Analysis of behind the armor ballistic trauma.

The impact response of body armor composed of a ceramic plate with an ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber-reinforced composite and layers of UHMWPE fibers shielding a block of ballistic gelatin has been experimentally and numerically analyzed. It is a surrogate model for studying injuries to human torso caused by a bullet striking body protection armor placed on a person. Photographs taken with a high speed camera are used to determine deformations of the armor and the gelatin. The maximum depth of the temporary cavity formed in the ballistic gelatin and the peak pressure 40mm behind the center of the gelatin front face contacting the armor are found to be, respectively, ~34mm and ~15MPa. The Johnson-Holmquist material model has been used to simulate deformations and failure of the ceramic. The UHMWPE fiber-reinforced composite and the UHMWPE fiber layers are modeled as linear elastic orthotropic materials. The gelatin is modeled as a strain-rate dependent hyperelastic material. Values of material parameters are taken from the open literature. The computed evolution of the temporary cavity formed in the gelatin is found to qualitatively agree with that seen in experiments. Furthermore, the computed time histories of the average pressure at four points in the gelatin agree with the corresponding experimentally measured ones. The maximum pressure at a point and the depth of the temporary cavity formed in the gelatin can be taken as measures of the severity of the bodily injury caused by the impact; e.g. see the United States National Institute of Justice standard 0101.06-Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor.

[1]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Numerical simulation of impact tests on GFRP composite laminates , 2011 .

[2]  L Cannon,et al.  Behind Armour Blunt Trauma - an emerging problem , 2001, Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps.

[3]  L. Iannucci,et al.  High velocity impact and armour design , 2011 .

[4]  M. Philippens,et al.  Physics of IED Blast Shock Tube Simulations for mTBI Research , 2011, Front. Neur..

[5]  V. Sánchez Gálvez,et al.  Dynamic tensile testing of aramid and polyethylene fiber composites , 1997 .

[6]  Richard Bibb,et al.  Design of human surrogates for the study of biomechanical injury: a review. , 2013, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[7]  D. Cronin,et al.  Implementation and Validation of the Johnson-Holmquist Ceramic Material Model in LS-Dyna , 2003 .

[8]  Mica Grujicic,et al.  Material Modeling and Ballistic-Resistance Analysis of Armor-Grade Composites Reinforced with High-Performance Fibers , 2009, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[9]  B. D. H. Utomo,et al.  High-speed Impact Modelling and Testing of Dyneema Composite , 2011 .

[10]  Duane S. Cronin,et al.  Ballistic impact response of laminated composite panels , 2008 .

[11]  E. E. Ward,et al.  Assessing behind armor blunt trauma in accordance with the National Institute of Justice Standard for Personal Body Armor Protection using finite element modeling. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials , 2008 .

[13]  Vassilis Kostopoulos,et al.  Blast response of metal composite laminate fuselage structures using finite element modelling , 2011 .

[14]  E. E. Ward,et al.  Modeling the effect of non-penetrating ballistic impact as a means of detecting behind armor blunt trauma. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[15]  R. Batra,et al.  Constitutive equations for thermomechanical deformations of glassy polymers , 2009 .

[16]  J.L.M.J. van Bree,et al.  The twin peaks of BABT , 2000 .

[17]  J.L.M.J. van Bree,et al.  Compression wave experimental and numerical studies in gelatine behind armour , 1999 .

[18]  Jose Sinibaldi,et al.  Advanced layered personnel armor , 2011 .

[19]  Salah Naili,et al.  Finite element study of high-speed blunt impact on thorax: linear elastic considerations , 2004 .

[20]  D. Cronin,et al.  High Rate Characterization of Low Impedance Materials Using a Polymeric Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar , 2006 .

[21]  N. Prat,et al.  Comparison of thoracic wall behavior in large animals and human cadavers submitted to an identical ballistic blunt thoracic trauma. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[22]  V. Tan,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of UHMWPE yarns and addressing impedance mismatch effects of specimen clamps , 2010 .

[23]  Jing Chen,et al.  Intracranial Pressure Response to Non-Penetrating Ballistic Impact: An Experimental Study Using a Pig Physical Head Model and Live Pigs , 2012, International journal of medical sciences.

[24]  Francisco Cristóvão Lourenço de Melo,et al.  Ballistic impact simulation of an armour-piercing projectile on hybrid ceramic/fiber reinforced composite armours , 2012 .

[25]  Jorma Jussila,et al.  Preparing ballistic gelatine--review and proposal for a standard method. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[26]  P. Umberger Characterization and Response of Thermoplastic Composites and Constituents , 2010 .

[27]  Subramani Sockalingam,et al.  Numerical simulation of ceramic composite armor subjected to ballistic impact , 2010 .

[28]  Mica Grujicic,et al.  A ballistic material model for cross-plied unidirectional ultra-high molecular-weight polyethylene fiber-reinforced armor-grade composites , 2008 .

[29]  M. Meyers Dynamic Behavior of Materials , 1994 .

[30]  R. Batra,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of low-velocity impact response of laminated plates , 2015 .

[31]  D. S. Cronin,et al.  Ballistic Gelatin Characterization and Constitutive Modeling , 2011 .