Minimum Data Needed on Patient Preferences for Accurate, Efficient Medical Decision Making

Involving patients in their health care decisions improves patient satisfaction and outcomes, but can be costly because of the materials and time needed to discuss the many issues that constitute a medical problem. The authors present a framework for identifying the minimum data needed on patient preferences for accurate medical decision making. The method is illustrated for the decision of whether patients with end-stage renal disease should undergo short or long hemodialysis treatments. The value of health states to patients was modeled as a function of six outcomes: survival, uremic symptoms, hospital days per year, the inconvenience associated with long dialysis treatment duration, presence of hypotension during dialysis, and presence of other symptoms during dialysis. The relative importance of each outcome was characterized in a value function by weights referred to as preference-scaling factors. These factors were varied at random over a uniform distribution to simulate different patterns of patient preferences on the six outcomes. The decision model's recommendation was recorded for each simulation. Classification and regression-tree (CART) and stepwise logistic regression analyses were applied to these recommendations to determine the scaling-factor levels that predict short or long treatments. Knowledge of scaling factors on only the inconvenience of long dialysis treatment duration, the worst alive state of health on hemodialysis, and presence of hypotension identified the correct treatment in more than 97% of simulations. Fifty-five patients undergoing hemodialysis were then surveyed for their scaling factors on the six dimensions of well-being. When patients' scaling factors were applied to the predictive rule generated by CART using simulated scaling factors, more than 94% of treatment decisions were classified correctly—sensitivity and specificity of predicting long dialysis were 89% and 100%, respectively. These statistical techniques applied to results of a decision model help identify the minimum data needed on patient preferences to involve patients in efficient and accurate decisions about their health care.

[1]  S. Greenfield,et al.  Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. , 1992, Medical care.

[2]  Lawrence M. Fagan,et al.  Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care , 1991 .

[3]  A. Stewart,et al.  Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. , 1989, JAMA.

[4]  E. Shortliffe Clinical decision-support systems , 1990 .

[5]  A. Dobson,et al.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-index for use by physicians. , 1981, Journal of chronic diseases.

[6]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[7]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  W. Bunch,et al.  Patient preferences in surgery for scoliosis. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  B. Korsch,et al.  Gaps in doctor-patient communication. Patients' response to medical advice. , 1969, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  A. Mulley,et al.  Developing shared decision-making programs to improve the quality of health care. , 1992, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[11]  S. Addelman Orthogonal Main-Effect Plans for Asymmetrical Factorial Experiments , 1962 .

[12]  P. Fishburn Methods of Estimating Additive Utilities , 1967 .

[13]  A Steptoe,et al.  Satisfaction with communication, medical knowledge, and coping style in patients with metastatic cancer. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[14]  L. Moses,et al.  Statistical approaches to classification. Methods for developing classification and other criteria rules. , 2010, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[15]  A Maas,et al.  Assessing Utilities by Means of Conjoint Measurement , 1992, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[16]  J. Wennberg,et al.  Outcomes research, cost containment, and the fear of health care rationing. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Holly Jimison A Representation for gaining insight into clinical decision models , 1990 .

[18]  A. Stewart,et al.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. , 1988, Medical care.

[19]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[20]  M. Barry,et al.  Watchful waiting vs immediate transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatism. The importance of patients' preferences. , 1988, JAMA.

[21]  T. Delbanco,et al.  Enriching the Doctor-Patient Relationship by Inviting the Patient's Perspective , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  H. Sox,et al.  Psychologically mediated effects of diagnostic tests. , 1981, Annals of internal medicine.

[23]  J. Hornberger The hemodialysis prescription and quality-adjusted life expectancy. Renal Physicians Association Working Committee on Clinical Guidelines. , 1993, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[24]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[25]  W. McClellan,et al.  Functional status and quality of life: predictors of early mortality among patients entering treatment for end stage renal disease. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  J. Hornberger,et al.  The hemodialysis prescription and cost effectiveness. Renal Physicians Association Working Committee on Clinical Guidelines. , 1993, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[27]  E. Blanchard,et al.  Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. , 1988, Social science & medicine.

[28]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .