Measuring R&D Spillovers: On the Importance of Geographic and Technological Proximity

Evidence is presented which suggest that an important measure of the apparent geographic localization of R&D spillovers may be an artifact of industrial agglomeration. A production function framework is used to examine the role of geographic and technological proximity for inter-firm spillovers from R&D. The largest spillovers are found to flow between firms in the same industry. However, spillovers within narrowly defined technological groups do not appear to be attenuated by distance. Geographic proximity does appear to attenuate spillovers that cross narrowly defined technological boundaries, suggesting these spillovers may play a role in the agglomeration of a diversity of industrial activity.

[1]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between R&D and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms , 1992 .

[2]  Henry G. Grabowski,et al.  The Determinants of Industrial Research and Development: A Study of the Chemical, Drug, and Petroleum Industries , 1968, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents and R and D at the Firm Level: A First Look , 1980 .

[4]  Michael J. Orlando.  On the Importance of Geographic and Technological Proximity for R&D Spillovers: An Empirical Investigation , 2000 .

[5]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  The effects of double-counting and expensing on the measured returns to r&d , 1981 .

[6]  A. Pakes,et al.  Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look , 1984 .

[7]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[8]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[9]  L. Summers,et al.  Tax Reform and Corporate Investment: A Microeconometric Simulation Study , 1981 .

[10]  Andrew P. Meyer,et al.  How responsive is business capital formation to its user cost?: An exploration with micro data , 1999 .

[11]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. , 1996, The Rand journal of economics.

[12]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations , 1998 .

[13]  M. Feldman,et al.  Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition , 1999 .

[14]  Susanto Basu,et al.  Procyclical Productivity: Increasing Returns or Cyclical Utilization? , 1995 .

[15]  Research and Development in Industry , 1960, Nature.

[16]  James D. Adams,et al.  Bounding the Effects of R&D an Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data , 1996 .

[17]  Susanto Basu,et al.  Appropriate Technology and Growth , 1996 .

[18]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[19]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Estimating the productivity of research and development , 1996 .

[20]  Gavin Cameron,et al.  Innovation and economic growth , 1996 .

[21]  Leo Sveikauskas,et al.  The Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth. , 1986 .

[22]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.