Visual Search for Land Use Objects in Aerial Photographs

Although visual search has been a topic of interest for some time, most search processes have considered simple target symbols in a plain background. The purpose of the current study was to consider more realistic search processes that involved complex targets and backgrounds. A cognitive experiment was conducted in which subjects searched for specific types of land use in aerial photographs. Subjects were presented displays with simple or complex backgrounds that had from one to five primary and secondary objects related to four different types of land use. Primary objects were stores, schools, churches, and farmhouses; secondary objects included parking lots, athletic fields, cemeteries, and agricultural fields. Subjects searched each photograph and determined if the stated target was present or absent. The efficiency of the visual search was measured by reaction time. Reaction times significantly decreased as the number of objects in the photograph increased. The separation of primary and secondary land-use objects significantly increased reaction times. Searches done with complex backgrounds were significantly longer than searches done with simple backgrounds. Visual searches were significantly faster when schools and churches were targets in the photographs and significantly slower when stores and farmhouses were targets.

[1]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  Visual Categorization with Aerial Photographs , 2002 .

[2]  C. Frith,et al.  Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  P. Malinowski,et al.  The effect of familiarity on visual-search performance: Evidence for learned basic features , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  E. Reingold,et al.  Visual search asymmetry: The influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  P. Malinowski,et al.  How to produce an absent-advantage in visual search , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual cueing of visual attention , 2022 .

[7]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[8]  Robert Lloyd,et al.  Visual Search Processes Used in Map Reading , 1997 .

[9]  David K. Patton,et al.  The Effects of Prior Knowledge on the Learning of Categories of Maps , 1997 .

[10]  Elisabeth S. Nelson Colour Detection on Bivariate Choropleth Maps: The Visual Search Process , 1994 .

[11]  Robert Lloyd,et al.  Learning Spatial Prototypes , 1994 .

[12]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Familiarity and pop-out in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Clifford H. Wood VISUAL SEARCH CENTRALITY AND MINIMUM MAP SIZE , 1993 .

[15]  H E Egeth,et al.  Response time and accuracy revisited: converging support for the interactive race model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[23]  G. Foody Monitoring the magnitude of land-cover change around the southern limits of the Sahara , 2001 .

[24]  R. Lloyd Searching for Map Symbols: The Cognitive Processes , 1988 .