Sequential memory: Binding dynamics.

Temporal order memories are critical for everyday animal and human functioning. Experiments and our own experience show that the binding or association of various features of an event together and the maintaining of multimodality events in sequential order are the key components of any sequential memories-episodic, semantic, working, etc. We study a robustness of binding sequential dynamics based on our previously introduced model in the form of generalized Lotka-Volterra equations. In the phase space of the model, there exists a multi-dimensional binding heteroclinic network consisting of saddle equilibrium points and heteroclinic trajectories joining them. We prove here the robustness of the binding sequential dynamics, i.e., the feasibility phenomenon for coupled heteroclinic networks: for each collection of successive heteroclinic trajectories inside the unified networks, there is an open set of initial points such that the trajectory going through each of them follows the prescribed collection staying in a small neighborhood of it. We show also that the symbolic complexity function of the system restricted to this neighborhood is a polynomial of degree L - 1, where L is the number of modalities.

[1]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The Episodic Memory System: Neurocircuitry and Disorders , 2010, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[2]  Robert Kozma,et al.  Robust sequential working memory recall in heterogeneous cognitive networks , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[3]  R. May,et al.  Nonlinear Aspects of Competition Between Three Species , 1975 .

[4]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[5]  Jamie D. Feusner,et al.  Computational non-linear dynamical psychiatry: a new methodological paradigm for diagnosis and course of illness. , 2012, Journal of psychiatric research.

[6]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  Using large-scale neural models to interpret connectivity measures of cortico-cortical dynamics at millisecond temporal resolution , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[7]  Ramón Huerta,et al.  Dynamical encoding by networks of competing neuron groups: winnerless competition. , 2001 .

[8]  C. Bockting,et al.  Network destabilization and transition in depression: New methods for studying the dynamics of therapeutic change. , 2015, Clinical psychology review.

[9]  Danielle F. P. Toupo,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of the rock-paper-scissors game with mutations. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Christian Bick,et al.  Dynamical origin of the effective storage capacity in the brain's working memory. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[11]  Durk Talsma,et al.  A multisensory perspective of working memory , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  Albert R. Powers,et al.  Perceptual Training Narrows the Temporal Window of Multisensory Binding , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Multiple limit cycles for three dimensional Lotka-Volterra equations , 1994 .

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Principal component analysis learning algorithms: a neurobiological analysis , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  J. Sprott,et al.  Chaos in low-dimensional Lotka–Volterra models of competition , 2006 .

[16]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Discontinuous Patterns of Brain Activation in the Psychotherapy Process of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Converging Results from Repeated fMRI and Daily Self-Reports , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  J. V. Haxby,et al.  Spatial Pattern Analysis of Functional Brain Images Using Partial Least Squares , 1996, NeuroImage.

[18]  S Makeig,et al.  Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  D. Talsma Predictive coding and multisensory integration: an attentional account of the multisensory mind , 2015, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[20]  Mara Mather,et al.  Effects of emotional arousal on memory binding in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. , 2011, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  M. Just,et al.  Collaborative Activity between Parietal and Dorso-Lateral Prefrontal Cortex in Dynamic Spatial Working Memory Revealed by fMRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[22]  D. Cheyne,et al.  Dynamic cortical activity in the human brain reveals motor equivalence , 1998, Nature.

[23]  M. Wallace,et al.  The construct of the multisensory temporal binding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  M. Gilpin Limit Cycles in Competition Communities , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[25]  Morgan D. Barense,et al.  The impact of multisensory integration deficits on speech perception in children with autism spectrum disorders , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[26]  A. Selverston,et al.  Dynamical principles in neuroscience , 2006 .

[27]  R Huerta,et al.  Dynamical encoding by networks of competing neuron groups: winnerless competition. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[28]  Pablo Varona,et al.  Neural Dynamics of Attentional Cross-Modality Control , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  Pablo Varona,et al.  Dynamical bridge between brain and mind , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Ramón Huerta,et al.  Transient Cognitive Dynamics, Metastability, and Decision Making , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  S. Edelman,et al.  The problem of multimodal concurrent serial order in behavior , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.