et al.  A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Learned Predictions of Error Likelihood in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2005, Science.

[30]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[31]  G. Logan,et al.  Development of inhibitory control across the life span. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[32]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[33]  M. Mesulam Frontal cortex and behavior , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[34]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Separating Processes within a Trial in Event-Related Functional MRI II. Analysis , 2001, NeuroImage.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[36]  J. Ford,et al.  Anatomy of an error: ERP and fMRI , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[37]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  The Cognitive Neuroscience of Response Inhibition: Relevance for Genetic Research in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[38]  B. Dubois,et al.  [Cognitive functions and the basal ganglia: the model of Parkinson disease]. , 1994, Revue neurologique.

[39]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[40]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Conceptual Processing during the Conscious Resting State: A Functional MRI Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[42]  Tor D. Wager,et al.  Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[43]  Tomifusa Kuboki,et al.  Error-related negativity reflects detection of negative reward prediction error , 2004, Neuroreport.

[44]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[45]  E. Koechlin,et al.  Medial Prefrontal and Subcortical Mechanisms Underlying the Acquisition of Motor and Cognitive Action Sequences in Humans , 2002, Neuron.

[46]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[47]  G. Bruce Pike,et al.  Hemodynamic and metabolic responses to neuronal inhibition , 2004, NeuroImage.

[48]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Overactive Action Monitoring in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , 2003, Psychological science.

[49]  G. E. Alexander,et al.  Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[50]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration , 1993 .

[51]  F. Vargha-Khadem,et al.  Maturation of action monitoring from adolescence to adulthood: an ERP study. , 2005, Developmental science.

[52]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[53]  D Gounot,et al.  Where arousal meets attention: a simultaneous fMRI and EEG recording study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[54]  G. Logan,et al.  Inhibitory attentional control in patients with frontal lobe damage , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[55]  J. Hollerman,et al.  Reward processing in primate orbitofrontal cortex and basal ganglia. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  G. Band,et al.  Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[57]  M. Rieger,et al.  Inhibition of ongoing responses in patients with Parkinson’s disease , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[58]  M. Rieger,et al.  Inhibition of ongoing responses following frontal, nonfrontal, and basal ganglia lesions. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[59]  J. Binder,et al.  A Parametric Manipulation of Factors Affecting Task-induced Deactivation in Functional Neuroimaging , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  R. Knight,et al.  Anatomical substrates of auditory selective attention: behavioral and electrophysiological effects of posterior association cortex lesions. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[61]  M. W. Molen,et al.  A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[62]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Action monitoring, error detection, and the basal ganglia: an ERP study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[63]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition of subliminally primed responses is mediated by the caudate and thalamus: evidence from functional MRI and Huntington's disease. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[64]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Negative functional MRI response correlates with decreases in neuronal activity in monkey visual area V1 , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[65]  T Shallice,et al.  The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[66]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Brain potentials related to self-generated and external information used for performance monitoring , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[67]  G. Winocur,et al.  “I have often walked down this street before”: fMRI Studies on the hippocampus and other structures during mental navigation of an old environment , 2004, Hippocampus.

[68]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[69]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Separating Processes within a Trial in Event-Related Functional MRI I. The Method , 2001, NeuroImage.

[70]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Stochastic Designs in Event-Related fMRI , 1999, NeuroImage.

[71]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[72]  D. Tucker,et al.  Electrophysiological Responses to Errors and Feedback in the Process of Action Regulation , 2003, Psychological science.

[73]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  Katya Rubia,et al.  Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[75]  G D Logan,et al.  Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[76]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[77]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[78]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task , 1993, Biological Psychology.

[79]  R. T. Constable,et al.  Neural correlates of temporal-order judgments versus those of spatial-location: Deactivation of hippocampus may facilitate spatial performance , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[80]  R. Malach,et al.  Negative BOLD Differentiates Visual Imagery and Perception , 2005, Neuron.

[81]  Peter Praamstra,et al.  The basal ganglia and inhibitory mechanisms in response selection: evidence from subliminal priming of motor responses in Parkinson's disease. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[82]  A. Kok Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks , 1986, Biological Psychology.

[83]  B. Pennington,et al.  Validity of the Executive Function Theory of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[84]  W. Gehring,et al.  Functions of the Medial Frontal Cortex in the Processing of Conflict and Errors , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[85]  R. Kahn,et al.  Function of striatum beyond inhibition and execution of motor responses , 2005, Human brain mapping.