Altmetrics, alternative indicators for Web of Science Communication studies journals

The aim of this study is to analyse the occurrence of communication journals in the so-called Altmetrics (Facebook, Mendeley, Twitter, etc.) and how these indicators relate to each other and to the citations received. To this end, we study how the articles published by the Journal Citation Reports of the Web of Science for the 5-year period 2013–2017 on the Altmetric.com platform are registered. The results show how only a few platforms have significant coverage for studying the whole and in the case of Mendeley and Twitter, the coverage is superior to the citations offered by Web of Science. There is a proven relationship between citations and their occurrence on social media and platforms and their intensity varies by product. In general, the journals with the highest number of citations (Journal of Computer Mediated, Journal of Communication or New Media & Society) with few exceptions (Continuum) stand out.

[1]  Gonzalo Casino.  Cita periodística: impacto de las revistas y los artículos científicos en la prensa generalista , 2018, El Profesional de la Informacion.

[2]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management , 2015 .

[3]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  Theories in communication science: a structural analysis using webometrics and social network approach , 2015, Scientometrics.

[4]  Louis Leung,et al.  A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication journals from 2006 to 2011 , 2015, New Media Soc..

[5]  Rafael Repiso,et al.  Universidades españolas en la prensa extranjera. Análisis de su cobertura periodística , 2018 .

[6]  What people study when they study , 2022 .

[7]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Publications Saved by Mendeley Users: Is There Any Different Pattern Among Users? , 2014 .

[8]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated “bot” accounts on Twitter , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  The ecstasy and the agony of the altmetric score , 2016, Scientometrics.

[10]  Richard D. Waters,et al.  Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook , 2009 .

[11]  Léa Velho,et al.  The “meaning” of citation in the context of a scientifically peripheral country , 2005, Scientometrics.

[12]  James Wilsdon.  The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management , 2016 .

[13]  Oliver Quiring,et al.  What Interactivity Means to the User Essential Insights into and a Scale for Perceived Interactivity , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Web visibility of scholars in media and communication journals , 2012, Scientometrics.

[15]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Altmetrics as traces of the computerization of the research process , 2015, ArXiv.

[16]  José Luis Ortega,et al.  The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) , 2017, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[17]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Cómo identificar una revista de calidad , 2015 .

[19]  Marc de Mey.  The cognitive paradigm : an integrated understanding of scientific development , 1992 .

[20]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[21]  Jane Cho.  A comparative study of the impact of Korean research articles in four academic fields using altmetrics , 2017 .

[22]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Are Mendeley reader counts useful impact indicators in all fields? , 2017, Scientometrics.

[23]  Kate E Decleene,et al.  Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association , 2011 .

[24]  Francisco Segado Boj.  ¿Revistas 2.0? Revistas científicas españolas del área de Comunicación en las redes sociales , 2013 .

[25]  F. Galligan,et al.  Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure , 2013 .

[26]  Daniel Torres-Salinas,et al.  Altmetrics: nuevos indicadores para la comunicación científica en la Web 2.0 , 2013 .

[27]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications , 2014, Scientometrics.

[28]  Kaye D. Sweetser,et al.  PR practitioners’ use of social media tools and communication technology , 2008 .

[29]  Shenmeng Xu,et al.  Global science discussed in local altmetrics: Weibo and its comparison with Twitter , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[30]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Research evaluation of Asian countries using altmetrics: comparing South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, and China , 2018, Scientometrics.

[31]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services , 2013, PloS one.

[32]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Knowledge linkage structures in communication studies using citation analysis among communication journals , 2009, Scientometrics.

[33]  Chris Hankin,et al.  Ranking Twitter Influence by Combining Network Centrality and Influence Observables in an Evolutionary Model , 2013, SITIS.

[34]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  Uncovering impacts: a case study in using altmetrics tools , 2013, SePublica@ESWC.

[35]  Barry W. Brook,et al.  Climate-Induced Elevational Range Shifts and Increase in Plant Species Richness in a Himalayan Biodiversity Epicentre , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  Emilio Delgado López-Cózar,et al.  Thomson Reuters utiliza altmétricas: usage counts para los artículos indizados en la Web of Science , 2016 .

[37]  Remedios Melero,et al.  Altmetrics – a complement to conventional metrics , 2015, Biochemia medica.

[38]  Tom Kelleher,et al.  Social media use, perceptions of decision-making power, and public relations roles , 2009 .

[39]  GorraizJuan,et al.  The ecstasy and the agony of the altmetric score , 2016 .

[40]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The delineation of an interdisciplinary specialty in terms of a journal set: The case of communication studies , 2009 .

[41]  Dan Murray,et al.  Tableau Your Data!: Fast and Easy Visual Analysis with Tableau Software , 2013 .

[42]  Shirley Williams,et al.  What do people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papers , 2013, J. Documentation.

[43]  E. Lauf,et al.  National diversity of major international journals in the field of communication , 2005 .

[44]  J. Gastwirth.  The Estimation of the Lorenz Curve and Gini Index , 1972 .

[45]  W. Torgerson.  Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method , 1952 .

[46]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[47]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[48]  Nicolás Robinson-García,et al.  New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of Altmetric.com , 2014, ArXiv.

[49]  Han Woo Park,et al.  An altmetric investigation of the online visibility of South Korea-based scientific journals , 2018, Scientometrics.

[50]  Marc Langston,et al.  Linking to journal articles in an online teaching environment: The persistent link, DOI, and OpenURL , 2004 .