Is a Relevant Piece of Information a Valid One? Teaching Critical Evaluation of Online Information

In this chapter we first point out the importance for any user to keep in mind the level of validity of a piece of information; specifically in the context of the Web in which the information is heterogeneous in terms of the editorial process used. We detail the criteria coming from users’ behavior and those that should be taught in order to provide users with an opportunity to become information literate. We suggest a taxonomy of criteria and concepts that can be taught. We present three different ways for a trainer to make trainees learn about information validity: first making students aware of the validity issue, then using a criteria grid and finally teaching based on practice. We finish the chapter with assessments and feedback on these practices.

[1]  M. Mcluhan.  Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man , 1964 .

[2]  Bruno Latour,et al.  La science telle qu'elle se fait : anthologie de la sociologie des sciences de langue anglaise , 1991 .

[3]  P. Candy.  Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education , 1994 .

[4]  J. Piette.  Éducation aux médias et fonction critique , 1996 .

[5]  Stefano Mizzaro,et al.  How many relevances in information retrieval? , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[6]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Understanding Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority in the WWW , 1998 .

[7]  Carol L. Barry,et al.  Users' Criteria for Relevance Evaluation: A Cross-situational Comparison , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..

[8]  D. Maingueneau.  Analyser les textes de communication , 1999 .

[9]  Mary Ann Fitgerald.  Evaluating Information: An Information Literacy Challenge. , 1999 .

[10]  Sandra G. Hirsh.  Children's Relevance Criteria and Information Seeking on Electronic Resources , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Patricia A Iannuzzi.  Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education , 2000 .

[12]  Sarah K. Brem,et al.  Science on the Web: Student Evaluations of Scientific Arguments , 2001 .

[13]  Sarah K. Brem,et al.  Science on the Web: Student Evaluations of Scientific Arguments , 2001 .

[14]  Deborah J. Grimes,et al.  Worries with the Web: A Look at Student Use of Web Resources , 2001 .

[15]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  What makes Web sites credible?: a report on a large quantitative study , 2001, CHI.

[16]  Jacques Boisvert.  Pensée critique et sciences humaines : étude sur l'évolution de la pensée critique des élèves du programme de sciences humaines au collégial / , 2002 .

[17]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Kate M. Manuel.  What Do First-Year Students Know about Information Research? And What Can We Teach Them? , 2005 .

[19]  Developing a Framework for Assessing Information Quality on the World Wide Web , 2005 .

[20]  A. Serres,et al.  Evaluation de l'information sur Internet: le defi de la formation , 2005 .

[21]  Wallapak Tavanapong,et al.  Developing a Framework for Assessing Information Quality on the World Wide Web , 2005, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[22]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning , 2006 .

[23]  Yves Duchesne.  Chercher pour trouver , 2006 .

[24]  Nicole Boubée.  Des pratiques documentaires ordinaires : analyse de l’activité de recherche d’information des élèves du secondaire , 2007 .

[25]  J. Rouet,et al.  Comment mieux évaluer les informations issues de sources multiples , 2007 .

[26]  Reijo Savolainen,et al.  Media credibility and cognitive authority. The case of seeking orienting information , 2007, Inf. Res..

[27]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Digital Media and Youth: Unparalleled Opportunity and Unprecedented Responsibility , 2008 .

[28]  Ivan Jablonka.  Le livre : son passé, son avenir , 2008 .

[29]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[30]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  College Students' Credibility Judgments in the Information-Seeking Process , 2008 .

[31]  N. Carr.  Is Google Making Us Stupid? , 2008, The Best Technology Writing 2009.

[32]  Amber Walraven,et al.  Becoming a critical websearcher: Effects of instruction to foster transfer , 2008 .

[33]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Students Evaluating Internet Sources: From Versatile Evaluators to Uncritical Readers , 2008 .

[34]  B. R. Babu.  Information Literacy—Competency Standards and Performance Indicators: An Overview , 2008 .

[35]  Derek L. Hansen,et al.  Virtual provider pessimism: analysing instant messaging reference encounters with the pair perception comparison method , 2009, Inf. Res..

[36]  G. Small,et al.  Your brain on Google: patterns of cerebral activation during internet searching. , 2009, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[37]  Helena Francke,et al.  In search of credibility: pupils' information practices in learning environments , 2009, Inf. Res..

[38]  Juan M. Fernández-Luna,et al.  Teaching and learning in information retrieval , 2009, Information Retrieval.