Methodological interculturalism: breaking down epistemological barriers around diversity management

ABSTRACT As part of the post-multicultural era, transnationalism, super-diversity, cosmopolitanism and solidarity develop a sense of awareness to live in a complex society. This requests us to identify the epistemological barriers preventing us to produce new knowledge, since there is a raising consciousness that these new frameworks cannot be addressed with old policy maps. All share the need to go beyond methodological nationalism, and one of its by-products: multiculturalism. Methodological interculturalism is a promising epistemological lens through which to cluster this new diversity geography. It is a direct answer to the key question, what happens when the unit of analysis from which we argue about “how to live together” is diversity itself rather than a supposed us/we/unity/ majority/state/nation lens. The outcome is the recognition that super-diversity and transnationalism is a fact that we need to incorporate into our public culture, together with new normative claims of justice related to cosmopolitanism and solidarity.

[1]  Tina Magazzini Making the Most of Superdiversity: Notes on the Potential of a New Approach , 2017, Superdiversity, Policy and Governance in Europe.

[2]  S. Vertovec Super-diversity and its implications , 2007, Celebrating 40 Years of Ethnic and Racial Studies.

[3]  R. Zapata‐Barrero Rejoinder: multiculturalism and interculturalism: alongside but separate , 2018, Comparative Migration Studies.

[4]  P. Loobuyck,et al.  Introduction: mapping the multiculturalism-interculturalism debate , 2018, Comparative Migration Studies.

[5]  T. Modood,et al.  A plural century: Situating interculturalism and multiculturalism , 2018 .

[6]  R. Zapata‐Barrero Transnationalism and Interculturalism: Overlapping Affinities , 2018 .

[7]  T. Modood Must Interculturalists misrepresent multiculturalism? , 2017, Comparative Migration Studies.

[8]  R. Zapata-Barrero,et al.  Interculturalism in the post-multicultural debate: a defence , 2017, Comparative Migration Studies.

[9]  T. Modood,et al.  Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: debating the dividing lines , 2016 .

[10]  T. Modood,et al.  Multiculturalism and Interculturalism , 2016 .

[11]  W. Kymlicka,et al.  The political sources of solidarity in diverse societies , 2015 .

[12]  F. Meissner,et al.  Comparing super-diversity , 2015 .

[13]  P. Boccagni (Super)diversity and the migration–social work nexus: a new lens on the field of access and inclusion? , 2015 .

[14]  R. Zapata‐Barrero Interculturalism in Cities , 2015 .

[15]  N. Schiller,et al.  Whose Cosmopolitanism?: Critical Perspectives, Relationalities and Discontents , 2015 .

[16]  Daniel Jendrissek Transnational Migration , 2013 .

[17]  W. Kymlicka,et al.  Is there really a retreat from multiculturalism policies? New evidence from the multiculturalism policy index , 2013 .

[18]  Ted Cantle Interculturalism: The New Era of Cohesion and Diversity , 2012 .

[19]  T. Modood,et al.  ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES , 2011 .

[20]  P. Levitt,et al.  Transnational Migration Studies: Past Developments and Future Trends , 2007 .

[21]  W. Kymlicka,et al.  Multiculturalism and the Welfare State , 2006 .

[22]  U. Beck,et al.  Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences : a research agenda , 2006 .

[23]  Will Kymlicka,et al.  Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies , 2006 .

[24]  S. Castles Towards a Sociology of Forced Migration and Social Transformation , 2003 .

[25]  R. Cohen,et al.  Conceiving cosmopolitanism : theory, context and practice , 2002 .

[26]  J. Waldron,et al.  What is Cosmopolitan , 2000 .