SIMULATION ANALYSIS FOR UAV SEARCH ALGORITHM DESIGN USING APPROXIMATE DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING

Many decision-and-control algorithms have been proposed for autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The nature of this problem, with large decision spaces and the desire for optimal performance criteria, indicates that closed-form analysis of any approach is nearly impossible, suggesting a simulationbased performance evaluation of relevant scenarios. However, while effective simulation practices have been developed in the operations-research community, awareness of them in the decision-and-control community may be lower than desired for routine application. If applied correctly, these simulation techniques could have a major impact on the quality and effectiveness of UAV algorithms. This paper provides a concrete example that demonstrates that the marriage of UAV decision-andcontrol algorithms with proper simulation techniques can be done effectively and with great benefits for the UAV algorithm researcher, both in terms of the validity and quality of simulation results. The example used in this case is a study conducted for a stochastic UAV algorithm design. In particular, the study is to find the “optimal” sensitivity of a “future-gain” factor that attempts to balance future and present gains in a stochastic-approximate dynamic-programming solution to the problem faced by a team of UAVs searching in an uncertain environment for targets. This work can serve as a template for similar simulation experiments in this area. Experimental motivation and demonstration of the results are given.

[1]  Matthew Flint COOPERATIVE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) SEARCH IN DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS USING STOCHASTIC METHODS , 2005 .

[2]  Marios M. Polycarpou,et al.  Stochastic Models of a Cooperative Autonomous UAV Search Problem , 2003 .

[3]  William B. Carlton,et al.  Dynamic Routing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Reactive Tabu Search , 2001 .

[4]  Jonathan P. How,et al.  COORDINATION AND CONTROL OF MULTIPLE UAVs , 2002 .

[5]  D.A. Castanon,et al.  Distributed algorithms for dynamic reassignment , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[6]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[7]  M. Flint,et al.  Efficient Bayesian methods for updating and storing uncertain search information for UAVs , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[8]  Marios M. Polycarpou,et al.  Cooperative real-time search and task allocation in UAV teams , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[9]  E. Fernandez-Gaucherand,et al.  Cooperative control for multiple autonomous UAV's searching for targets , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[10]  E. Fernandez-Gaucherand,et al.  Cooperative control for UAV's searching risky environments for targets , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[11]  M. Polycarpou,et al.  A Probabilistic Framework for Passive Cooperation Among UAV’s Performing a Search , 2004 .

[12]  Lee W. Schruben,et al.  Simulation modeling for analysis , 2010, TOMC.

[13]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[14]  Matthew Flint,et al.  APPROXIMATE DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING METHODS FOR COOPERATIVE UAV SEARCH , 2005 .

[15]  Christos G. Cassandras,et al.  A receding horizon approach for solving some cooperative control problems , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[16]  Joao P. Hespanha,et al.  E cient Computation of Dynamic Probabilistic Maps , 2002 .

[17]  Pierre L'Ecuyer,et al.  An Object-Oriented Random-Number Package with Many Long Streams and Substreams , 2002, Oper. Res..