Soft Tissue Artifact compensation using Triangular Cosserat Point Elements (TCPEs)

Abstract Existing methods which compensate for the Soft Tissue Artifact (STA) in optoelectronic motion measurements estimate the rigid motion of a nearly rigid underlying body segment based on analysis of the motion of all fiducial markers. The objective of the proposed Triangular Cosserat Point Elements (TCPE) method is to estimate the motion of the underlying body segment even when the STA in the entire cluster of markers can be large. This is accomplished by characterizing the cluster of markers with TCPEs defined by triangles based on all combinations of three markers. Then, scalar deformation measures characterizing the magnitudes of strain and relative rotation of pairs of TCPEs are defined for each TCPE. These deformation measures are used to define a filtered group of TCPEs which best represents the motion of the underlying body segment. The method was tested using an experimental setup that consists of a rigid pendulum with a deformable 300 ml silicone breast implant attached to it as a simulation of the soft tissue around a bony segment. The rotation angles extracted from markers on the deformable implant were compared with simultaneous measurements of the rigid pendulum using an optoelectronic system. Analysis of the experimental data shows that this filtering process substantially reduces the error due to the STA even though the data set includes large deformations. In particular, the analysis shows that the error reduction using the TCPE approach is larger than the reductions obtained using standard least-squares minimization methods.

[1]  H J Sommer,et al.  Three-dimensional osteometric scaling and normative modelling of skeletal segments. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  M. Rubin On the Theory of a Cosserat Point and Its Application to the Numerical Solution of Continuum Problems , 1985 .

[3]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: applied to a study of knee kinematics. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  B. Fregly,et al.  A solidification procedure to facilitate kinematic analyses based on video system data. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  R Dumas,et al.  Soft tissue artifact compensation by linear 3D interpolation and approximation methods. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Alon Wolf,et al.  Using Cosserat Point Theory for Estimating Kinematics and Soft-Tissue Deformation During Gait Analysis , 2010 .

[7]  M. B. Rubin,et al.  A simplified implicit Newmark integration scheme for finite rotations , 2007, Comput. Math. Appl..

[8]  Kevin Ball,et al.  Modeling of the pliant surfaces of the thigh and leg during gait , 1998, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[9]  Kumbakonam R. Rajagopal,et al.  Fidelity of the estimation of the deformation gradient from data deduced from the motion of markers placed on a body that is subject to an inhomogeneous deformation field. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  E.,et al.  A least-squares algorithm for the equiform transformation from spatial marker co-ordinates. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  J. Challis A procedure for determining rigid body transformation parameters. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  Pj Udoh,et al.  Rigid Body Motion Calculated From Spatial Co-ordinates of Markers , 2010 .

[14]  L. E. Malvern Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium , 1969 .

[15]  I Söderkvist,et al.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  Reconstruction of skeletal movement using skin markers: comparative assessment of bone pose estimators , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  M. Rubin,et al.  Arithmetic and geometric solutions for average rigid-body rotation , 2010 .