A comparison of the normalized detection threshold for the overlapped and non-overlapped FFT summation detectors

A specified probability of false alarm can be obtained for the FFT summation detector by setting the detection threshold as the product of the channel noise floor and the normalized detection threshold Tn. The channel noise floor is often adaptively estimated from the FFT filter bank output and Tn is mostly computed by solving a non-linear equation, which can be reliably accomplished when, L, the number of input data blocks, and, N, the number of FFT bins assigned to a channel, are both relatively small. However, when L or N is large, numerical procedures often break down, yielding invalid results. This paper provides new theoretical results concerning the computation of Tn. Using two inequalities involving positively weighted sums of central χ2 random variables, it is shown that the Tn for overlapped input data with an overlap ratio not exceeding 50% is larger than the Tn for non-overlapped input data, assuming that the same number of input data blocks is processed by the FFT. This inequality can be used as a first level of sanity check when verifying results obtained by procedures such as the Newton-Ralphson and the golden section search algorithms.

[1]  M. F. Garyantes,et al.  A 640 MHz 32 megachannel real-time polyphase-FFT spectrum analyzer , 1991, [1991] Conference Record of the Twenty-Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers.

[2]  Robert Inkol,et al.  Threshold computation for the summation CFAR detector: non-overlapped versus overlapped FFT processing , 2007 .

[3]  Peter D. Welch,et al.  The Fast Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1969 .

[4]  D. Boudreau,et al.  A fast automatic modulation recognition algorithm and its implementation in a spectrum monitoring application , 2000, MILCOM 2000 Proceedings. 21st Century Military Communications. Architectures and Technologies for Information Superiority (Cat. No.00CH37155).

[5]  Behrouz Farhang-Boroujeny,et al.  Filter Bank Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radios , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  M. M. Siddiqui,et al.  An upper bound for the distribution function of a positive definite quadratic form , 2001 .

[7]  J. Grajal,et al.  Digital channelized receiver based on time-frequency analysis for signal interception , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[8]  Masashi Okamoto,et al.  An Inequality for the Weighted Sum of $ x^2 $ Variates , 1960 .

[9]  Filippo Attivissimo,et al.  FFT test of A/D converters to determine the integral nonlinearity , 2002, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[10]  Robert J. Inkol,et al.  Upper and Lower Bounds for the Threshold of the FFT Filter Bank-Based Summation CFAR Detector , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[11]  Robert J. Inkol,et al.  Computation of the Normalized Detection Threshold for the FFT Filter Bank-Based Summation CFAR Detector , 2007, J. Comput..

[12]  Robert J. Inkol,et al.  Numerical computation of the normalized detection threshold for the FFT J-out-of-L detector , 2009, 2009 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[13]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  Robert J. Inkol,et al.  The Okamoto lower bound for the normalized detection threshold of the FFT filter bank-based summation detector , 2010, CCECE 2010.